by Perthenexia » Sat Jan 09, 2016 2:48 pm
by Liberty and Linguistics » Sat Jan 09, 2016 2:54 pm
by Wardie land » Sat Jan 09, 2016 2:58 pm
by Vassenor » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:03 pm
Wardie land wrote:California was its own nation in 1846, I don't see why it can't be again
by Dooom35796821595 » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:16 pm
by The balkens » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:18 pm
by Conservative Republic Of Huang » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:20 pm
by Rhyfelnydd » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:20 pm
Wardie land wrote:California was its own nation in 1846, I don't see why it can't be again
New Grestin wrote:Welcome to Nationstates Summer.
You can log out anytime you like, but you can never leave.
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Canton Empire » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:22 pm
by Dooom35796821595 » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:22 pm
by Kazarstan » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:22 pm
by Ifreann » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:25 pm
Wardie land wrote:California was its own nation in 1846, I don't see why it can't be again
by Ifreann » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:28 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:
I don't know if it's popular or not, but having the highest court rule against it won't stop an independence movement. I'm basing my reasoning on the Canadian and Scottish independence referendums, and how it would be near impossible for America to justify denying their own states independence based solely on the desision of five justices on a seperate case in the nation they want independence from.
by Dooom35796821595 » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:30 pm
Ifreann wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
I don't know if it's popular or not, but having the highest court rule against it won't stop an independence movement. I'm basing my reasoning on the Canadian and Scottish independence referendums, and how it would be near impossible for America to justify denying their own states independence based solely on the desision of five justices on a seperate case in the nation they want independence from.
Texas v. White does not make it impossible for states to leave the union. It holds that it is unconstitutional for them to do so unilaterally. California cannot, for the purposes of the United States, simply declare itself independent.
by Quokkastan » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:30 pm
Wardie land wrote:California was its own nation in 1846, I don't see why it can't be again
by Ifreann » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:41 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Ifreann wrote:Texas v. White does not make it impossible for states to leave the union. It holds that it is unconstitutional for them to do so unilaterally. California cannot, for the purposes of the United States, simply declare itself independent.
So something like a referendum could be used to begin the process. Yes?
by Noraika » Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:58 pm
LOVEWHOYOUARE~TRANS⚧EQUALITY~~ Economic Left -9.38 | Social Libertarian -2.77 ~
~ 93 Equality - 36 Liberty - 50 Stability ~Democratic Socialism ● Egalitarianism ● Feminism ● LGBT+ rights ● Monarchism ● Social Justice ● Souverainism ● StatismPronouns: She/Her ♀️⛦ Pagan and proud! ⛦⚧Gender and sex aren't the same thing!⚧
by Geilinor » Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:03 pm
by Staythefout » Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:03 pm
by North America Inc » Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:05 pm
by Paredonia » Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:05 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Ethel mermania, Eurocom, General TN, Google [Bot], Keltionialang, Kreushia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Norse Inuit Union, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Technostan, Uiiop, Umeria
Advertisement