NATION

PASSWORD

Netflix CEO: TV broadcasting goes bye bye

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Dalcaria
Minister
 
Posts: 2718
Founded: Jun 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Dalcaria » Thu Nov 27, 2014 11:04 pm

Netflix may be able to replace TV in 30 years or so, but only because a vast majority of users have easier usability of it than TV itself. That said, thousands of people who can't have decent internet access or going to be left in the cold, which will tick off a lot of people I think. The only reason I see something like this happening is because most of the global population lives in compact, urbanized areas with access to relatively decent internet. Once everyone starts switching to that, TV won't be able to financially support itself from the loses. So either two things need to happen to meet the needs of the people left in the dark. Either we need to VASTLY improve on the access to good internet for everyone in our separate countries (as well as lowering the often times insane costs), or we need to find a way of making television more valuable to keep around.

Netflix would be an amazing way to get thousands upon thousands of movies collected for quick, easy, and cheap access, but for things like TV shows, cartoons, News, etc, I think TV could still have some value left. Obviously Netflix has shown it's value in allowing us access to shows and movies, but do you know how difficult it is to find some movies on Netflix, even the American one? On that note, I've tried both the Canadian and American Netflix services, and both are missing a lot of movies, movies that are even difficult to find on the internet. That said, I think they should dedicate more time to giving us access to the thousands of easy and hard to find movies we may want to watch, and leave scheduled TV shows and such to TV companies. That said, if we lose movies from TV companies, they better be prepared to lower the price of their service too.

It's all an idea to try and keep both methods of entertainment alive and healthy, but we'll see what happens by 2030. Also, seriously, movie theaters need to lower their absolutely terrible prices by a lot. Fine, charge me $15 for a movie, but at least give me the popcorn, drink and candy for less! Going to a movie shouldn't have to cost me more than $20 bucks altogether, and I doubt you'll be losing much money off of it. At least people will have more motivation to see your movie in theaters and spend money on it rather than just watching it online for free!
"Take Fascism and remove the racism, ultra-nationalism, oppression, murder, and replace these things with proper civil rights and freedoms and what do you get? Us, a much stronger and more free nation than most."
"Tell me, is it still a 'revolution' or 'liberation' when you are killing our men, women, and children in front of us for not allowing themselves to be 'saved' by you? Call Communism and Democracy whatever you want, but to our people they're both the same thing; Oppression."
"You say manifest destiny, I say act of war. You're free to disagree with me, but I tend to make my arguments with a gun."
Since everyone does one of these: Impeach Democracy, Legalize Monarchy, Incompetent leadership is theft.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Fri Nov 28, 2014 12:27 am

I suspect the factor that will most shape the future of TV is whether targeted advertising to individuals is more effective than broadcasting the same advert to everyone. If it is then satellite TV will lose out to cable.

Beyond that it kind of makes sense to use all the different methods of transmitting information just for the internet, with TV channels just merging in with everything else, so there will be TV on demand as well as TV stations with schedules.

Though if BT and other ISPs in the UK don't get their act together it is going to be a future of poor quality service.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Fri Nov 28, 2014 2:44 am

Dalcaria wrote:Netflix may be able to replace TV in 30 years or so, but only because a vast majority of users have easier usability of it than TV itself. That said, thousands of people who can't have decent internet access or going to be left in the cold, which will tick off a lot of people I think. The only reason I see something like this happening is because most of the global population lives in compact, urbanized areas with access to relatively decent internet. Once everyone starts switching to that, TV won't be able to financially support itself from the loses. So either two things need to happen to meet the needs of the people left in the dark. Either we need to VASTLY improve on the access to good internet for everyone in our separate countries (as well as lowering the often times insane costs), or we need to find a way of making television more valuable to keep around.

Netflix would be an amazing way to get thousands upon thousands of movies collected for quick, easy, and cheap access, but for things like TV shows, cartoons, News, etc, I think TV could still have some value left. Obviously Netflix has shown it's value in allowing us access to shows and movies, but do you know how difficult it is to find some movies on Netflix, even the American one? On that note, I've tried both the Canadian and American Netflix services, and both are missing a lot of movies, movies that are even difficult to find on the internet. That said, I think they should dedicate more time to giving us access to the thousands of easy and hard to find movies we may want to watch, and leave scheduled TV shows and such to TV companies. That said, if we lose movies from TV companies, they better be prepared to lower the price of their service too.

