GMOs - your opinion

[The All-Natural Future]

GMOs are an extremely controversial topic of discussion. Some claim that such genetic food is healthy and without harmful effects, that it will "feed the world". Others point out that they are a contamination of nature, that also has devastating effects on health.

My opinion: genetically modified frankenstein food is one of the three biggest threats to both earth and people. Gmos cause cancer ( http://www.gmoseralini.org/portfolio-it ... t-tumours/ ) allergies ( http://www.responsibletechnology.org/gm ... s-May-2007 ) mass suicides ( http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-gmo ... 0-minutes/ ) and kill babies in the womb ( http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-bt- ... ryo-cells/ ) along with causing obesity ( http://www.cornucopia.org/2012/07/obesity-corn-gmos/ ) and infertility ( http://www.responsibletechnology.org/ar ... -sterility ) along with causing extreme inflammation ( http://gmojudycarman.org/new-study-show ... y-gm-feed/ ) and they even cause autism ( http://mobile.dudamobile.com/site/healt ... =true#2676 ). All these health harms do not rven begin to take into account how they are used by megacorps as a financial tool of control. For a healthy humanity and a health planet we must ban gmos immediately.

It is my passionate belief that gmos must be eliminated, Now what are your opinions on this matter?

[Washington Resistance Army]

GMO's are great, everything should be genetically modified.

[Harpers Ferry]

They're great. Bout it really.

[Scomagia]

People who rail against GMOs are people who are ignorant of science. A drop of scientific literacy is all that's needed to see that GMOs aren't bad.

Also, OP sucks at satire. 1/10

[Dinake]

GMO's can save millions of people from starvation and there is little evidence of superweeds even being possible, or of them causing cancer. Opposing them is just irresponsible, especially as they're better for the environment to boot.

[Sun Wukong]

Indisputable proof that OP is mistaken:

[The All-Natural Future]

Indisputable proof that OP is mistaken:

(Image)

What in the fuck?!!?

[Wisconsin9]

They're pretty good.

[Harpers Ferry]

Indisputable proof that OP is mistaken:

(Image)

Sweet naked Romans on stillts.

[The All-Natural Future]

They're pretty good.

Why???

[The Confederacy of Nationalism]

GMO's are great, everything should be genetically modified.

agreed

[Seno Zhou Varada]

They're pretty good.

Why???

Cheaper, can give more vitamins if modified, not disease causing

[Washington Resistance Army]

Indisputable proof that OP is mistaken:

(Image)

This is pretty much /thread

You can't argue against that.

[Sun Wukong]

They're pretty good.

Why???

Because they do none of the things you say, and also massively increase the amount of available food in the world?

[Wisconsin9]

They're pretty good.

Why???

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2013/10/14/2000-reasons-why-gmos-are-safe-to-eat-and-environmentally-sustainable/2/

[Seno Zhou Varada]

GMOs are an extremely controversial topic of discussion. Some claim that such genetic food is healthy and without harmful effects, that it will "feed the world". Others point out that they are a contamination of nature, that also has devastating effects on health.

My opinion: genetically modified frankenstein food is one of the three biggest threats to both earth and people. Gmos cause cancer ( http://www.gmoseralini.org/portfolio-it ... t-tumours/ ) allergies ( http://www.responsibletechnology.org/gm ... s-May-2007 ) mass suicides ( http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-gmo ... 0-minutes/ ) and kill babies in the womb ( http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-bt- ... ryo-cells/ ) along with causing obesity ( http://www.cornucopia.org/2012/07/obesity-corn-gmos/ ) and infertility ( http://www.responsibletechnology.org/ar ... -sterility ) along with causing extreme inflammation ( http://gmojudycarman.org/new-study-show ... y-gm-feed/ ) and they even cause autism ( http://mobile.dudamobile.com/site/healt ... =true#2676 ). All these health harms do not rven begin to take into account how they are used by megacorps as a financial tool of control. For a healthy humanity and a health planet we must ban gmos immediately.

It is my passionate belief that gmos must be eliminated, Now what are your opinions on this matter?

Credible sources needed.

[Scomagia]

They're pretty good.

Why???

Higher potential yield and higher resilience to drought and unfavorable conditions, for starters.

[Ripoll]

GMOs are literally healthier than natural foods. They take away side effects, have better texture and are more durable. The issue isn't controversial at all

[The Confederacy of Nationalism]

Indisputable proof that OP is mistaken:

(Image)

This is pretty much /thread

You can't argue against that.

I can argue against it with landwhale

[Vazdaria]

GMOs are an extremely controversial topic of discussion. Some claim that such genetic food is healthy and without harmful effects, that it will "feed the world". Others point out that they are a contamination of nature, that also has devastating effects on health.

My opinion: genetically modified frankenstein food is one of the three biggest threats to both earth and people. Gmos cause cancer ( http://www.gmoseralini.org/portfolio-it ... t-tumours/ ) allergies ( http://www.responsibletechnology.org/gm ... s-May-2007 ) mass suicides ( http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-gmo ... 0-minutes/ ) and kill babies in the womb ( http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-bt- ... ryo-cells/ ) along with causing obesity ( http://www.cornucopia.org/2012/07/obesity-corn-gmos/ ) and infertility ( http://www.responsibletechnology.org/ar ... -sterility ) along with causing extreme inflammation ( http://gmojudycarman.org/new-study-show ... y-gm-feed/ ) and they even cause autism ( http://mobile.dudamobile.com/site/healt ... =true#2676 ). All these health harms do not rven begin to take into account how they are used by megacorps as a financial tool of control. For a healthy humanity and a health planet we must ban gmos immediately.

It is my passionate belief that gmos must be eliminated, Now what are your opinions on this matter?

I'm not a fan.

While artificial selection and breeding are okay, I'm not a fan of DNA re-sequencing.

[The All-Natural Future]

Why???

1 Cheaper, 2 can give more vitamins if modified, 3 not disease causing

1 not relevant. Nature is not worth sacrificing over price
2 so what? We should use what nature gave us. We must accept our place in the world, not try to engineer the world through unfeeling, impersonal science to meet our ridiculous expectations.
3 I already provided sources proof of disease.

[The All-Natural Future]

Why???

Higher potential yield and higher resilience to drought and unfavorable conditions, for starters.

Then why did 200 thousand indian farmers commit suicide from a drought caused by gmos?

[District XIV]

3 I already provided sources proof of disease.

But are they credible sources?

Ah... nope.

[Harpers Ferry]

1 Cheaper, 2 can give more vitamins if modified, 3 not disease causing

1 not relevant. Nature is not worth sacrificing over price
2 so what? We should use what nature gave us. We must accept our place in the world, not try to engineer the world through unfeeling, impersonal science to meet our ridiculous expectations.
3 I already provided sources proof of disease.

Yes, it is. Within reason. And just because it's natural doesn't mean it's good. Nicotene, opium, and a pack of wolves are also natural.

[Wisconsin9]

1 Cheaper, 2 can give more vitamins if modified, 3 not disease causing

1 not relevant. Nature is not worth sacrificing over price
2 so what? We should use what nature gave us. We must accept our place in the world, not try to engineer the world through unfeeling, impersonal science to meet our ridiculous expectations.
3 I already provided sources proof of disease.

I'd rather have non-natural crap than die of starvation, and why exactly should we pander to nature?