NATION

PASSWORD

2015 Canadian Election

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will you vote for in the federal election?

Conservative (Stephen Harper)
156
30%
Liberal (Justin Trudeau)
117
23%
NDP (Thomas Mulcair)
132
25%
Green Party (Elizabeth May)
25
5%
Bloc Québécois (Gilles Duceppe)
25
5%
Other party please specify
11
2%
Undecided
9
2%
I'm not voting
44
8%
 
Total votes : 519

User avatar
Haan (Ancient)
Attaché
 
Posts: 82
Founded: Jul 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Haan (Ancient) » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:01 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Haan wrote:
Didn't his mother intervene to "leave him alone" amidst all the media scrutiny he was receiving?


Lord knows at this point, it doesn't sound unlikely.

Scrapping the income-splitting, admiring China's dictatorship, and saying that budgets balance themselves..... yes, it really does not sound unlikely. :lol2:

User avatar
Padnak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6408
Founded: Feb 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Padnak » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:40 am

Canada needs more political parties

all the current ones suck
"มีใบมีดคมและจิตใจที่คมชัด!"
Have a sharp blade, and a sharper mind!
Need weapons for dubious purposes? Buy Padarm today!
San-Silvacian: Aug 11, 2011-Mar 20, 2015
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.

Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.

Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.

Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.

The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.

Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.

User avatar
Kryozerkia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 11096
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Kryozerkia » Wed Jul 29, 2015 6:18 am

Geilinor wrote:
Kryozerkia wrote:It is possible as history has a couple of very recent examples of this. Take Mulroney's Tories. When they took a majority government in 1988 they had 169 seats and 43.02% of the popular vote. In the 1993 election, they suffered a massive fall from grace (official party status requires 12 seats), landing only 2 seats with only 16% of the popular vote. Similarly the Bloc Quebec lost official party status in the last election. In 2008, they won 49 seats, only to go way down to 4 seats in 2011.

Given the polls, that kind of a collapse isn't going to happen unless they screw up badly.

I agree, however, even if they don't screw up, it is a possibility. After all, the Canadian voting public is a finicky bunch. I should know... I was going to vote Liberal but I may go back to NDP. Depends on who they toss to my riding's lions.
Problem to Report?
Game-side: Getting Help
Forum-side: Moderation
Technical issue/suggestion: Technical
A-well-a, don't you know about the bird
♦ Well, everybody knows that the bird is the word ♦
♦ A-well-a, bird, bird, b-bird's the word

Get the cheese to Sickbay

"Ok folks, show's over... Nothing to see here... Show's OH MY GOD! A horrible plane crash! Hey everybody, get a load of this flaming wreckage! Come on, crowd around, crowd around, don't be shy, crowd around!" -- Chief Wiggum

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Wed Jul 29, 2015 6:24 am

Padnak wrote:Canada needs more political parties

all the current ones suck


What even Pirate, PACT, Libertarian, Canadian Action, United Canada, and Progressive Canada?
Last edited by Fanosolia on Wed Jul 29, 2015 6:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:35 am

Kryozerkia wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Given the polls, that kind of a collapse isn't going to happen unless they screw up badly.

I agree, however, even if they don't screw up, it is a possibility. After all, the Canadian voting public is a finicky bunch. I should know... I was going to vote Liberal but I may go back to NDP. Depends on who they toss to my riding's lions.


If the election had been a year ago we would have had a Liberal majority government. They only started to slide in the polls when Harper began scaring Canadians about terrorism. They are still polling higher than they did in 2011 and I predict that unless we see an Ignatieff style implosion, the Liberals will come out of this with at least 80 seats.

I'm still planning on voting Liberal. They are the best choice to defeat the useless Conservative backbencher in my riding and I do like Trudeau's plans for democratic reform. As I mentioned before, the NDP are my second choice and I wouldn't be upset if they won. There is no way they could do any worse than Harper.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Kryozerkia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 11096
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Kryozerkia » Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:48 am

Nation of Quebec wrote:If the election had been a year ago we would have had a Liberal majority government. They only started to slide in the polls when Harper began scaring Canadians about terrorism. They are still polling higher than they did in 2011 and I predict that unless we see an Ignatieff style implosion, the Liberals will come out of this with at least 80 seats.

I'm still planning on voting Liberal. They are the best choice to defeat the useless Conservative backbencher in my riding and I do like Trudeau's plans for democratic reform. As I mentioned before, the NDP are my second choice and I wouldn't be upset if they won. There is no way they could do any worse than Harper.

