Scrapping the income-splitting, admiring China's dictatorship, and saying that budgets balance themselves..... yes, it really does not sound unlikely.
Advertisement
by Haan (Ancient) » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:01 am
by Padnak » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:40 am
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.
Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.
Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.
Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.
The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.
Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.
by Kryozerkia » Wed Jul 29, 2015 6:18 am
Geilinor wrote:Kryozerkia wrote:It is possible as history has a couple of very recent examples of this. Take Mulroney's Tories. When they took a majority government in 1988 they had 169 seats and 43.02% of the popular vote. In the 1993 election, they suffered a massive fall from grace (official party status requires 12 seats), landing only 2 seats with only 16% of the popular vote. Similarly the Bloc Quebec lost official party status in the last election. In 2008, they won 49 seats, only to go way down to 4 seats in 2011.
Given the polls, that kind of a collapse isn't going to happen unless they screw up badly.
by Fanosolia » Wed Jul 29, 2015 6:24 am
by Nation of Quebec » Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:35 am
Kryozerkia wrote:Geilinor wrote:Given the polls, that kind of a collapse isn't going to happen unless they screw up badly.
I agree, however, even if they don't screw up, it is a possibility. After all, the Canadian voting public is a finicky bunch. I should know... I was going to vote Liberal but I may go back to NDP. Depends on who they toss to my riding's lions.
by Kryozerkia » Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:48 am
Nation of Quebec wrote:If the election had been a year ago we would have had a Liberal majority government. They only started to slide in the polls when Harper began scaring Canadians about terrorism. They are still polling higher than they did in 2011 and I predict that unless we see an Ignatieff style implosion, the Liberals will come out of this with at least 80 seats.
I'm still planning on voting Liberal. They are the best choice to defeat the useless Conservative backbencher in my riding and I do like Trudeau's plans for democratic reform. As I mentioned before, the NDP are my second choice and I wouldn't be upset if they won. There is no way they could do any worse than Harper.
by Lancaster of Wessex » Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:54 am
Kryozerkia wrote:Nation of Quebec wrote:If the election had been a year ago we would have had a Liberal majority government. They only started to slide in the polls when Harper began scaring Canadians about terrorism. They are still polling higher than they did in 2011 and I predict that unless we see an Ignatieff style implosion, the Liberals will come out of this with at least 80 seats.
I'm still planning on voting Liberal. They are the best choice to defeat the useless Conservative backbencher in my riding and I do like Trudeau's plans for democratic reform. As I mentioned before, the NDP are my second choice and I wouldn't be upset if they won. There is no way they could do any worse than Harper.
Terrorism. The Con's favourite boogeyman de jour because hatin' on commies is so 1950s, and it's political incorrect to pick on foreigners or any particular religion, but we know terrorism in the Con's playbook is just a polite euphemism. After all, it's political suicide to name a specific group.
Voting Liberal is probably sound strategy. It's tragic but it's the reality of Canadian politics. We've got one right-wing party and the left is fragmented between moderate centrism peppered with rational leftist policy to neon-pink socialism that would bleed red if the knife cut the thin facade of their platform - not that there's anything wrong with socialism. A successful nation needs more than right-wing politics to be successful. The human element is often forgotten in the race to the bottom line. If both sides of the spectrum were equally fragmented, we'd have a better balance and better representation. After all, some people who voted for the Tories didn't do it for the regressive social policy but for the fiscal policy and tax breaks. The right was balanced when it was the Reform Party and the Progressive Conservatives. Harper destroyed that balance.
by Nation of Quebec » Wed Jul 29, 2015 10:13 am
Kryozerkia wrote:Nation of Quebec wrote:If the election had been a year ago we would have had a Liberal majority government. They only started to slide in the polls when Harper began scaring Canadians about terrorism. They are still polling higher than they did in 2011 and I predict that unless we see an Ignatieff style implosion, the Liberals will come out of this with at least 80 seats.
I'm still planning on voting Liberal. They are the best choice to defeat the useless Conservative backbencher in my riding and I do like Trudeau's plans for democratic reform. As I mentioned before, the NDP are my second choice and I wouldn't be upset if they won. There is no way they could do any worse than Harper.
Terrorism. The Con's favourite boogeyman de jour because hatin' on commies is so 1950s, and it's political incorrect to pick on foreigners or any particular religion, but we know terrorism in the Con's playbook is just a polite euphemism. After all, it's political suicide to name a specific group.
