NATION

PASSWORD

"Family Values"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Rhodisia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 451
Founded: Sep 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

"Family Values"

Postby Rhodisia » Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:58 am

According to Wikipedia, family values are traditional or cultural values (that is, values passed on from generation to generation within families) that pertain to the family's structure, function, roles, beliefs, attitudes, and ideals.

Like anything else in sociology, many things are left open to interpretation. Conservative Christian fundamentalists say that a "traditional family" involves a middle-class family with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother, raising their biological children. Any deviation from this family model is considered a "nontraditional family".

What say you, NSG? What are "family values?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro: Sortition, gold standard, small and efficient government, concise laws, community policing, responsible private gun ownership, school choice, absolutely free market, low taxes, net neutrality, press freedom, etc

Against: Dynasties, fiat currency, excessive bureaucracy, verbose laws, police militarization, gun control, state-only education, crony capitalism, high taxes, net non-neutrality, censorship, empire, etc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

User avatar
The Leodensian Republic
Envoy
 
Posts: 239
Founded: Dec 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Leodensian Republic » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:08 am

A buzzword for conservatives.

User avatar
Ripoll
Minister
 
Posts: 2452
Founded: Nov 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Ripoll » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:16 am

Rhodisia wrote:According to Wikipedia, family values are traditional or cultural values (that is, values passed on from generation to generation within families) that pertain to the family's structure, function, roles, beliefs, attitudes, and ideals.

Like anything else in sociology, many things are left open to interpretation. Conservative Christian fundamentalists say that a "traditional family" involves a middle-class family with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother, raising their biological children. Any deviation from this family model is considered a "nontraditional family".

What say you, NSG? What are "family values?"


Family Values should be associated with societal values rather than relying on previous ancestral blood unless your family in general is some what above societal values.

Parent's need to be raising smart, well cultured, and confident young men and women. Anything below that is neglect for your child.

The traditional American family is just something for people to look up too, it's an idea people should strive for. But overall, their goal should be happiness, productivity, and integrity. If a white Pickett fence, Lincoln in the driveway, Golden Retriever on the lawn, inground swimming pool in the back, 2 story colonial style house does that for them? Good!

Nothing wrong with the conservative idea of a strong willed middle class family with traditional family make up.
- Moderate Right Winger
- New Englander Liberal
-Profoundly Patriotic
-Objective and Pragmatic

I align myself with the democratic party, but I respect various moderate conservatives such as John Huntsman, John McCain, etc.

Political Compass | Economic 1.88 Social 0.77

Pro - Capitalism, Adam Smith, Mixed Economies, Radical Centrism, Moderates, Free and Fair trade, Affordable Care Act, Globalisation, Democracy.

Con - Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Political Extremism, Self Righteous Atheists, Central Planning, libertarians, gold standard, and Ron Paul

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:23 am

Well I think family values is a term nearly always used to describe the traditional family unit. Outside this its not a very useful term family values to my mind differ between families; the things that my immediate family value differs to plenty of my friends and neighbors despite the fact we've all grown up in the same soceital culture.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:25 am

Rhodisia wrote:Conservative Christian fundamentalists say that a "traditional family" involves a middle-class family with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother, raising their biological children. Any deviation from this family model is considered a "nontraditional family".

So... it's a conservative euphemism for "a woman's place is in the kitchen and gay marriage is icky"?
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
-United Islamic Emirate-
Diplomat
 
Posts: 772
Founded: Nov 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby -United Islamic Emirate- » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:26 am

Wikipedia explains it perfectly and American nationalists use it incorrectly I think they're trying to say American Family Values because I have my own set of family values which is very different.
نحن أبناء الإسلام التي أثارها الهدى والنور من الاسود مثل الشيخ أسامة ورفيقه أيمن مليئة شجاعة مثل أبو مصعب والأمير خطاب نموذجنا دور محمد الحبيب هو لدينا الضوء والمعلم ويترك كافة الأمر إلى الله
GENERATION 29: The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
I support a FreeSyriaDo you?
http://ahraralsham.net/
Want to add me on kik? send me a TG!

User avatar
Brillnuck
Diplomat
 
Posts: 815
Founded: Jan 22, 2012
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Brillnuck » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:28 am

Ripoll wrote:
Rhodisia wrote:According to Wikipedia, family values are traditional or cultural values (that is, values passed on from generation to generation within families) that pertain to the family's structure, function, roles, beliefs, attitudes, and ideals.

Like anything else in sociology, many things are left open to interpretation. Conservative Christian fundamentalists say that a "traditional family" involves a middle-class family with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother, raising their biological children. Any deviation from this family model is considered a "nontraditional family".

What say you, NSG? What are "family values?"


Family Values should be associated with societal values rather than relying on previous ancestral blood unless your family in general is some what above societal values.

