NationStates

Omega America II wrote:

The Siverian Republic wrote:I was stating it towards you, but she could do that.......

Oh, right, yeah I am Christian as well, which is why I don't agree with gay marriage as stated in the Bible, although not very much. Anyways, yep.

Let's please move on.

Salus Maior wrote:

Omega America II wrote:Oh, right, yeah I am Christian as well, which is why I don't agree with gay marriage as stated in the Bible, although not very much. Anyways, yep.

Let's please move on.

I was just talking, unless that is against the law. This still relates to the topic.

Omega America II wrote:

Salus Maior wrote:
Let's please move on.

I was just talking, unless that is against the law. This still relates to the topic.

Did you have more to say, then? Or are you just being touchy?

Salus Maior wrote:

Omega America II wrote:I was just talking, unless that is against the law. This still relates to the topic.

Did you have more to say, then? Or are you just being touchy?

No, you just sounded a little quick. I'm not being touchy. Just trying to clarify.

I respect his beliefs, but if he can't do his job he needs to get a new one.
If I was in a sandwich restraunt and the Muslim cook or whoever refused me the bacon I request, he should leave, I shouldn't have to be refused my bacon.

West Dixieland wrote:I respect his beliefs, but if he can't do his job he needs to get a new one.
If I was in a sandwich restraunt and the Muslim cook or whoever refused me the bacon I request, he should leave, I shouldn't have to be refused my bacon.

That is the most hilarious thing I heard. But yet, a good point.

West Dixieland wrote:I respect his beliefs, but if he can't do his job he needs to get a new one.
If I was in a sandwich restraunt and the Muslim cook or whoever refused me the bacon I request, he should leave, I shouldn't have to be refused my bacon.

her*

I'd be surprised to find a restaurant with just one cook. Must be a coked-up cook.

The Siverian Republic wrote:

West Dixieland wrote:I respect his beliefs, but if he can't do his job he needs to get a new one.
If I was in a sandwich restraunt and the Muslim cook or whoever refused me the bacon I request, he should leave, I shouldn't have to be refused my bacon.

That is the most hilarious thing I heard. But yet, a good point.

I'll eating a BLT

Imperializt Russia wrote:

Katganistan wrote:
I know, it is extremely hypocritical especially given her out-of-wedlock twins through adultery, but it does not disqualify her from applying a stamp with her name to a computer generated sheet of paper.

I have heard that she has had four marriages, to further hammer more nails in the coffin of the "sanctity of traditional marriage" justification she's putting through, if true.

But she's "born again" so repented of all that, etc, etc. Her private life really doesn't disqualify her from doing the job, though I would question her desire to be arbiter of what is a moral marriage.

Ifreann wrote:

Imperializt Russia wrote:I have heard that she has had four marriages, to further hammer more nails in the coffin of the "sanctity of traditional marriage" justification she's putting through, if true.

I wonder how she and the judge who won't divorce people would get along.

Their relationship would go without a hitch.

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:

West Dixieland wrote:I respect his beliefs, but if he can't do his job he needs to get a new one.
If I was in a sandwich restraunt and the Muslim cook or whoever refused me the bacon I request, he should leave, I shouldn't have to be refused my bacon.

her*

I'd be surprised to find a restaurant with just one cook. Must be a coked-up cook.

Ah, *her

They're all Muslims, ok!?

The Alma Mater wrote:

Ifreann wrote:She's an elected official, so she can't be fired. She could be impeached, but the state government is, I think, in recess and aren't inclined to have an emergency session to impeach someone who'd just get re-elected.

One wonders if they would have been if the nice lady had forbidden her county to issue marriage licenses to Jews, blacks or gingers "because her religion does not approve of those".

She's forbidden them to issue marriage licenses to anyone.

Katganistan wrote:

The Alma Mater wrote:
One wonders if they would have been if the nice lady had forbidden her county to issue marriage licenses to Jews, blacks or gingers "because her religion does not approve of those".

She's forbidden them to issue marriage licenses to anyone.

And five out of six have decided to issue them. The sixth is her son. Of course, she's declared those licenses and marriages invalid because they lack her approval.

Italios wrote:Federal laws wins over individual thought, she either gives out those licenses or she leaves the job. Sadly, she took the latter.

Latter means the last mentioned opinion. She has not left the job. She has stated from her jail cell that the licenses are void.

Deuxtete wrote:and now every fucking moron will cherry pick these two lines...to make it appear like im defending this bitch.

You've been unnecessarily confrontational, and continue to flame players. Coupled with your prior warnings, it's high time you take a 24-hour chill-out. Here's one ticket, good for a *** 1-day forum ban ***. You can redeem it in that time out corner.

Farnhamia wrote:

Katganistan wrote:
She's forbidden them to issue marriage licenses to anyone.

And five out of six have decided to issue them. The sixth is her son. Of course, she's declared those licenses and marriages invalid because they lack her approval.

Oh, I know. Just saying people don't have to wonder what would happen if she refused to issue them to all these other people -- because she has.

Katganistan wrote:

Imperializt Russia wrote:I have heard that she has had four marriages, to further hammer more nails in the coffin of the "sanctity of traditional marriage" justification she's putting through, if true.

But she's "born again" so repented of all that, etc, etc. Her private life really doesn't disqualify her from doing the job, though I would question her desire to be arbiter of what is a moral marriage.

Her private life does disqualify her. She attends Church and follows some kind of moralistic code which she seeks to force others and thinks it makes her exempt from the law.

The Black Forrest wrote:

Katganistan wrote:
But she's "born again" so repented of all that, etc, etc. Her private life really doesn't disqualify her from doing the job, though I would question her desire to be arbiter of what is a moral marriage.

Her private life does disqualify her. She attends Church and follows some kind of moralistic code which she seeks to force others and thinks it makes her exempt from the law.

This just in: separation of church and state now means that people who attend the wrong churches are not allowed to run for public office. In other news: black is white and up is down.

Mysterious Stranger 2 wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
Her private life does disqualify her. She attends Church and follows some kind of moralistic code which she seeks to force others and thinks it makes her exempt from the law.

This just in: separation of church and state now means that people who attend the wrong churches are not allowed to run for public office. In other news: black is white and up is down.

How racist

The Siverian Republic wrote:

Mysterious Stranger 2 wrote:This just in: separation of church and state now means that people who attend the wrong churches are not allowed to run for public office. In other news: black is white and up is down.

How racist

Really?

Salus Maior wrote:

The Siverian Republic wrote:How racist

Really?

I needed to do something, and I saw that, so put those together and we got here.

The Siverian Republic wrote:

Salus Maior wrote:
Really?

I needed to do something, and I saw that, so put those together and we got here.

Nobody needs to do anything on this forum.

Salus Maior wrote:

The Siverian Republic wrote:I needed to do something, and I saw that, so put those together and we got here.

Nobody needs to do anything on this forum.

That is not what I meant.

I think she should be forced into rehabilitation not necessarily jail, if she refuses, then put her in jail.

Socialist Tera wrote:I think she should be forced into rehabilitation not necessarily jail, if she refuses, then put her in jail.

What a violation of her Civil Rights. That is cruel and unusual punishment for not giving gay people a license for her beliefs.