Vladislavija wrote:What what? Are you saying companies should hire more blacks instead of companies should hire more best qualified people?
Who are you talking to?
Advertisement
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 24, 2014 4:32 am
Vladislavija wrote:What what? Are you saying companies should hire more blacks instead of companies should hire more best qualified people?
by Murkwood » Fri Oct 24, 2014 4:35 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 24, 2014 4:40 am
Murkwood wrote:Companies aren't allowed to discriminate, but people sure can. Why not?
by Murkwood » Fri Oct 24, 2014 4:43 am
Arumdaum wrote:Murkwood wrote:Companies aren't allowed to discriminate, but people sure can. Why not?
Requesting "white-only" services would indirectly lead to companies disproportionally hiring people due to their race, and discourage hiring non-white people.
Furthermore, this would mean that non-white people would be less likely to receive a tip than they already are, as they would be providing services for less people.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Vladislavija » Fri Oct 24, 2014 4:59 am
by Firsthome » Fri Oct 24, 2014 5:13 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Romic wrote:I work in a convience store and I have hispanic customers request someone that speaks spanish. I however do know enough spanish to help the customer they protest. (Since I am the only person here at night) I tell them no one else is here. They generally leave and don't come back. Things like this happen all the time here and in surrounding areas to the point they request only hispanic workers. So it is not an isolated issue of one race. It's all over.
I find that as bad as people requesting to speak to an American, honestly, and I'm Latino myself.
Who gives a crap about THAT? If you can help me and I could only speak Spanish I would take your help because I want something. People like that piss me the fuck off.
Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
by Ifreann » Fri Oct 24, 2014 5:26 am
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Umm for all I care it's 2 private entities that should be free to agree to whatever transaction in their own terms
Firsthome wrote:Free Europa wrote:It is a very sad day for Europe when you have to request a normal driver. Worse, they are all Pakistanis so they are probably all muslim and support sharia law! Meanwhile so many honest christian Brits are unemployed, struggling to feed their family
All this genocide of european culture called immigration has to stop!
Didn't you read the sign when you joined? It read " racists not allowed here"
by Firsthome » Fri Oct 24, 2014 5:28 am
Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
by Luziyca » Fri Oct 24, 2014 5:37 am
The State of Deseret wrote:Let the person request. Let the Company respond.
If the Company says yay then good on you. If they say Nay no harm done.
by Freiheit Reich » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:03 am
by Firsthome » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:07 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:The policy should be up to the company.
However, what about not requesting a taxi driver in the UK (or anywhere in Europe or the USA for that matter). Taxis are shockingly expensive. Take a bus/train, ride a bike, or walk. Some people in the UK must be seriously loaded with cash.
Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
by Winston Spencer-Churchill » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:11 am
Ifreann wrote:Maybe he means the 14th Amendment to the UK Constitution.
by Aurea » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:12 am
by Bandwagon » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:13 am
by Freiheit Reich » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:16 am
Firsthome wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:The policy should be up to the company.
However, what about not requesting a taxi driver in the UK (or anywhere in Europe or the USA for that matter). Taxis are shockingly expensive. Take a bus/train, ride a bike, or walk. Some people in the UK must be seriously loaded with cash.
Trains are the most expensive, actually. It would cost more to take a train across the us than to fly across
by Freiheit Reich » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:22 am
Bandwagon wrote:Why doesn't the company put up a sign that reads:
" No Racists, Sexists or Homophobes"
It will sort it out.
by Firsthome » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:30 am
Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
by Old Tyrannia » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:33 am
by Ifreann » Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:53 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:The policy should be up to the company.
Freiheit Reich wrote:Bandwagon wrote:Why doesn't the company put up a sign that reads:
" No Racists, Sexists or Homophobes"
It will sort it out.
If the Pakistanis as a majority belonged to a religion that didn't hate other religions perhaps more people would like them driving their cab. I will judge based on religion not race and I am probably not alone.
If you belong to a religion that hates me and wants to force me to convert to your views, I will feel uncomfortable taking your cab.
Stop using the race card, it doesn't apply as much as you probably think it does.
Sexism is sometimes justified. You would feel better if your young daughter was driven by a female taxi driver than a male driver, right? There are probably some people that would (although female can drivers are probably not common).
by Alyakia » Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:55 am
by WestRedMaple » Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:04 am
Ifreann wrote:DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Umm for all I care it's 2 private entities that should be free to agree to whatever transaction in their own terms
No they shouldn't. The UK is a nation of laws, private entities can't just do whatever they want.Firsthome wrote:
Didn't you read the sign when you joined? It read " racists not allowed here"
Fuck, I wish.Fartsniffage wrote:
The UK doesn't follow the US constitution.
Maybe he means the 14th Amendment to the UK Constitution.
by Fartsniffage » Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:08 am
WestRedMaple wrote:Ifreann wrote:No they shouldn't. The UK is a nation of laws, private entities can't just do whatever they want.
Fuck, I wish.
Maybe he means the 14th Amendment to the UK Constitution.
Yes, they should. The UK is a nation of laws, and there is no good reason to have any preventing people from exercising their right to choose their own private transactions
by Land of wisdom » Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:12 am
by Svatantra Mulukama » Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:30 am
Land of wisdom wrote:Normally I say that all races are equal but if they feel in danger because of problems with a group of drivers of a certain race its fine until they can be absolutely sure their driver will not do things like that
Centre-Left Social Democrat, Bisexual, Agnostic Buddhist
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Cerula, Cop Met, Cyptopir, Elejamie, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ineva, Lans Isles, Murias, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Valrifall, Zancostan
Advertisement