Voting Liberal is probably sound strategy. It's tragic but it's the reality of Canadian politics. We've got one right-wing party and the left is fragmented between moderate centrism peppered with rational leftist policy to neon-pink socialism that would bleed red if the knife cut the thin facade of their platform - not that there's anything wrong with socialism. A successful nation needs more than right-wing politics to be successful. The human element is often forgotten in the race to the bottom line. If both sides of the spectrum were equally fragmented, we'd have a better balance and better representation. After all, some people who voted for the Tories didn't do it for the regressive social policy but for the fiscal policy and tax breaks. The right was balanced when it was the Reform Party and the Progressive Conservatives. Harper destroyed that balance.
by Napkiraly » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:14 am
by Ainin » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:15 am
Napkiraly wrote:Ah so Ottawa has decided to grant $114 million to UoT for their new stem cell research program. The sad thing is that'll probably be enough to allow the Cons to argue that they care about Canadian science research and get away with it. Despite, ya know, absolutely gutting our science industry (especially those related to the environment and biology but really they've all been kind of fucked).
by Post War America » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:18 am
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.
by Napkiraly » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:19 am
Ainin wrote:Napkiraly wrote:Ah so Ottawa has decided to grant $114 million to UoT for their new stem cell research program. The sad thing is that'll probably be enough to allow the Cons to argue that they care about Canadian science research and get away with it. Despite, ya know, absolutely gutting our science industry (especially those related to the environment and biology but really they've all been kind of fucked).
Let's burn all of Environment Canada's archives FOR SCIENCE!
by Geilinor » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:20 am
Post War America wrote:Because I'm not Canadian I will sit here... wish I was Canadian and look over my own shitty choices for governation.
by Napkiraly » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:33 am
by MERIZoC » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:36 am
Napkiraly wrote:Geilinor wrote:Based off of what I've seen in this thread, most Canadians aren't enthusiastic about their choices.
Well each party is rather shite in its own way (the Cons taking taking the cake however). The NDP and Liberals are certainly better than Harper and his lot. Though we still should go for PR or at the least STV. And the Senate should either be elected with the same amount of Senators per province or scrapped all together.
by Gristol-Serkonos » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:42 am
by Ainin » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:42 am
Napkiraly wrote:Geilinor wrote:Based off of what I've seen in this thread, most Canadians aren't enthusiastic about their choices.
Well each party is rather shite in its own way (the Cons taking taking the cake however). The NDP and Liberals are certainly better than Harper and his lot. Though we still should go for PR or at the least STV. And the Senate should either be elected with the same amount of Senators per province or scrapped all together.
by Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:44 am
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.
by Napkiraly » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:47 am
Ainin wrote:Napkiraly wrote:Well each party is rather shite in its own way (the Cons taking taking the cake however). The NDP and Liberals are certainly better than Harper and his lot. Though we still should go for PR or at the least STV. And the Senate should either be elected with the same amount of Senators per province or scrapped all together.
In an ideal world, the Senate would be killed with fire. Unfortunately, that's essentially impossible because it requires the unanimous consent of the provinces. Quebec won't do it without Meech Lake 3.0: Third Time's the Charm? and Ontario won't do it period.
by Oneracon » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:47 am
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.
That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.
The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Geilinor » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:48 am
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.
That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.
The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.
by Gristol-Serkonos » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:49 am
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Considering the Liberals supported Bill C-51 (which is possibly the worst anti-terrorism legislation ever produced by a Canadian Parliament) voting for the NDP might be the best option.
That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.
The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.
by Oneracon » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:50 am
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.
The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.
Don't get me started with Trudeau's pledge to legalize pot.
I have nothing against legalizing pot, but is that really our current priority right now?
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:51 am
Oneracon wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
That bill alone drove countless Liberals away from the party, and to the NDP.
The Liberals shot themselves in the foot from an electoral standpoint.
Which in itself is delicious, delicious irony... since the Liberals only voted for C-51 en masse to prevent Harper going after them as soft on terrorism in the campaign. I certainly hope they fired whatever idiots came up with that idea.
by Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:52 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Dimetrodon Empire, Elwher, Grinning Dragon, Lans Isles, Philjia, Port Carverton, Tarsonis, Technoscience Leftwing, The Vooperian Union
Advertisement