Advertisement
by Wolfmanne2 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:39 am
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:43 am
Wolfmanne2 wrote:https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/76611/exclusive-150-labour-mps-face-defeat-snap-general
Nihil and Lamadia, go pop the champagne. Corbots, don't wake up or you'll smell the coffee.
by Souseiseki » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:45 am
by Souseiseki » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:46 am
by Wolfmanne2 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:49 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Wolfmanne2 wrote:https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/76611/exclusive-150-labour-mps-face-defeat-snap-general
Nihil and Lamadia, go pop the champagne. Corbots, don't wake up or you'll smell the coffee.
Holy crap! That is insane. I raised the prospect a couple of days ago it could be like Scotland all over again but I never thought something like this was a possibility.
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by The Nihilistic view » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:49 am
by Souseiseki » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:51 am
Wolfmanne2 wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
Holy crap! That is insane. I raised the prospect a couple of days ago it could be like Scotland all over again but I never thought something like this was a possibility.
This coup is really all or nothing. I don't think I've ever seen grassroots moderates so organised right now, we're literally fighting for our existence.
by Wolfmanne2 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:52 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Already got our first slogan for the people that are remainers. Vote labour get UKIP.
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Wolfmanne2 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:54 am
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Questers » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:04 am
by Souseiseki » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:04 am
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:11 am
Questers wrote:I am not inherently or intrinsically against replacing Corbyn. His performance in PMQs was lacklustre, he doesn't have the panache of a modern politician and he does have some personally very sketchy views.
However if he's going to be replaced with someone in the new labourite tradition it will really be the end of the Party.
There's absolutely no reason for anyone in the ex-labour heartlands where leave dominated -- and where big name labourites would lose their vote in a snap election, apparently -- to come back to voting for any of those types of people.
Last year during the leadership election we can probably remember how the two centre-right options for Labour (Cooper & Kendall) and Andy Burnham all abstained on the Welfare Bill. Corbyn voted no. Imo this says everything about these people. We could replace Corbyn, tbh, but the leftwards movement of the Party is irreplaceable.
by Questers » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:11 am
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:13 am
Questers wrote:There are millions -- quite literally -- of working class people who voted Leave because of dissatisfaction with politics and the slow erosion of their communities.
Why anyone thinks they would vote for Yvette Cooper is beyond me. If they get rid of Corbyn Labour has to put someone in who is ACTUALLY electable not electable in 2005.
by Valaran » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:13 am
Questers wrote:Why anyone thinks they would vote for Yvette Cooper is beyond me. If they get rid of Corbyn Labour has to put someone in who is ACTUALLY electable not electable in 2005.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire
by Souseiseki » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:13 am
by Wolfmanne2 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:14 am
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:14 am
by Questers » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:15 am
The best part: no. I can't think of any. It has to be non-Corbyn cabinet but not far right enough that they would actually propose changing something about the fucking country. Maybe Benn? I don't know. There is also Burnham but he was in the Corbyn cabinet sooo
by Valaran » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:17 am
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Owen Smith would satisfy Questers.
Questers wrote: The best part: no. I can't think of any. It has to be non-Corbyn cabinet but not far right enough that they would actually propose changing something about the fucking country. Maybe Benn? I don't know. There is also Burnham but he was in the Corbyn cabinet sooo
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire
by Ostroeuropa » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:18 am
Questers wrote:The best part: no. I can't think of any. It has to be non-Corbyn cabinet but not far right enough that they would actually propose changing something about the fucking country. Maybe Benn? I don't know. There is also Burnham but he was in the Corbyn cabinet sooo
by Souseiseki » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:19 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Cyptopir, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Keltionialang, Kidai, Stellar Colonies, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan, Western Theram, Zetaopalatopia, Zurkerx
Advertisement