Terrorism. The Con's favourite boogeyman de jour because hatin' on commies is so 1950s, and it's political incorrect to pick on foreigners or any particular religion, but we know terrorism in the Con's playbook is just a polite euphemism. After all, it's political suicide to name a specific group.

Voting Liberal is probably sound strategy. It's tragic but it's the reality of Canadian politics. We've got one right-wing party and the left is fragmented between moderate centrism peppered with rational leftist policy to neon-pink socialism that would bleed red if the knife cut the thin facade of their platform - not that there's anything wrong with socialism. A successful nation needs more than right-wing politics to be successful. The human element is often forgotten in the race to the bottom line. If both sides of the spectrum were equally fragmented, we'd have a better balance and better representation. After all, some people who voted for the Tories didn't do it for the regressive social policy but for the fiscal policy and tax breaks. The right was balanced when it was the Reform Party and the Progressive Conservatives. Harper destroyed that balance.
Problem to Report?
Game-side: Getting Help
Forum-side: Moderation
Technical issue/suggestion: Technical
A-well-a, don't you know about the bird
♦ Well, everybody knows that the bird is the word ♦
♦ A-well-a, bird, bird, b-bird's the word

Get the cheese to Sickbay

"Ok folks, show's over... Nothing to see here... Show's OH MY GOD! A horrible plane crash! Hey everybody, get a load of this flaming wreckage! Come on, crowd around, crowd around, don't be shy, crowd around!" -- Chief Wiggum

User avatar
Lancaster of Wessex
Senator
 
Posts: 4999
Founded: Feb 21, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lancaster of Wessex » Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:54 am

Kryozerkia wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:If the election had been a year ago we would have had a Liberal majority government. They only started to slide in the polls when Harper began scaring Canadians about terrorism. They are still polling higher than they did in 2011 and I predict that unless we see an Ignatieff style implosion, the Liberals will come out of this with at least 80 seats.

I'm still planning on voting Liberal. They are the best choice to defeat the useless Conservative backbencher in my riding and I do like Trudeau's plans for democratic reform. As I mentioned before, the NDP are my second choice and I wouldn't be upset if they won. There is no way they could do any worse than Harper.

Terrorism. The Con's favourite boogeyman de jour because hatin' on commies is so 1950s, and it's political incorrect to pick on foreigners or any particular religion, but we know terrorism in the Con's playbook is just a polite euphemism. After all, it's political suicide to name a specific group.

Voting Liberal is probably sound strategy. It's tragic but it's the reality of Canadian politics. We've got one right-wing party and the left is fragmented between moderate centrism peppered with rational leftist policy to neon-pink socialism that would bleed red if the knife cut the thin facade of their platform - not that there's anything wrong with socialism. A successful nation needs more than right-wing politics to be successful. The human element is often forgotten in the race to the bottom line. If both sides of the spectrum were equally fragmented, we'd have a better balance and better representation. After all, some people who voted for the Tories didn't do it for the regressive social policy but for the fiscal policy and tax breaks. The right was balanced when it was the Reform Party and the Progressive Conservatives. Harper destroyed that balance.


It's because of a united Right that I see almost no alternative, should the NDP and/or Libs falter this election, but to unite the Liberals and NDP if they want to dethrone the Conservatives. The Greens are irrelevant (and always will be, unfortunately (I guess)), and Canada is quickly on its way save for maybe some BQ seats (if Gilles can work his magic in La Belle Province) to becoming a two party state a la the USA.
Last edited by Lancaster of Wessex on Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lancaster.
Duke of the Most Ancient and Noble House of Lancaster of Wessex

The Most High, Potent, and Noble Prince, Lancaster, By the Grace of God, Duke of Wessex, Protector of the Enclaved Pious Estates of The Church of Wessex, Lord of Saint Aldhelm Islands, Prince and Great Steward of Celtic Wessex, Keeper of the Great Seal of the Duchy and House of Lancaster of Wessex, Sovereign of the Most Ancient and Illustrious Order of the Gold Gryphon, etc.

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Wed Jul 29, 2015 10:13 am

Kryozerkia wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:If the election had been a year ago we would have had a Liberal majority government. They only started to slide in the polls when Harper began scaring Canadians about terrorism. They are still polling higher than they did in 2011 and I predict that unless we see an Ignatieff style implosion, the Liberals will come out of this with at least 80 seats.