Parent's need to be raising smart, well cultured, and confident young men and women. Anything below that is neglect for your child.

The traditional American family is just something for people to look up too, it's an idea people should strive for. But overall, their goal should be happiness, productivity, and integrity. If a white Pickett fence, Lincoln in the driveway, Golden Retriever on the lawn, inground swimming pool in the back, 2 story colonial style house does that for them? Good!

Nothing wrong with the conservative idea of a strong willed middle class family with traditional family make up.

Agreed. The next generation needs to be confident as well as well cultured and smart.

Greater-London wrote:Well I think family values is a term nearly always used to describe the traditional family unit. Outside this its not a very useful term family values to my mind differ between families; the things that my immediate family value differs to plenty of my friends and neighbors despite the fact we've all grown up in the same soceital culture.

Agreed. Family Values can differ between family-to-family. One might be a single parent, but they might raise their children to be smart, well cultured and confident.
He/Him|British|Market Socialist|Internationalist
Brillnish Political Parties|Status of the Brillnish House of Commons
Pro: Democratic Socialism, Left-Libertarianism, EU, NATO, Humanitarian Interventionism
Anti: Capitalism, Monarchism, Tories, Corbyn, Leninism, Russia, China, Dictatorships, Authoritarianism

User avatar
Rhodisia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 451
Founded: Sep 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodisia » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:30 am

European Socialist Republic wrote:So... it's a conservative euphemism for "a woman's place is in the kitchen and gay marriage is icky"?

It is sociology. Interpret it how you will.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro: Sortition, gold standard, small and efficient government, concise laws, community policing, responsible private gun ownership, school choice, absolutely free market, low taxes, net neutrality, press freedom, etc

Against: Dynasties, fiat currency, excessive bureaucracy, verbose laws, police militarization, gun control, state-only education, crony capitalism, high taxes, net non-neutrality, censorship, empire, etc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

User avatar
Shaggtopia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 404
Founded: Dec 22, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Shaggtopia » Mon Dec 22, 2014 8:46 am

:ugeek: "Family Values" a buzzword that serve no greater or lesser function than do establish and enforce a singular ideal or status quo, in no way is the concept of "Family Values" the end all be all universal archetype with which individuals should compare themselves for the simple fact that "Family Values" is inherently exclusionary to members of society that already don't fit the ideals of the status quo in other areas of their lives.
Furthermore, while the Conservative Ideal has been detailed earlier in this Forum it is far from the only set of "Family Values" that exists, and each other set is likewise flawed in it's restriction of behaviors that are deemed Deviant (like working mothers, interracial adoption, and gay marriage are Deviant to a Conservative's "Traditional Family Values") this is unavoidable because to praise one set of Ideals over others is to backhandedly condemn those others existence. :ugeek:
From the Desk of The Speaker
Loyal Face of The Grand Nobody
John LeGrand III
Shaggtopia, Apathy

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:33 am

Rhodisia wrote:
European Socialist Republic wrote:So... it's a conservative euphemism for "a woman's place is in the kitchen and gay marriage is icky"?

It is sociology. Interpret it how you will.

Explain.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163896
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:37 am

"Family Values" is how certain elements of conservatism express their belief that theirs is the only right and proper form of family.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Kazirstan
Senator
 
Posts: 3990
Founded: Apr 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kazirstan » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:43 am

The Leodensian Republic wrote:A buzzword for conservatives.

User avatar
Rhodisia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 451
Founded: Sep 27, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodisia » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:45 am

Deian salazar wrote:Huh?
Thought this thread was a Drafted proposal for a new Issue. :blink:

no
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro: Sortition, gold standard, small and efficient government, concise laws, community policing, responsible private gun ownership, school choice, absolutely free market, low taxes, net neutrality, press freedom, etc

Against: Dynasties, fiat currency, excessive bureaucracy, verbose laws, police militarization, gun control, state-only education, crony capitalism, high taxes, net non-neutrality, censorship, empire, etc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

User avatar
Central Kadigan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 639
Founded: Apr 08, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Central Kadigan » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:47 am

Rhodisia wrote:Conservative Christian fundamentalists say that a "traditional family" involves a middle-class family with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother, raising their biological children. Any deviation from this family model is considered a "nontraditional family".

A family on a single income could barely survive, let alone be "middle-class". Like most "Conservative Christian" ideas - this one is also pure fantasy.
The Nomocratic Commonwealth of Central Kadigan
We are free and happy, but poor as dirt!
Civil Rights 80/100 - Economy 58/100 - Political Freedoms 88/100

Economic Left/Right: -5.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.23
“Cosmopolitan Social Democrat”
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic: -12%
Secular/Fundamentalist: -60%
Visionary/Reactionary: -42%
Anarchist/Authoritarian: -38%
Communistic/Capitalistic: -23%
Pacifist/Militaristic: -13%
Ecological/Anthropocentric: +3%
“Hard-Core Liberal”
Personal Score: 80%
Economic Score: 17%
97% Green
96% Socialist
95% Democrat
57% Libertarian
16% Constitution
11% Republican - I have no explanation why this number is so high

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:54 am

Family values (to me) are:

* opposition to abortion (when the mother's life is not in danger and/or when the child is non-viable)

* opposition to same- sex marriage (they can have their civil unions but they should not have a right to adopt children).

