NATION

PASSWORD

Should Women Have to Sign Up For Selective Service Too?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:26 pm

West Pacific wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:Which means that, in all probability, if your paperwork lists you as male and you did so before turning 26, someone who was supposed to check your SSS status didn't do so, probably 2-3 times. (Sometimes, the right / wrong institutions list you as female due to clerical errors somewhere along the line.) You may have lied on your paperwork.

At a minimum, this is true of your financial aid. It may also be true of your government job and driver's license, depending on the type of job and the state you got your license in.


False.

https://fafsa.ed.gov/fotw1314/help/fahelp42.htm
http://www.finaid.org/students/selectiveservice.phtml
https://www.sss.gov/FSbenefits.htm

...

User avatar
West Pacific
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Dec 23, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby West Pacific » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:28 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:It'd probably be quite illegal to bar you from voting if you fail to register for Selective Service. This does not mean that failure to register is without its implications.


Technically it is not a crime to not register for the Selective Service. It is however a crime to choose not to register. The only way to punish a person for not registering is to prove that the person made the conscious decision not to register, which means the person has to implicate themself in some way.
Last edited by West Pacific on Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Oceasia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5709
Founded: Dec 21, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Oceasia » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:29 pm

It's sexist to women because they're being treated as weak cowards who has to be rescued by a handsome knight riding a white horse.
It's sexist to men because they have to defend their country by fighting, while women doesn't have to do that.

So, by being sexist to both sides, the selective service is actually being fair to both sides by doing so.

Mind=Blown
..()_()
.(o - o) /\
...|.....\/...\
...|......\vvv\
...|.)|.)(..)===<<<
Economic Left/Right= -3.0
Social Liberal/Authoritarian= -4.41
You are 2.8% Evil.
You are 17.9% Lawful.
Alignment: True Neutral
Jurassic World has announced a new attraction coming this June. No other details were given.

No, my nation isn't ruled by dinosaurs

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:29 pm

Yes. They want equality so that would mean having to do things that us men must do.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
West Pacific
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Dec 23, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby West Pacific » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:30 pm



And yet I didn't register and I received financial aid. Would you like to guess how this happened or should I spoil the surprise and just tell you? I hinted at it already.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:31 pm

West Pacific wrote:Technically it is not a crime to not register for the Selective Service. It is however a crime to choose not to register. The only way to punish a person for not registering is to prove that the person made the conscious decision not to register, which means the person has to implicate themself in some way.


Yea, I've heard of this before.

As a (fakie, long story) Permanent Resident I wasn't sure whether I was required or not to register, so I registered with my Alien # when I was close to my 18th birthday just in case.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:35 pm

West Pacific wrote:


And yet I didn't register and I received financial aid. Would you like to guess how this happened or should I spoil the surprise and just tell you? I hinted at it already.

I don't care to guess how it happened. I already told you that either you weren't a male under the age of 26, lied, or someone screwed up. (There is, of course, the other option of "I'm not an American and was referring to something entirely different facetiously in a thread referring specifically to the US Selective Service System.")

The important thing - which is to say young men actually do get screwed over in some ways by not registering - is entirely true.

User avatar
West Pacific
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Dec 23, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby West Pacific » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:40 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
West Pacific wrote:
And yet I didn't register and I received financial aid. Would you like to guess how this happened or should I spoil the surprise and just tell you? I hinted at it already.

I don't care to guess how it happened. I already told you that either you weren't a male under the age of 26, lied, or someone screwed up. (There is, of course, the other option of "I'm not an American and was referring to something entirely different facetiously in a thread referring specifically to the US Selective Service System.")

The important thing - which is to say young men actually do get screwed over in some ways by not registering - is entirely true.


Ok, if you're going to be like that. I was on active duty within 30 days of turning 18 and I've been in the military ever since. I answered truthfully when asked if I registered and said no and checked the "active military" box on paperwork. Thus I've managed to stay off the grid.

User avatar
Lavan Tiri
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9061
Founded: Feb 18, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Lavan Tiri » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:43 pm

Blazedtown wrote:Absolutely they should.

Damn straight.

User avatar
Cata Larga
Diplomat
 
Posts: 985
Founded: Dec 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Cata Larga » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:25 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:It'd probably be quite illegal to bar you from voting if you fail to register for Selective Service. This does not mean that failure to register is without its implications.