It's all an idea to try and keep both methods of entertainment alive and healthy, but we'll see what happens by 2030. Also, seriously, movie theaters need to lower their absolutely terrible prices by a lot. Fine, charge me $15 for a movie, but at least give me the popcorn, drink and candy for less! Going to a movie shouldn't have to cost me more than $20 bucks altogether, and I doubt you'll be losing much money off of it. At least people will have more motivation to see your movie in theaters and spend money on it rather than just watching it online for free!


You don't seriously buy your food at the theatre? Just bring a bag and buy food from a cheaper store and put it in your bag. Also make sure bag isn't transparent :lol:

As for the OP issue I doubt it will replace TV, but I do worry what will happen to the BBC if less people buy a TV licence. How will I watch British bake off, downton abbey and doctor who? :eek:
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:12 am

It makes me smile that someone with a nation called Dooom35796821595 enjoys Downton Abbey.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Republic of Coldwater
Senator
 
Posts: 4500
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Coldwater » Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:47 am

This is very premature. In many places, internet coverage is very poor, and some rural places can only get 7 Megabits per Second (less than 1 megabyte per second), which means that they can probably get at best 640p, and that isn't very practical as the videos would look like shit if it was projected on a 1080P TV or something of that sort.

When 15-20mbps internet becomes almost universal like how TV is almost universal, yes, Netflix and other internet broadcasting companies will take over, alongside current companies who will also naturally change to internet broadcasting because of market demands.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:15 am

Alistan wrote:I don't know about you NSGers, but I noticed a trend where people stopped watching TV, and instead, use the internet to stream movies for free.

Meh. As for myself, my main use of the TV isn't for entertainment, it's for information. I guess that broadcast of information is going to stay.
.

User avatar
Faiv
Attaché
 
Posts: 67
Founded: Nov 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Faiv » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:23 am

TV is not going anywhere.

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30591
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:23 am

Of course Netflix's CEO would think so - he has no contact with the medium anymore. Why would he need to? Trouble is, for many it's still a highly convenient mode of entertainment and information. The TV will go, but it's not going anytime soon.
Platitude with attitude
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5385
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Fri Nov 28, 2014 4:57 am

It is the way of technology, I mean I doubt Broadcast TV will be completly eradicated but will be pushed aside greatly similar to how the TV sidelined the Radio. Ether way I can say I'm gung-ho about this but as it is simply a natural progression in technology im not going to say it bad or frivolously argue the meeits of broadcast TV as streaming in my opinion is simply better.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:04 am

Completely ignoring the fact that most people in 2nd and 3rd world countries (sometimes even 1st world) don't have the economic capabilities to buy the latest Beefcake of a computer with those cards and CPU's and RAM to even handle any HD streaming, not to mention the excruciating throttling of internet speeds that make you feel like a fish in a bowl, hoping that you'll maybe get some food that day.
So no, TV isn't going anywhere.
???

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri Nov 28, 2014 6:29 am

We thinks he doth drink too much wine.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri Nov 28, 2014 6:36 am

Insaeldor wrote:It is the way of technology, I mean I doubt Broadcast TV will be completly eradicated but will be pushed aside greatly similar to how the TV sidelined the Radio. Ether way I can say I'm gung-ho about this but as it is simply a natural progression in technology im not going to say it bad or frivolously argue the meeits of broadcast TV as streaming in my opinion is simply better.


The Radio and TV are two different products. TV and Netflix aren't, they are different methods of delivering a similar and in many cases identical product. Secondly radio is not sidelined. Most people still listen to the Radio and in the UK for example record numbers are listening to the radio each week.
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Fri Nov 28, 2014 6:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:35 am

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:I don't support these changes. Let's keep things as they are.

My only complaint about television these days would have to be how perverted most of the TV shows are. Even on Netflix, which my relatives love to watch.