*a living wage (bring back the breadwinner model - but whether the breadwinner is male or female is unimportant to me)

* 1 and a half years of paid parental leave for both parents.

* free education

* universal healthcare

* generally available social housing.

* council for faltering families as a way to prevent (unnecessary) divorces. Most marriages can and should be salvaged.

Seen in that light both conservatives (in Europe or the U.S) and liberals are anti-family values.
Last edited by Free Tristania on Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:57 am

Each family has its own set of values. It may or may not be similar to the sets of values of other families.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17203
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:57 am

Values of a valueless institution, to be abolished post-haste.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:59 am

Fun fact: as marriage equality has increased, the divorce rate has gone down. Now, it's these two things aren't linked. However, it certainly undermines their claims of "traditional marriage" being destroyed.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:02 am

Kelinfort wrote:Fun fact: as marriage equality has increased, the divorce rate has gone down. Now, it's these two things aren't linked. However, it certainly undermines their claims of "traditional marriage" being destroyed.

Part of the reason might also be that it's harder for ultra-conservative families to prevent their children from having relationships prior to marriage. Early marriages that lack premarital sex are notoriously prone to divorce.

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:04 am

Kelinfort wrote:Fun fact: as marriage equality has increased, the divorce rate has gone down. Now, it's these two things aren't linked. However, it certainly undermines their claims of "traditional marriage" being destroyed.

It's actually the other way around: in the U.S the divorce rate is hovering around the 50 percent. In the Netherlands it's currently 43 percent. What has gone down is the marriage rate. Probably because there is no actual marriage equality but affirmative action for women in family law: during divorce cases they get to take the children and to pluck the former husband. Never mind that well over 80 percent of all divorce cases are initiated by the woman - usually for trivial reasons.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:06 am

Free Tristania wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:Fun fact: as marriage equality has increased, the divorce rate has gone down. Now, it's these two things aren't linked. However, it certainly undermines their claims of "traditional marriage" being destroyed.

It's actually the other way around: in the U.S the divorce rate is hovering around the 50 percent. In the Netherlands it's currently 43 percent. What has gone down is the marriage rate. Probably because there is no actual marriage equality but affirmative action for women in family law: during divorce cases they get to take the children and to pluck the former husband. Never mind that well over 80 percent of all divorce cases are initiated by the woman - usually for trivial reasons.

:roll:

That's right, that bitch is selfish and angry. What a whore.

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:08 am

Kelinfort wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:It's actually the other way around: in the U.S the divorce rate is hovering around the 50 percent. In the Netherlands it's currently 43 percent. What has gone down is the marriage rate. Probably because there is no actual marriage equality but affirmative action for women in family law: during divorce cases they get to take the children and to pluck the former husband. Never mind that well over 80 percent of all divorce cases are initiated by the woman - usually for trivial reasons.

:roll:

That's right, that bitch is selfish and angry. What a whore.

Spend 10 minutes googling and find out more.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Syndicapolis
Envoy
 
Posts: 281
Founded: Jun 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Syndicapolis » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:11 am

Reactionary socially constructed crap used to justify discrimination. The family and its bullshit "values" must be abolished.

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:12 am

The key reason why divorce rates used to be lower was probably not that people considered marriage more "sacred" back then, but the social stigma associated with being divorced - especially for women. Plus, being married was many womens' only source of income.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:13 am

Free Tristania wrote:
Kelinfort wrote: :roll:

That's right, that bitch is selfish and angry. What a whore.

Spend 10 minutes googling and find out more.

Yeah...it says nothing about "trivial" reasons for divorce.

Also look at how powerful the bitch is with the children!

In the Netherlands, parents of minor children have a legal obligation to submit a parenting plan to the court with agreements about the children. The plan states:

how the parents will share responsibility for the care and upbringing of their children

how parents should inform and consult each other about important decisions such as the choice of school

how the expenses related to the child or children are to be shared, and the amount of maintenance that is to be paid for the children

the parents must also discuss the children's wishes: they can discuss the parenting plan together, or alternatively they can use the services of a lawyer or mediator.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Aserlandia, Celritannia, Cyptopir, Deblar, Eahland, El Lazaro, Hammer Britannia, Ifreann, Kaumudeen, Keltionialang, Kerwa, Maximum Imperium Rex, Plan Neonie, Rary, Soviet Haaregrad, The Archregimancy, The Two Jerseys, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads