Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:15 am
If Stalin rose from the grave I'd vote for him. Mainly because I don't want to be sent to the zombie gulag
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Thermodolia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
What do you expect from people who want to win votes and have, for years, pandered to the far-right, bigoted, nigh anarcho-capitalist members of society?
The Repubs are no where near anarcho-capitalism, they are more of an rich oligarch that runs the government.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:The party needs a thorough detox to get all the tea out of its system.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Thermodolia wrote:The Repubs are no where near anarcho-capitalism, they are more of an rich oligarch that runs the government.
Exactly what the logical conclusion to anarcho-capitalism is, if you think about it
Note: I am not talking about libertarianism, although I realize anarcho-capitalists are a more capitalist, more libertarian bend of libertarians.
Ethel mermania wrote:Galloism wrote:I kind of sincerely hope they do go towards "true conservatism". It will make the party implode.
Me too, the religious right has no place in true conservatism. Goldwater was for gay rights, just saying.
It was also force the democrats to go true progressive, and then a more realistic party structure on both sides would emerge.
Galloism wrote:Planita wrote:Can you please explain me why the Europeans say our politics are skewed to the right? What policies make the Dems centre-right?
Well, the lack of universal health care in favor of some weird subsidy system is a good start.
We can also go with the democrats lackluster support of unions.
I can keep going if you want.
Galloism wrote:Planita wrote:Please. I need ammo for my neighbour
They're not (generally) significantly in favor of paid family leave, although Sanders and Hillary both are (which they should be). This is actually a fairly new development and I hope it sticks.
They're not in favor of the workers seizing the means of production from the capital investors.
They're not in favor of nationalizing the banks or factories.
Lots of things.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Me too, the religious right has no place in true conservatism. Goldwater was for gay rights, just saying.
It was also force the democrats to go true progressive, and then a more realistic party structure on both sides would emerge.
Wait, so the religious right is not a product of conservatism? Then what is it a product of?
Ethel mermania wrote:Galloism wrote:I kind of sincerely hope they do go towards "true conservatism". It will make the party implode.
Me too, the religious right has no place in true conservatism. Goldwater was for gay rights, just saying.
It was also force the democrats to go true progressive, and then a more realistic party structure on both sides would emerge.