NATION

PASSWORD

The NationStates Feminist Thread II

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Unpredictable Galaxy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 379
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Unpredictable Galaxy » Wed Oct 19, 2016 3:56 pm

I would like to state first off that I am a man and a feminist.

Can a person be labeled as a feminist and still want to deny women from having abortions? It feels very contradictory and backwards logic to want women to have greater rights while simultaneously wanting to restrict them. How exactly would you define feminism in these cases?

Edit: Sorry if it's veering off an entire discussion going on.
Last edited by Unpredictable Galaxy on Wed Oct 19, 2016 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to know just what is going on with our nation? Check out our delightful FactBook!

Proud Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton supporter.

REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT!

User avatar
Arcturus Novus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6727
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arcturus Novus » Wed Oct 19, 2016 3:58 pm

Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:I would like to state first off that I am a man and a feminist.

Can a person be labeled as a feminist and still want to deny women from having abortions? It feels very contradictory and backwards logic to want women to have greater rights while simultaneously wanting to restrict them. How exactly would you define feminism in these cases?

Ultimately, feminism means standing up for all women's rights, even the right to choose.
Arcy (she/her), NS' fourth-favorite transsexual communist!
"I can fix her!" cool, I'm gonna make her worse.
me - my politics - my twitter
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.

User avatar
Unpredictable Galaxy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 379
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Unpredictable Galaxy » Wed Oct 19, 2016 3:59 pm

Arcturus Novus wrote:
Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:I would like to state first off that I am a man and a feminist.

Can a person be labeled as a feminist and still want to deny women from having abortions? It feels very contradictory and backwards logic to want women to have greater rights while simultaneously wanting to restrict them. How exactly would you define feminism in these cases?

Ultimately, feminism means standing up for all women's rights, even the right to choose.


But if someone wants to ban abortions nationwide to where there is no option of choice, what do you say there?
Want to know just what is going on with our nation? Check out our delightful FactBook!

Proud Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton supporter.

REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT!

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:03 pm

Arcturus Novus wrote:Ultimately, feminism means standing up for all women's rights, even the right to choose.


How about the right to murder?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Arcturus Novus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6727
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arcturus Novus » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:04 pm

Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:
Arcturus Novus wrote:Ultimately, feminism means standing up for all women's rights, even the right to choose.


But if someone wants to ban abortions nationwide to where there is no option of choice, what do you say there?

Then that's antifeminist. A woman- really, a person capable of pregnancy- deserves the right to bodily autonomy. If we suppress that right, then we are not acting in the interests of equality among genders.
Arcy (she/her), NS' fourth-favorite transsexual communist!
"I can fix her!" cool, I'm gonna make her worse.
me - my politics - my twitter
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.

User avatar
Unpredictable Galaxy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 379
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Unpredictable Galaxy » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Arcturus Novus wrote:Ultimately, feminism means standing up for all women's rights, even the right to choose.


How about the right to murder?


You need a hunting license for that, mate.

And this isn't a discussion of right/wrong for abortion, this is about contradictory views within the definition of feminism.
Want to know just what is going on with our nation? Check out our delightful FactBook!

Proud Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton supporter.

REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT!

User avatar
Unpredictable Galaxy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 379
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Unpredictable Galaxy » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:05 pm

Arcturus Novus wrote:
Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:
But if someone wants to ban abortions nationwide to where there is no option of choice, what do you say there?

Then that's antifeminist. A woman- really, a person capable of pregnancy- deserves the right to bodily autonomy. If we suppress that right, then we are not acting in the interests of equality among genders.


I should say that I totally agree with you; there's just a woman I know who says she's a feminist standing for women's rights, but is heavily pro-life. She's a little... not the most proper.
Want to know just what is going on with our nation? Check out our delightful FactBook!

Proud Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton supporter.

REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT!

User avatar
Sacred Toast
Diplomat
 
Posts: 967
Founded: Feb 13, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Sacred Toast » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:07 pm

Arcturus Novus wrote:
Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:
But if someone wants to ban abortions nationwide to where there is no option of choice, what do you say there?

Then that's antifeminist. A woman- really, a person capable of pregnancy- deserves the right to bodily autonomy. If we suppress that right, then we are not acting in the interests of equality among genders.