Registration for Selective Service is required to:
  • Obtain federal student aid
  • Be employed by the federal government
  • Obtain federal benefits, including healthcare
  • Be eligible for citizenship (if an immigrant)
  • Technically, not be thrown in prison, but criminal laws against non-registrants haven't been enforced since the 80s
In addition, in some states and territories, registration is required to:
  • Obtain a driver's license or ID card
  • Obtain state higher education benefits
  • Be employed by the state/territorial government
  • Receive state benefits, including healthcare
  • In Alaska's case, receive Alaska Permanent Fund dividends
Hopefully this could clear up some misunderstandings about the repercussions for failing to register with Selective Service.
Last edited by Cata Larga on Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Confederated Free Cities and Departments of the Catalarguense Commonwealth
“Invikta" - "Unconquered"
Capital: Puerte-de-Liberete | Largest City: Kapa-Trinieta | Population: 97,370,679
Quotes
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:>jesus: the secret muslim
Constaniana wrote:No, you see, when a football player is good enough, they start getting funny, but natural, urges. Urges that tell them to mark their dominance over other players by sinking their teeth into their flesh.
Storefronts
None worth mentioning

Alliances
None

Current Foreign Involvements
None

Miscellany
The Litorean Catholic Church recognizes the authority of the Roman Curia

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:01 pm

Of course women should. It's a simple matter of equality, and many feminists have already started arguing for it. Military service has been argued to be a way of giving back to the nation, and not registering women stems from the misogynistic tradition that women give back to the nation by having children while their masculine husbands do the 'rough work' in the military. It's an abhorrent remnant of patriarchy.
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:42 pm

well, no selective service should exist at all.

but if we had to keep it for some reason, both genders should be required to join.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Pagan Hungary
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 477
Founded: Mar 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pagan Hungary » Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:57 pm

I'd personally prefer for them not to.
I am supportive of feudal and fascist based governments.
Pro: Fascism, Military interventionism, Ukrainian rebels, NATO, Gun rights, Free Speech, Religious Freedom, non-ethnocentric Nationalism.
Anti: Nazism, neo-Nazism, Racism, Communism, Socialism, EU, Gun-control, Corruption.
Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:22 am

Pagan Hungary wrote:I'd personally prefer for them not to.


Why? What's wrong with women wanting to serve in the military?
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Pagan Hungary
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 477
Founded: Mar 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pagan Hungary » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:32 am

Divitaen wrote:
Pagan Hungary wrote:I'd personally prefer for them not to.


Why? What's wrong with women wanting to serve in the military?


I just don't see the benefit of having both sexes go to war for their country. It's just the ideals I believe in, I'm sure people are going to just scream "muh patriarchy" or whatever nonsense about it.
Last edited by Pagan Hungary on Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
I am supportive of feudal and fascist based governments.
Pro: Fascism, Military interventionism, Ukrainian rebels, NATO, Gun rights, Free Speech, Religious Freedom, non-ethnocentric Nationalism.
Anti: Nazism, neo-Nazism, Racism, Communism, Socialism, EU, Gun-control, Corruption.
Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:35 am

I though America has abolished the military service! Does this mean my American friends here in the UK are draft-evaders? :(

User avatar
Luziyca
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38280
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Luziyca » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:36 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:No, how about getting rid of the Selective service system instead.

Amen.
|||The Kingdom of Rwizikuru|||
Your feeble attempts to change the very nature of how time itself has been organized by mankind shall fall on barren ground and bear no fruit
WikiFacebookKylaris: the best region for eight years runningAbout meYouTubePolitical compass

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:39 am

Pagan Hungary wrote:
Divitaen wrote:
Why? What's wrong with women wanting to serve in the military?


I just don't see the benefit of having both sexes go to war for their country. It's just the ideals I believe in, I'm sure people are going to just scream "muh patriarchy" or whatever nonsense about it.


It's not about some practical benefit, it's a simple matter of equality. I can't quite rationalise in my mind what is so uncomfortable about a woman signing up for the military because she wants to serve her country. You have people like Congresswoman Duckworth who are extremely patriotic veterans. It seems a bit strange to delineate gender roles even in the case of something like military service.
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Wikipedia and Universe
Senator
 
Posts: 3897
Founded: Jul 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikipedia and Universe » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:43 am

Either include women in Selective Service, or abolish Selective Service.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get pissed, they'll be a mile away- and barefoot.
Proud Member and Co-Founder of the MDISC Alliance
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203851
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:47 am

Ideally, no one, regardless of sex/gender, should be required to sign up for selective service if they don't wish to.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Rhydosar
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhydosar » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:51 am

Just abolish it.

User avatar
Pagan Hungary
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 477
Founded: Mar 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pagan Hungary » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:55 am

Divitaen wrote:
It's not about some practical benefit, it's a simple matter of equality. I can't quite rationalise in my mind what is so uncomfortable about a woman signing up for the military because she wants to serve her country. You have people like Congresswoman Duckworth who are extremely patriotic veterans. It seems a bit strange to delineate gender roles even in the case of something like military service.

I respect that many want to serve their country I just don't enjoy the idea of them being harmed in combat roles; that's sexist I guess but I'm not planning to stop women from serving country if it's their desire. Physical capabilities come into the equation but it's not the only reasoning for my personal beliefs.
I am supportive of feudal and fascist based governments.
Pro: Fascism, Military interventionism, Ukrainian rebels, NATO, Gun rights, Free Speech, Religious Freedom, non-ethnocentric Nationalism.
Anti: Nazism, neo-Nazism, Racism, Communism, Socialism, EU, