If you want to compare to the private sector major corporations rarely pay off all their debt, they roll it over. Very few, if any , major corporations are debt free.
Advertisement
by Purple Robed Empire » Sun May 29, 2016 7:47 pm
by Purple Robed Empire » Sun May 29, 2016 7:53 pm
by Vashty » Sun May 29, 2016 8:04 pm
by Galloism » Sun May 29, 2016 8:08 pm
by Vashty » Sun May 29, 2016 8:15 pm
Galloism wrote:Purple Robed Empire wrote:
No, it is called insurance because you pay for it. When you work you pay an unemployment insurance tax and when you are unemployed you take some of that money back out.
/nitpick
Employers pay unemployment insurance, not employees.
You could argue that's reflected in the wage ultimately offered to the employee, and you probably would not be wrong, but technically...
by Farnhamia » Sun May 29, 2016 8:15 pm
by Annorax » Sun May 29, 2016 9:08 pm
by Galloism » Sun May 29, 2016 9:09 pm
by Farnhamia » Sun May 29, 2016 9:34 pm
by San Lumen » Sun May 29, 2016 9:36 pm
by Britanania » Sun May 29, 2016 9:36 pm
San Lumen wrote:Annorax wrote:
I don't care it's built on lies and fake fiat currency. We would get out of it eventually and in the end be stronger for it.
Yes exactly. And every investment should have risk including US treasury bonds. Us Treasury debt shouldn't be a risk free asset it should have risk like any other investment. Its stupid to have built a whole financial infrastructure on the notion that country will never default. So the government doesn't stand behind its word and confidence in our financial system is severely eroded. Why would that be bad? The system gets a massive shock and we go back to individual economies. Polls have also shown a majority of those under 35 don't support capitalism.
by Farnhamia » Sun May 29, 2016 9:38 pm
San Lumen wrote:Annorax wrote:
I don't care it's built on lies and fake fiat currency. We would get out of it eventually and in the end be stronger for it.
Yes exactly. And every investment should have risk including US treasury bonds. Us Treasury debt shouldn't be a risk free asset it should have risk like any other investment. Its stupid to have built a whole financial infrastructure on the notion that country will never default. So the government doesn't stand behind its word and confidence in our financial system is severely eroded. Why would that be bad? The system gets a massive shock and we go back to individual economies. Polls have also shown a majority of those under 35 don't support capitalism.
by Annorax » Sun May 29, 2016 9:43 pm
Farnhamia wrote:San Lumen wrote:Yes exactly. And every investment should have risk including US treasury bonds. Us Treasury debt shouldn't be a risk free asset it should have risk like any other investment. Its stupid to have built a whole financial infrastructure on the notion that country will never default. So the government doesn't stand behind its word and confidence in our financial system is severely eroded. Why would that be bad? The system gets a massive shock and we go back to individual economies. Polls have also shown a majority of those under 35 don't support capitalism.
Sorry? Why would it be bad for the United States of America to go back on its pledged word to pay its debts? Are you kidding me? That you would make such a statement tells me you have no concept of honor or obligation.
by Farnhamia » Sun May 29, 2016 9:44 pm
Annorax wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Sorry? Why would it be bad for the United States of America to go back on its pledged word to pay its debts? Are you kidding me? That you would make such a statement tells me you have no concept of honor or obligation.
Some of those debts were incurred fighting wars for other countries would you suggest the U.S. take that money back by force if necessary then? What about that honor and obligation?
by Annorax » Sun May 29, 2016 9:44 pm
by San Lumen » Sun May 29, 2016 9:45 pm
Farnhamia wrote:San Lumen wrote:Yes exactly. And every investment should have risk including US treasury bonds. Us Treasury debt shouldn't be a risk free asset it should have risk like any other investment. Its stupid to have built a whole financial infrastructure on the notion that country will never default. So the government doesn't stand behind its word and confidence in our financial system is severely eroded. Why would that be bad? The system gets a massive shock and we go back to individual economies. Polls have also shown a majority of those under 35 don't support capitalism.
Sorry? Why would it be bad for the United States of America to go back on its pledged word to pay its debts? Are you kidding me? That you would make such a statement tells me you have no concept of honor or obligation.
by The East Marches » Sun May 29, 2016 9:47 pm
San Lumen wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Sorry? Why would it be bad for the United States of America to go back on its pledged word to pay its debts? Are you kidding me? That you would make such a statement tells me you have no concept of honor or obligation.
Maybe because if we keep borrowing we will wind up like Greece very soon. Stop borrowing and only spend what we take in. Many people I know agree with me.
by Farnhamia » Sun May 29, 2016 9:48 pm
San Lumen wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Sorry? Why would it be bad for the United States of America to go back on its pledged word to pay its debts? Are you kidding me? That you would make such a statement tells me you have no concept of honor or obligation.
Maybe because if we keep borrowing we will wind up like Greece very soon. Stop borrowing and only spend what we take in. Many people I know agree with me.
by Britanania » Sun May 29, 2016 9:49 pm
Farnhamia wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Maybe because if we keep borrowing we will wind up like Greece very soon. Stop borrowing and only spend what we take in. Many people I know agree with me.
The US does not borrow money the way you or I do. The US sells bonds which bear interest. The United States is one of, if not the safest investments in the world.
by Farnhamia » Sun May 29, 2016 9:49 pm
by Annorax » Sun May 29, 2016 9:51 pm
by Imperial Idaho » Sun May 29, 2016 9:54 pm
Annorax wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Sure, what's a generation or two of 19th century standard of loving in the 21st? Walk it off.
Its built on lies, some guys in a room decide what is money and what isn't and only they are allowed to lord over it. If I did that I would get thrown in jail for counterfeiting, they do it and become rich.
You walk it off.
I'm from the land of Coeur D'alene Idaho.
By Ballot or by Bullet, the Pub Party will win. The Pub Legacy Edition.Ifreann wrote:The Romans placated the people with panem et circenses, bread and circuses. We will placate our people with dank space weed and hyper-HD vidya.Tysoania wrote:You remind me of a mobster who gets things cleared out of the way.
Next up on the Sopranos...
Imperial "Slick" Idaho, the fixer.Bralia wrote:Oh my fucking god. Do it again, guys, you both chose the number 7.
by San Lumen » Sun May 29, 2016 9:55 pm
Annorax wrote:Farnhamia wrote:What war debts are still outstanding?
All of them since the Civil War, at least as of 2013. I admit most of that is still outstanding is the Iraq and Afghan war, but the U.S. could have taken the oil to pay for it which is what most people said the U.S. would do but didn't. Afghanistan has nothing, I guess they could pay in poppy and lithium I dunno.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-cost ... ars-2013-3
by Egemore » Sun May 29, 2016 9:56 pm
Annorax wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Sure, what's a generation or two of 19th century standard of loving in the 21st? Walk it off.
Its built on lies, some guys in a room decide what is money and what isn't and only they are allowed to lord over it. If I did that I would get thrown in jail for counterfeiting, they do it and become rich.
You walk it off.
by Farnhamia » Sun May 29, 2016 9:56 pm
Annorax wrote:Farnhamia wrote:What war debts are still outstanding?
All of them since the Civil War, at least as of 2013. I admit most of that is still outstanding is the Iraq and Afghan war, but the U.S. could have taken the oil to pay for it which is what most people said the U.S. would do but didn't. Afghanistan has nothing, I guess they could pay in poppy and lithium I dunno.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-cost ... ars-2013-3
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Eurocom, Herador, Juristonia, Likhinia, Mergold-Aurlia, Neu California, Shidei, The Black Forrest, Tillania, Tsarus 2142
Advertisement