Logical argument against Islamophobia?
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 10:29 am
Vbbbbh
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Unfortunately for you, you're just going to get called a "big bad racist bully" and a "dirty xenophobe" around these forums.
Expect fallacies in this thread such as "hurr durr brown people." Buckle in dude, you just criticized Islam on NSG, and that never ends well.
I want less immigrants/refugees from cultures that don't mimic a nations dominant one.
Estimates range that between five to 12 million Muslims live in the United States. About one-third of them are African-Americans. Another third are originally from the Indian subcontinent, including Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline ... /faqs.html
Italios wrote:I want less immigrants/refugees from cultures that don't mimic a nations dominant one.
Uhhhh.... If you're talking about the US, there really isn't a totally dominant culture, since its population is comprised of a bunch of totally different ethnicities all put under the same label of "American".
I mean, there are already so many Muslims living in America.Estimates range that between five to 12 million Muslims live in the United States. About one-third of them are African-Americans. Another third are originally from the Indian subcontinent, including Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline ... /faqs.html
Gauthier wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Unfortunately for you, you're just going to get called a "big bad racist bully" and a "dirty xenophobe" around these forums.
Expect fallacies in this thread such as "hurr durr brown people." Buckle in dude, you just criticized Islam on NSG, and that never ends well.
Just like how The Bell Curve was a logical argument for the intellectual inferiority of blacks. *nod*
VoetbalPompey wrote:I've been doing a lot of research for the past year or so and it seems that I have reached a conclusion where I want less immigrants/refugees from cultures that don't mimic a nations dominant one.
Here are some points I currently have:
1) Multiculturalism while in theory sounds great, is something only white/western societies seem to see as ideal. Is this not white suicide? I'd say suicide since they're literally doing it to themselves.
2) Due to low birthrates in these cultures an influx of "outsiders" who breed at a higher rate means that demographically they (the outsiders) will become the majority in that country as growth will increase exponentially.
3) Once a majority has been reached then democratically that country should follow the wishes of the majority of their population. Which would be the laws and traditions of the original "outsiders"
4) Bringing the failing ideologies, traditions, beliefs and way of life from failing country B to country A will turn country A into B overtime.
I have many more points, and statistics but there is already a lot here. Basically what I'm asking for is an intelligent, logical rebuttal. I unlike many others am a rational person and am willing to change my current view when presented with evidence.
Thoughts?
VoetbalPompey wrote:
1) Multiculturalism while in theory sounds great, is something only white/western societies seem to see as ideal. Is this not white suicide? I'd say suicide since they're literally doing it to themselves.
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Gauthier wrote:
Just like how The Bell Curve was a logical argument for the intellectual inferiority of blacks. *nod*
Thanks for proving my point.
That has nothing to do with the thread, but you're already bringing some other bullshit into this, that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
And, of course it wasn't a fucking logical argument. But, that's not relevant.
VoetbalPompey wrote:I've been doing a lot of research for the past year or so and it seems that I have reached a conclusion where I want less immigrants/refugees from cultures that don't mimic a nations dominant one.
Here are some points I currently have:
1) Multiculturalism while in theory sounds great, is something only white/western societies seem to see as ideal. Is this not white suicide? I'd say suicide since they're literally doing it to themselves.
2) Due to low birthrates in these cultures an influx of "outsiders" who breed at a higher rate means that demographically they (the outsiders) will become the majority in that country as growth will increase exponentially.
3) Once a majority has been reached then democratically that country should follow the wishes of the majority of their population. Which would be the laws and traditions of the original "outsiders"
4) Bringing the failing ideologies, traditions, beliefs and way of life from failing country B to country A will turn country A into B overtime.
I have many more points, and statistics but there is already a lot here. Basically what I'm asking for is an intelligent, logical rebuttal. I unlike many others am a rational person and am willing to change my current view when presented with evidence.
Thoughts?
VoetbalPompey wrote:I've been doing a lot of research for the past year or so and it seems that I have reached a conclusion where I want less immigrants/refugees from cultures that don't mimic a nations dominant one.
Here are some points I currently have:
1) Multiculturalism while in theory sounds great, is something only white/western societies seem to see as ideal. Is this not white suicide? I'd say suicide since they're literally doing it to themselves.
2) Due to low birthrates in these cultures an influx of "outsiders" who breed at a higher rate means that demographically they (the outsiders) will become the majority in that country as growth will increase exponentially.
3) Once a majority has been reached then democratically that country should follow the wishes of the majority of their population. Which would be the laws and traditions of the original "outsiders"
4) Bringing the failing ideologies, traditions, beliefs and way of life from failing country B to country A will turn country A into B overtime.
I have many more points, and statistics but there is already a lot here. Basically what I'm asking for is an intelligent, logical rebuttal. I unlike many others am a rational person and am willing to change my current view when presented with evidence.
Thoughts?
Gauthier wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Thanks for proving my point.
That has nothing to do with the thread, but you're already bringing some other bullshit into this, that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
And, of course it wasn't a fucking logical argument. But, that's not relevant.
It's amusing how you're taking a point that uses the term "white suicide" as a logical argument in the meantime.
VoetbalPompey wrote:2) Due to low birthrates in these cultures an influx of "outsiders" who breed at a higher rate means that demographically they (the outsiders) will become the majority in that country as growth will increase exponentially.
In Europe as a whole, the Muslim share of the population is expected to grow by nearly one-third over the next 20 years, rising from 6% of the region’s inhabitants in 2010 to 8% in 2030.
Gauthier wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Thanks for proving my point.
That has nothing to do with the thread, but you're already bringing some other bullshit into this, that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
And, of course it wasn't a fucking logical argument. But, that's not relevant.
It's amusing how you're taking a point that uses the term "white suicide" as a logical argument in the meantime.
Gauthier wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Unfortunately for you, you're just going to get called a "big bad racist bully" and a "dirty xenophobe" around these forums.
Expect fallacies in this thread such as "hurr durr brown people." Buckle in dude, you just criticized Islam on NSG, and that never ends well.
Just like how The Bell Curve was a logical argument for the intellectual inferiority of blacks. *nod*
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Gauthier wrote:
It's amusing how you're taking a point that uses the term "white suicide" as a logical argument in the meantime.
It's not logical, I'll admit. I just know that his arguments will be excused and shoved aside, as opposed to debated seriously, because this is about Islam, which has some protected status here.
So, no, the OP clearly is wrong in some regards, including ones where he acts as if it's some sort of Eurabian plot where Muslims will outnumber us all. That said, I agree with parts of it, including the fact that multiculturalism simply hasn't been working, and that Islam, particularly in Europe, causes much more harm than good.
Italios wrote:I mean, there are already so many Muslims living in America.
The Qeiiam Star Cluster wrote:VoetbalPompey wrote:2) Due to low birthrates in these cultures an influx of "outsiders" who breed at a higher rate means that demographically they (the outsiders) will become the majority in that country as growth will increase exponentially.
http://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/the- ... opulation/In Europe as a whole, the Muslim share of the population is expected to grow by nearly one-third over the next 20 years, rising from 6% of the region’s inhabitants in 2010 to 8% in 2030.
Oh noez, 8%! That's almost a majority! Also note that most of this increase will be because of immigration, not because of higher birthrates.