1st I would like to saying banning abortions is like banning men from using condoms


2nd I would argue that even if I don't agree with it, it isn't antifeminist because it isn't lowering a woman's rights below men. It is, however a sketchy subject due to the lack of comparison to the male gender


Edit: original said "because it is lowering a women's right"
Last edited by Sacred Toast on Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Agnostic Theist who loves to discuss religious and political history (or future if you are so inclined)

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:12 pm

Radikala Skold wrote:Today I have been accused of having internalized misogyny :unsure: it has been a bad experience.


Well, you do seem to have misogynistic ideas about what is appropriate behavior for women and what isn't so I'd say whoever said that about you, they're not wrong.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
The Grene Knyght
Minister
 
Posts: 3274
Founded: May 07, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Grene Knyght » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:14 pm

Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:I would like to state first off that I am a man and a feminist.

Can a person be labeled as a feminist and still want to deny women from having abortions? It feels very contradictory and backwards logic to want women to have greater rights while simultaneously wanting to restrict them. How exactly would you define feminism in these cases?

Edit: Sorry if it's veering off an entire discussion going on.

It really depends on what definition of feminism you use. The OP of this thread links to 30-something different flavours, so I'd imagina there's some that argue you can be a pro-life feminist.
So I would say yes, you can be labelled a feminist, but not by me.
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Socialist Women wrote:Part of the reason you're an anarchist is because you ate too much expired food
Claorica wrote:Oh look, an antifa ancom being smartaleck
Old Tyrannia wrote:Bold words from the self-declared Leninist
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
     
PRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian Moralist

User avatar
Unpredictable Galaxy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 379
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Unpredictable Galaxy » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:17 pm

The Grene Knyght wrote:
Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:I would like to state first off that I am a man and a feminist.

Can a person be labeled as a feminist and still want to deny women from having abortions? It feels very contradictory and backwards logic to want women to have greater rights while simultaneously wanting to restrict them. How exactly would you define feminism in these cases?

Edit: Sorry if it's veering off an entire discussion going on.

It really depends on what definition of feminism you use. The OP of this thread links to 30-something different flavours, so I'd imagina there's some that argue you can be a pro-life feminist.
So I would say yes, you can be labelled a feminist, but not by me.


Yeah, I don't see it as feminism either. It's just so... backwards. How can you want more and less rights for women? I feel as if those people really haven't delved deep into their ideology and discovered what it truly should work for.
Want to know just what is going on with our nation? Check out our delightful FactBook!

Proud Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton supporter.

REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT!

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:17 pm

Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:
You need a hunting license for that, mate.

And this isn't a discussion of right/wrong for abortion, this is about contradictory views within the definition of feminism.


I'm not debating abortion I'm debating murder. The claim was feminism meant standing up for "all women's rights." That leads to the question "what are women's rights?" If someone says that women don't have the right to go around shooting people in the street that's not anti-woman it's simply saying that murder is one of the rights women don't have. A lot of anti-abortion rhetoric comes from a place of controlling women but I don't think all of it does and I don't think that being against abortion means you should be kicked out of the club.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The Grene Knyght
Minister
 
Posts: 3274
Founded: May 07, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Grene Knyght » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:20 pm

Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:It really depends on what definition of feminism you use. The OP of this thread links to 30-something different flavours, so I'd imagina there's some that argue you can be a pro-life feminist.
So I would say yes, you can be labelled a feminist, but not by me.


Yeah, I don't see it as feminism either. It's just so... backwards. How can you want more and less rights for women? I feel as if those people really haven't delved deep into their ideology and discovered what it truly should work for.

I suppose one explanation for such a mindset is someone who prioritises another, conflicting belief over feminism.
Someone might be a catholic feminist, but identify as a catholic first, and only adhere to feminism when it doesn't conflict with Catholicism.
Thats only a guess at what might make someone think like that, though.
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Socialist Women wrote:Part of the reason you're an anarchist is because you ate too much expired food
Claorica wrote:Oh look, an antifa ancom being smartaleck
Old Tyrannia wrote:Bold words from the self-declared Leninist
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
     
PRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian Moralist

User avatar
RFI
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Aug 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby RFI » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:21 pm

Costa Fierro wrote:
Radikala Skold wrote:Today I have been accused of having internalized misogyny :unsure: it has been a bad experience.