How the fuck aren't you banned yet?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:41 am

CTALNH wrote:
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:I don't support these changes. Let's keep things as they are.

My only complaint about television these days would have to be how perverted most of the TV shows are. Even on Netflix, which my relatives love to watch.

How the fuck aren't you banned yet?


Because on NSG, every single opinion is valid and needs to be argued down.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:42 am

Gauthier wrote:
CTALNH wrote:How the fuck aren't you banned yet?


Because on NSG, every single opinion is valid and needs to be argued down.


Well not quite every opinion.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:03 am

Gauthier wrote:
CTALNH wrote:How the fuck aren't you banned yet?


Because on NSG, every single opinion is valid and needs to be argued down.


There is also the option of ignoring them. One I prefer.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:37 am

Gauthier wrote:
CTALNH wrote:How the fuck aren't you banned yet?


Because on NSG, every single opinion is valid and needs to be argued down.

No not really.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10825
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Sat Nov 29, 2014 6:19 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:God I hope Netflix ends up buying all of the local stations were I live.


Netflix is no match for the Power of HULU! :clap: :lol:

Even the Hulu commercials are jumping!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC1QmW2Y7jo
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sat Nov 29, 2014 6:28 pm

The main problem that I see is that a full cable TV package is expensive, if there was an a la carte option to pay for only the channels you want, I think broadcast TV might be able to compete. The edge broadcast TV currently has are the sports channels.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Fireye
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fireye » Sat Nov 29, 2014 6:35 pm

The only thing I watch on TV is live sporting events (even if I'm pissed at the Bears now.)
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/235745/

Proud Member of the National Canine Association. We Defend Dogs and Dog Owners Alike

User avatar
Belmaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Jun 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Belmaria » Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:37 pm

I only watch TV when I want to watch a show that isn't on Netflix. Otherwise, I watch Netflix.
-3.5 Economically, -6.2 Socially

Click to Learn Why Trump is a Fascist


Proud Member of the Progressive Movement

User avatar
Soviet Haaregrad
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16703
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Soviet Haaregrad » Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:43 pm

I haven't really watched TV since the early 2000s, I think the Netflix CEO is on to something. That said, he may be overestimating how many people want any sort of video service. Why passively watch content when the internet is full of interactive content one can actively contribute to?
RP Population: 1760//76 million//1920 104 million//1960 209 million//1992 238 million
81% Economic Leftist, 56% Anarchist, 79% Anti-Militarist, 89% Socio-Cultural Liberal, 73% Civil Libertarian
Privatization of collectively owned property is theft.
The Confederacy of Independent Socialist Republics
FACTBOOK
ART


There are no gods and no one is a prophet.

User avatar
Text People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Text People » Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:56 pm

Jordsindia wrote:I watch TV all the time. due to the fact that we lack a Netflix subscription/ internet TV.

I ws beginning to wonder if I was the only person that didn't have Netflix or internet TV.

User avatar
Soviet Haaregrad
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16703
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Soviet Haaregrad » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:22 pm

Text People wrote:
Jordsindia wrote:I watch TV all the time. due to the fact that we lack a Netflix subscription/ internet TV.

I ws beginning to wonder if I was the only person that didn't have Netflix or internet TV.


I have neither internet TV nor old school TV. :meh:
RP Population: 1760//76 million//1920 104 million//1960 209 million//1992 238 million
81% Economic Leftist, 56% Anarchist, 79% Anti-Militarist, 89% Socio-Cultural Liberal, 73% Civil Libertarian
Privatization of collectively owned property is theft.
The Confederacy of Independent Socialist Republics
FACTBOOK
ART


There are no gods and no one is a prophet.

User avatar
Skeckoa
Minister
 
Posts: 2127
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Skeckoa » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:25 pm

Until Mexican Telenovelas appear on Netflix, I have to at least support one cable box. Other than that, fuck broadcast Television.
One of those PC liberals with anti-colonist sympathies
——————————
————————————
————————————
CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC
————————————

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Big Eyed Animation, Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Keltionialang, Likhinia, Shrillland, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads