Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:04 pmSomeone needs to go back in time and Kill Dick Cheney!
Firsthome wrote:Someone needs to go back in time and Kill Dick Cheney!
when you try so hard and don't succeed
NationStates
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Why do you hate Obama?
Page 31 of 46
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:04 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:04 pmwhen you try so hard and don't succeed
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:05 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:05 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:06 pmThe Nuclear Fist wrote:Alsheb wrote:
It kinda does. Violent colonisation, racial segregation and institutional racism... sounds a lot like how most US states came to be
Except that the US has largely moved past that point in our history. So a theoretical American annexation of Israel wouldn't likely go down that road.
But you know, cheap shots at history is a decent enough substitute for having anything intelligent or meaningful to say, I guess.
G mate, 6/10. 3edgy5me.
Well it's beyond me why the US would possible want or have any right to outright annex any part of the Middle East anyway, so I assumed (and hope) that you were mostly joking about the annexation of Israel into the US part.
For the most part, Israel is sort of an American puppet state anyway. They are completely dependent on the US for pretty much everything, from monetary aid to military to innovation. And the US has a nice little corner in the Middle East they can use to keep the Arabs down (or kill them by the thousands), which is good for the stability of petroleum exports to the US. I wouldn't know what extra advantage the US could possible hope to get if they were to officialise the annexation of Israel as a US state. Seems rather redundant to me.
As to "going down that road", the zionists have been going down the road of colonisation, mass murder and ethnic cleansing for the past 65 years already. With permanent thumbs up from the US. We're not so much talking about a possible dystopic future. It's grim reality.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:06 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:07 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:31 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:33 pmFirsthome wrote:Someone needs to go back in time and Kill Dick Cheney!
You can't kill that which has no life.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:33 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:35 pmAlsheb wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:Except that the US has largely moved past that point in our history. So a theoretical American annexation of Israel wouldn't likely go down that road.
But you know, cheap shots at history is a decent enough substitute for having anything intelligent or meaningful to say, I guess.
G mate, 6/10. 3edgy5me.
Well it's beyond me why the US would possible want or have any right to outright annex any part of the Middle East anyway, so I assumed (and hope) that you were mostly joking about the annexation of Israel into the US part.
For the most part, Israel is sort of an American puppet state anyway. They are completely dependent on the US for pretty much everything, from monetary aid to military to innovation. And the US has a nice little corner in the Middle East they can use to keep the Arabs down (or kill them by the thousands), which is good for the stability of petroleum exports to the US. I wouldn't know what extra advantage the US could possible hope to get if they were to officialise the annexation of Israel as a US state. Seems rather redundant to me.
As to "going down that road", the zionists have been going down the road of colonisation, mass murder and ethnic cleansing for the past 65 years already. With permanent thumbs up from the US. We're not so much talking about a possible dystopic future. It's grim reality.
Well, if we annexed them, then we could force them to give us more Dreidels and weird Jewish food. Other then that, not much advantage.
And yes, we were joking.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:37 pmEarl of Sandwich IV wrote:New Jordslag wrote:Developed by Israel. Funded by America.
And Obama cut funding to Israel/US missle defense cooperations.
Obama’s Cut to Israeli Missile Defense Aid Reflects Larger Policy
He threw Israel under the bus.
Uh, did you bother to read your own article? It's entire point is that the funding cuts weren't aimed at Israel at all, and were just a reflection of Obamas skepticism regarding missile defense in general.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:41 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:48 pmHe's not doing a good enough job with the student loan crisis. I do not care if he has to resort to Machiavellian tactics to properly handle the situation, he just needs to properly handle it.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:53 pmCrimiea wrote:He's not doing a good enough job with the student loan crisis. I do not care if he has to resort to Machiavellian tactics to properly handle the situation, he just needs to properly handle it.
Exactly what do you think he should do?
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:55 pmPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:57 pmRemove the interest rates on student loans with an executive order, enforce it with the national guard.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 3:13 pmNew Werpland wrote:(Image)
This is the dumbest thread I've made yet, but still I'd like to talk about it. As we all know Obama has consistently low approval ratings. I for one see no reason to hate him so much, everything he passed was bipartisan, and none of it seems to have caused economic catastrophe. I believe that all this hate against Obama has been caused by populist conservative media that can't tolerate anything that isn't on their standards, and even Liberals now want to jump on the Obama hater wagon by saying he's not leftist enough. Of course I don't think Obama is flawless, liberals expected him to be flawless in 2008, and that obviously hasn't happened. The point here though shouldn't be to just praise him though, I would like this thread to be varied with reasonable criticism from our left and right wing friends on nsg.
To be honest, he's just another nameless politician without any face and with contradictory motives.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:10 amNo Obama hate posts for a whole day? Interesting.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:50 pmBush,Regan,Carter,Obama all the same. He has blood on his hands the blood of Iraqi and Syrian children. He is full of empty promises what happened to closing Guantanamo? And pulling out of Iraq MPs and Trainers is not a pull out that means there are US forces in Iraq. And he makes so many stupid things up to try to cover up.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:51 pmHe is, in short, a pathetic shill.
But hey, he beats Hillary.
But hey, he beats Hillary.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:53 pmFirsthome wrote:Someone needs to go back in time and Kill Dick Cheney!
If I recall Dick Cheney's final form is this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=832UnfMJyKs
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:53 pmYeah probably isn't as bad as her.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:59 pmObama imho will be the greatest president of the 21st century. The president of the current is almost always unilaterally hated or criticized, it isn't until you hold a macro viewpoint in the context of history do you truly begin to appreciate presidencies.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:31 pm-United Islamic Emirate- wrote:Bush,Regan,Carter,Obama all the same.
Carter? Really? And you left out Clinton.
He has blood on his hands the blood of Iraqi and Syrian children.
He's largely withdrawn from Iraq, and it should be pointed out that these Syrian children were already being killed. He was trying for a faster transition.
He is full of empty promises what happened to closing Guantanamo?
Congress.
And pulling out of Iraq MPs and Trainers is not a pull out that means there are US forces in Iraq.
Yes. He withdrew combat troops. It's common to leave behind a small force to assist with security and transition. We did the same after WWII.
And he makes so many stupid things up to try to cover up.
Such as?