Sign in with an e-mail address, or make an account, which guarantees your age at the risk of being faced with legal action.
Advertisement
by Lamadia II » Sun May 29, 2016 2:05 pm
by Vassenor » Sun May 29, 2016 2:07 pm
by Imperializt Russia » Sun May 29, 2016 2:11 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Souseiseki » Sun May 29, 2016 2:14 pm
By making the creation of websites without appropriate means to stop minors from accessing them illegal. Quite simple, isn't it? Police look for websites or have them reported with no such restrictions. The same methods for tracking down the 'even worse' parts of the genre you note below- it is worth it, considering the psychological effects this kind of thing can have on minors. It would not be difficult to get this through Parliament.
Anything involving minors or non-consensual intercourse is illegal
but I am bearing in mind I am at school, it is a risky area, and therefore I do not want to go into detail on that subject.
Cocaine, heroin and other class-A substances punishable with heavier penalties for drugs such as marijuana, which would be punishable upon supply with intent to use, however not in possession with intent to sell. Again, harder to get through Parliament, however merely an extension on current laws, reducing the impact drugs have on society in the case of less-severe substances by accepting they are used, offering the freedom to do so, whilst fighting to destroy the illegal industry.
Sign in with an e-mail address, or make an account, which guarantees your age at the risk of being faced with legal action.
by Valaran » Sun May 29, 2016 2:15 pm
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire
by Wolfmanne2 » Sun May 29, 2016 2:15 pm
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Salandriagado » Sun May 29, 2016 2:15 pm
by Wolfmanne2 » Sun May 29, 2016 2:17 pm
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Souseiseki » Sun May 29, 2016 2:17 pm
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Thank god that civil servants and political advisers exist to tell Lamadia 'this is fucking impossible'.
by Conscentia » Sun May 29, 2016 2:17 pm
Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
by Wolfmanne2 » Sun May 29, 2016 2:18 pm
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun May 29, 2016 2:21 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Lamadia II » Sun May 29, 2016 2:24 pm
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Thank god that civil servants and political advisers exist to tell Lamadia 'this is fucking impossible'.
Valaran wrote:Lamadia II wrote:Sign in with an e-mail address, or make an account, which guarantees your age at the risk of being faced with legal action.
There are several issues with such a proposal that have been noted, not to mention that this does nothing to resolve the distribution of pornography via other means (sending images via communication sites, for instance).
In short, there is no foolproof method for to ensure that minors cannot see illegal material.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun May 29, 2016 2:26 pm
Lamadia II wrote:Wolfmanne2 wrote:Thank god that civil servants and political advisers exist to tell Lamadia 'this is fucking impossible'.
I have the funny feeling that if I were Home Secretary, and they said that to me, I would first of all tell them to bugger-off and then use my predecessor’s I.P.B to blackmail them into doing as I say!
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Salandriagado » Sun May 29, 2016 2:27 pm
Lamadia II wrote:Wolfmanne2 wrote:Thank god that civil servants and political advisers exist to tell Lamadia 'this is fucking impossible'.
I have the funny feeling that if I were Home Secretary, and they said that to me, I would first of all tell them to bugger-off and then use my predecessor’s I.P.B to blackmail them into doing as I say!
Valaran wrote:
There are several issues with such a proposal that have been noted, not to mention that this does nothing to resolve the distribution of pornography via other means (sending images via communication sites, for instance).
In short, there is no foolproof method for to ensure that minors cannot see illegal material.
No, and, obviously, this is all rhetoric speculation. But there has to be a way of stopping minors accessing such material, or at least make it much harder.
by Souseiseki » Sun May 29, 2016 2:28 pm
Lamadia II wrote:Wolfmanne2 wrote:Thank god that civil servants and political advisers exist to tell Lamadia 'this is fucking impossible'.
I have the funny feeling that if I were Home Secretary, and they said that to me, I would first of all tell them to bugger-off and then use my predecessor’s I.P.B to blackmail them into doing as I say!Valaran wrote:
There are several issues with such a proposal that have been noted, not to mention that this does nothing to resolve the distribution of pornography via other means (sending images via communication sites, for instance).
In short, there is no foolproof method for to ensure that minors cannot see illegal material.
No, and, obviously, this is all rhetoric speculation. But there has to be a way of stopping minors accessing such material, or at least make it much harder.
by Valaran » Sun May 29, 2016 2:28 pm
Lamadia II wrote:[Valaran wrote:
There are several issues with such a proposal that have been noted, not to mention that this does nothing to resolve the distribution of pornography via other means (sending images via communication sites, for instance).
In short, there is no foolproof method for to ensure that minors cannot see illegal material.
No, and, obviously, this is all rhetoric speculation. But there has to be a way of stopping minors accessing such material, or at least make it much harder.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire
by Wolfmanne2 » Sun May 29, 2016 2:29 pm
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Lamadia II » Sun May 29, 2016 2:33 pm
by Olivaero » Sun May 29, 2016 3:10 pm
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Please be joking.
You know how I appear complete and utterly amoral and nasty and shit, along with being complete and utterly nitpicky of my own party due to an obsession of being able to win elections? Spin doctors are like that. Except a billion times worse. The Thick of It is might as well be a docudrama.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZLkvzJGfJA
It's laughable to suggest you could take on people like Lynton Crosby, Peter Mandelson and Alistair Campbell. They're hired because they can scare the shit out of politicians.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun May 29, 2016 3:15 pm
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Please be joking.
You know how I appear complete and utterly amoral and nasty and shit, along with being complete and utterly nitpicky of my own party due to an obsession of being able to win elections? Spin doctors are like that. Except a billion times worse. The Thick of It is might as well be a docudrama.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZLkvzJGfJA
It's laughable to suggest you could take on people like Lynton Crosby, Peter Mandelson and Alistair Campbell. They're hired because they can scare the shit out of politicians.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Anywhere Else But Here » Sun May 29, 2016 3:22 pm
by Napkiraly » Sun May 29, 2016 3:29 pm
*raises hand*
by Philjia » Sun May 29, 2016 4:34 pm
by Anywhere Else But Here » Sun May 29, 2016 5:09 pm
Philjia wrote:I think this is important, or at least interesting. It's a recording of Clement Attlee explaining the welfare state and the NHS to the public. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rqyzWzDONQ
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Philjia, Spirit of Hope, Vassenor
Advertisement