Advertisement
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:00 pm
Imperium Nova wrote:Pedophile literally means a child-lover, but I assume that one would not call a mother a pedophile simply because she loves her child. I'd assume what you are hinting at is that pedophiles do not have to necessarily molest children, or?
by Imperium Nova » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:05 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Imperium Nova wrote:Pedophile literally means a child-lover, but I assume that one would not call a mother a pedophile simply because she loves her child. I'd assume what you are hinting at is that pedophiles do not have to necessarily molest children, or?
Yes, he means people sick on the head, but not predatory.
by Farnhamia » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:09 pm
Imperium Nova wrote:Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Yes, he means people sick on the head, but not predatory.
Oh, so perhaps just watching photos and videos of child pornography, which creates a demand for child pornography and child molesting in turn. So... I would not suggest for anyone to come to the defense of the non-child molesting pedophiles.
by Liriena » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:10 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Imperium Nova wrote:Pedophile literally means a child-lover, but I assume that one would not call a mother a pedophile simply because she loves her child. I'd assume what you are hinting at is that pedophiles do not have to necessarily molest children, or?
Yes, he means people sick on the head, but not predatory.
by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:11 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The topic is the relationship of furry sex to the UK's Extreme Pornography Act.
by Liriena » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:12 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Imperium Nova wrote:Oh, so perhaps just watching photos and videos of child pornography, which creates a demand for child pornography and child molesting in turn. So... I would not suggest for anyone to come to the defense of the non-child molesting pedophiles.
Perhaps not, but neither child pornography, pedophiles not child-molesters are not the topic of this thread. The topic is the relationship of furry sex to the UK's Extreme Pornography Act. Back on topic, please.
by Farnhamia » Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:55 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:37 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by L Ron Cupboard » Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:38 am
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:45 am
L Ron Cupboard wrote:I pity people with a Frosties fetish.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Shilya » Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:10 am
by Herskerstad » Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:26 am
by Firsthome » Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:33 am
Herskerstad wrote:Wait, we can now legislate against furries.....? Where is that halleluja theme
Please tell me we can extend this to bronies.
by Ozzy » Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:34 am
by Ozzy » Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:43 am
Firsthome wrote:Bronies are a type of furry I dislike, put only when they don't shut up about mlp
by Ozzy » Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:04 am
L Ron Cupboard wrote:I pity people with a Frosties fetish.
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:06 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cyptopir, Diarcesia, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Neo-Hermitius, Niolia, Ors Might, Plan Neonie, Tungstan, Uiiop