I'm still planning on voting Liberal. They are the best choice to defeat the useless Conservative backbencher in my riding and I do like Trudeau's plans for democratic reform. As I mentioned before, the NDP are my second choice and I wouldn't be upset if they won. There is no way they could do any worse than Harper.

Terrorism. The Con's favourite boogeyman de jour because hatin' on commies is so 1950s, and it's political incorrect to pick on foreigners or any particular religion, but we know terrorism in the Con's playbook is just a polite euphemism. After all, it's political suicide to name a specific group.

Voting Liberal is probably sound strategy. It's tragic but it's the reality of Canadian politics. We've got one right-wing party and the left is fragmented between moderate centrism peppered with rational leftist policy to neon-pink socialism that would bleed red if the knife cut the thin facade of their platform - not that there's anything wrong with socialism. A successful nation needs more than right-wing politics to be successful. The human element is often forgotten in the race to the bottom line. If both sides of the spectrum were equally fragmented, we'd have a better balance and better representation. After all, some people who voted for the Tories didn't do it for the regressive social policy but for the fiscal policy and tax breaks. The right was balanced when it was the Reform Party and the Progressive Conservatives. Harper destroyed that balance.


This is why I'm hoping that the Wildrose begin to run federally. It's still surprising that there is no other right-wing option. The Libertarians realistically have no chance of ever getting elected anywhere and you'd think that there would be a small-government, anti-government spending conservative party in Canada. As we've seen of the Harper Conservatives of the past decade, they are anything but small government and anti-government spending.

It's also why First Past The Post is a broken and outdated system for a multi-party democracy like Canada. It encourages things like vote splitting and strategic voting while not being the true will of the people. The NDP support Proportional Representation while Trudeau prefers ranked ballots, but has promised to look into other options.

Regardless, I don't think any party will have a majority at this point according to the polls, but I'm eager to see how that changes once the writ is dropped (which if the rumors are true, might be as early as next week and after the first debate on August 6.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:14 am

Ah so Ottawa has decided to grant $114 million to UoT for their new stem cell research program. The sad thing is that'll probably be enough to allow the Cons to argue that they care about Canadian science research and get away with it. Despite, ya know, absolutely gutting our science industry, especially those related to the environment and biology but really they've all been kind of fucked.
Last edited by Napkiraly on Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:15 am

Napkiraly wrote:Ah so Ottawa has decided to grant $114 million to UoT for their new stem cell research program. The sad thing is that'll probably be enough to allow the Cons to argue that they care about Canadian science research and get away with it. Despite, ya know, absolutely gutting our science industry (especially those related to the environment and biology but really they've all been kind of fucked).

Let's burn all of Environment Canada's archives FOR SCIENCE!
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Post War America
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7999
Founded: Sep 05, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Post War America » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:18 am

Because I'm not Canadian I will sit here... wish I was Canadian and look over my own shitty choices for governation.
Ceterum autem censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
Proudly Banned from the 10000 Islands
For those who care
A PMT Social Democratic Genepunk/Post Cyberpunk Nation the practices big (atomic) stick diplomacy
Not Post-Apocalyptic
Economic Left: -9.62
Social Libertarian: -6.00
Unrepentant New England Yankee
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:19 am

Ainin wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Ah so Ottawa has decided to grant $114 million to UoT for their new stem cell research program. The sad thing is that'll probably be enough to allow the Cons to argue that they care about Canadian science research and get away with it. Despite, ya know, absolutely gutting our science industry (especially those related to the environment and biology but really they've all been kind of fucked).

Let's burn all of Environment Canada's archives FOR SCIENCE!

WE BURNED ALL OF THAT PAPER AND THE ICE CAPS ARE STILL HERE!!!1111!!!! GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX

I think Trudeau's greatest moment remains the time he called Peter Kent a piece of shit in the House of Commons.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:20 am

Post War America wrote:Because I'm not Canadian I will sit here... wish I was Canadian and look over my own shitty choices for governation.

Based off of what I've seen in this thread, most Canadians aren't enthusiastic about their choices.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:33 am

Geilinor wrote:
Post War America wrote:Because I'm not Canadian I will sit here... wish I was Canadian and look over my own shitty choices for governation.

Based off of what I've seen in this thread, most Canadians aren't enthusiastic about their choices.

Well each party is rather shite in its own way (the Cons taking taking the cake however). The NDP and Liberals are certainly better than Harper and his lot. Though we still should go for PR or at the least STV. And the Senate should either be elected with the same amount of Senators per province or scrapped all together.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:36 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Based off of what I've seen in this thread, most Canadians aren't enthusiastic about their choices.

Well each party is rather shite in its own way (the Cons taking taking the cake however). The NDP and Liberals are certainly better than Harper and his lot. Though we still should go for PR or at the least STV. And the Senate should either be elected with the same amount of Senators per province or scrapped all together.

Yeah, Senate is just a bad idea. The system has a lot of good parts, but is really in need of serious reform.

User avatar
Gristol-Serkonos
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1596
Founded: Jun 07, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Gristol-Serkonos » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:42 am

Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:42 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Based off of what I've seen in this thread, most Canadians aren't enthusiastic about their choices.

Well each party is rather shite in its own way (the Cons taking taking the cake however). The NDP and Liberals are certainly better than Harper and his lot. Though we still should go for PR or at the least STV. And the Senate should either be elected with the same amount of Senators per province or scrapped all together.

In an ideal world, the Senate would be killed with fire. Unfortunately, that's essentially impossible because it requires the unanimous consent of the provinces. Quebec won't do it without Meech Lake 3.0: Third Time's the Charm? and Ontario won't do it period.
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:44 am

Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.


That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.

The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:47 am

Ainin wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Well each party is rather shite in its own way (the Cons taking taking the cake however). The NDP and Liberals are certainly better than Harper and his lot. Though we still should go for PR or at the least STV. And the Senate should either be elected with the same amount of Senators per province or scrapped all together.

In an ideal world, the Senate would be killed with fire. Unfortunately, that's essentially impossible because it requires the unanimous consent of the provinces. Quebec won't do it without Meech Lake 3.0: Third Time's the Charm? and Ontario won't do it period.

Yeah which is why I support equal number of Senators per province. That'd attract the smaller provinces and would kind of push Ontario and Quebec due to the desire of reform and probably not wanting to come across as bigger assholes than they already do to other provinces (especially on this topic with all that has been going on).

Apparently Canada is a pain in the ass to run according to former government officials.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:47 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.


That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.

The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.

Which in itself is delicious, delicious irony... since the Liberals only voted for C-51 en masse to prevent Harper going after them as soft on terrorism in the campaign. I certainly hope they fired whatever idiots came up with that idea.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:48 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.


That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.

The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.

Trudeau: "But, but... Muh preventing terrorism! Come back, I saved you from ISIS!"
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Gristol-Serkonos
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1596
Founded: Jun 07, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Gristol-Serkonos » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:49 am

Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.


That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.

The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.

Don't get me started with Trudeau's pledge to legalize pot.

I have nothing against legalizing pot, but is that really our current priority right now?

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:50 am

Gristol-Serkonos wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.

The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.

Don't get me started with Trudeau's pledge to legalize pot.

I have nothing against legalizing pot, but is that really our current priority right now?

Can't tell if you're sarcastically pretending to be Conservative attack ad...

I mean Justin is an idiot, but the whole legalizing pot thing is one piece of a larger platform.
Last edited by Oneracon on Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:51 am

Oneracon wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.

The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.

Which in itself is delicious, delicious irony... since the Liberals only voted for C-51 en masse to prevent Harper going after them as soft on terrorism in the campaign. I certainly hope they fired whatever idiots came up with that idea.


Trudeau, actually. He shouldn't be party leader if the Liberals want to bounce back in October.

BTW, does anyone watch the Canadian political ads? I thought the ones in America were cheesy and fearmongering, but holy christ canada... :lol:
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

User avatar
Liberty and Linguistics
Senator
 
Posts: 4565
Founded: Jan 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:52 am

Geilinor wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.

The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.

Trudeau: "But, but... Muh preventing terrorism! Come back, I saved you from ISIS!"


Maybe all along, Trudeau wanted the NDP to win in 2015, to get back at his dad for forcing him into politics.
I am: Cynic, Depressive, Junior in HS, Arizonan, Sarcastic, Wannabe Psychologist, Lover of Cinema and Rum.


Ziggy played guitar....
For ISIS | On Israel and its settlements | Flat Taxes are beneficial for all | OOC, Baby | Probably Accurate.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Dimetrodon Empire, Elwher, Grinning Dragon, Lans Isles, Philjia, Port Carverton, Tarsonis, Technoscience Leftwing, The Vooperian Union

Advertisement

Remove ads