Well, you do seem to have misogynistic ideas about what is appropriate behavior for women and what isn't so I'd say whoever said that about you, they're not wrong.


Nope.
They're extremists, their views are tougher than mine, too much tough.
Another puppet of Chessmistress
Proud resident of The Feminist Region
85% of domestic violence survivors are women
For help against male violence:
http://www.womenhelpingwomen.org/what-i ... -violence/

User avatar
Unpredictable Galaxy
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 379
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Unpredictable Galaxy » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:22 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:
You need a hunting license for that, mate.

And this isn't a discussion of right/wrong for abortion, this is about contradictory views within the definition of feminism.


I'm not debating abortion I'm debating murder. The claim was feminism meant standing up for "all women's rights." That leads to the question "what are women's rights?" If someone says that women don't have the right to go around shooting people in the street that's not anti-woman it's simply saying that murder is one of the rights women don't have. A lot of anti-abortion rhetoric comes from a place of controlling women but I don't think all of it does and I don't think that being against abortion means you should be kicked out of the club.


Oh, if you're talking about actual murder, of course women should be allowed to- wait. I'm a guy... I'm at risk...
Want to know just what is going on with our nation? Check out our delightful FactBook!

Proud Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton supporter.

REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT!

User avatar
Arcturus Novus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6727
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arcturus Novus » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:22 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:
You need a hunting license for that, mate.

And this isn't a discussion of right/wrong for abortion, this is about contradictory views within the definition of feminism.


I'm not debating abortion I'm debating murder. The claim was feminism meant standing up for "all women's rights." That leads to the question "what are women's rights?" If someone says that women don't have the right to go around shooting people in the street that's not anti-woman it's simply saying that murder is one of the rights women don't have. A lot of anti-abortion rhetoric comes from a place of controlling women but I don't think all of it does and I don't think that being against abortion means you should be kicked out of the club.

Nobody has the right to murder except for people that the government hires to do so. And if you say to a woman, "hey, sorry that you don't want this pregnancy, but you can't do shit about it," then that's kind of... I'm not sure if misogynistic is the right word here, but it's certainly unfairly restrictive against women.
Arcy (she/her), NS' fourth-favorite transsexual communist!
"I can fix her!" cool, I'm gonna make her worse.
me - my politics - my twitter
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.

User avatar
Sacred Toast
Diplomat
 
Posts: 967
Founded: Feb 13, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Sacred Toast » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:24 pm

Sacred Toast wrote:
Arcturus Novus wrote:Then that's antifeminist. A woman- really, a person capable of pregnancy- deserves the right to bodily autonomy. If we suppress that right, then we are not acting in the interests of equality among genders.

1st I would like to saying banning abortions is like banning men from using condoms


2nd I would argue that even if I don't agree with it, it isn't antifeminist because it isn't lowering a woman's rights below men. It is, however a sketchy subject due to the lack of comparison to the male gender


Edit: original said "because it is lowering a women's right"

Just wanted to bring this back up
Last edited by Sacred Toast on Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Agnostic Theist who loves to discuss religious and political history (or future if you are so inclined)

User avatar
RFI
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Aug 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby RFI » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:26 pm

I think that being pro-life is absolutely incompatible with being Feminist.
I know that there are women who call themselves "feminists" while being pro-life but it sounds really absurd to me, like it would be someone calling herself "communist" while voting Trump.
Another puppet of Chessmistress
Proud resident of The Feminist Region
85% of domestic violence survivors are women
For help against male violence:
http://www.womenhelpingwomen.org/what-i ... -violence/

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:27 pm

RFI wrote:I think that being pro-life is absolutely incompatible with being Feminist.
I know that there are women who call themselves "feminists" while being pro-life but it sounds really absurd to me, like it would be someone calling herself "communist" while voting Trump.

Communists for Trump.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Arcturus Novus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6727
Founded: Dec 03, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arcturus Novus » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:30 pm

Galloism wrote:
RFI wrote:I think that being pro-life is absolutely incompatible with being Feminist.
I know that there are women who call themselves "feminists" while being pro-life but it sounds really absurd to me, like it would be someone calling herself "communist" while voting Trump.

Communists for Trump.

This is obviously a joke. I like that they gave him a Zizek 2016 hat, though. Nice touch.
Arcy (she/her), NS' fourth-favorite transsexual communist!
"I can fix her!" cool, I'm gonna make her worse.
me - my politics - my twitter
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.

User avatar
The States of Balloon
Senator
 
Posts: 3990
Founded: Dec 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The States of Balloon » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:31 pm

Arcturus Novus wrote:
Unpredictable Galaxy wrote:
But if someone wants to ban abortions nationwide to where there is no option of choice, what do you say there?

Then that's antifeminist. A woman- really, a person capable of pregnancy- deserves the right to bodily autonomy. If we suppress that right, then we are not acting in the interests of equality among genders.

Just stepping in to say that I believe abortion should only be allowed when the female did not consent.
:^^^^^^^^^^^^)

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:32 pm

Arcturus Novus wrote:Nobody has the right to murder except for people that the government hires to do so. And if you say to a woman, "hey, sorry that you don't want this pregnancy, but you can't do shit about it," then that's kind of... I'm not sure if misogynistic is the right word here, but it's certainly unfairly restrictive against women.

If you believe in your bones that an abortion takes a human life, that it's morally equivalent to taking a baby out behind the woodshed and shooting it, then I can understand that as an objection based purely in the nature of the act. The fact that women are uniquely effected by pregnancy doesn't mean that doesn't mean that any law addressing pregnancy is a law against women.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
RFI
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Aug 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby RFI » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:32 pm

Galloism wrote:
RFI wrote:I think that being pro-life is absolutely incompatible with being Feminist.
I know that there are women who call themselves "feminists" while being pro-life but it sounds really absurd to me, like it would be someone calling herself "communist" while voting Trump.

Communists for Trump.


Those nuts don't believe Trump is good
Trump is the essence of the neoliberal system and will further the capitalist system to demise.

It's an anti-capitalist strategy, very stupid but still a strategy.

The women who call themselves "feminists" while being pro-life aren't being pro-life as a strategy to destroy the patriarchy.
Another puppet of Chessmistress
Proud resident of The Feminist Region
85% of domestic violence survivors are women
For help against male violence:
http://www.womenhelpingwomen.org/what-i ... -violence/

User avatar
Settrah
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1234
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Settrah » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:42 pm

Being pro life and being feminist doesn't have to be an oxymoron. It's possible for a person to be feminist in the sense that they ascribe to patriarchy theory, campaign to fight against rape culture or the wage gap, and truly believe third wave feminism's commitment to ensuring gender equality through improving only woman's rights, but simultaneously having very moralistic views on human life that they feel override and take precedence on people's feelings. Their views on anti abortion isn't in the sense of 'woman are inferior, now be forced to keep your child because men say so', more in the sense of 'the miracle of life transcends our petty gender squabbles, and we actually harmonize because of it'.

Disclaimer: I don't actually agree with this, but I can't ignore that it's a thing.
Last edited by Settrah on Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I triggered a dog today by accidentally asking it if it was a good boy. Turns out it was a good aromantic demisexual neutrois. I didn't even know.

User avatar
The Grene Knyght
Minister
 
Posts: 3274
Founded: May 07, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Grene Knyght » Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:43 pm

RFI wrote:


Those nuts don't believe Trump is good
Trump is the essence of the neoliberal system and will further the capitalist system to demise.

It's an anti-capitalist strategy, very stupid but still a strategy.

I believe the term is accelerationism.
The women who call themselves "feminists" while being pro-life aren't being pro-life as a strategy to destroy the patriarchy.

That's a pretty reasonable and concise way of defining what is and isn't feminism
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Socialist Women wrote:Part of the reason you're an anarchist is because you ate too much expired food
Claorica wrote:Oh look, an antifa ancom being smartaleck
Old Tyrannia wrote:Bold words from the self-declared Leninist
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
     
PRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian Moralist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cyptopir, Fartsniffage, Gun Manufacturers, Niolia, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Plan Neonie, Stellar Colonies, Tiami, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads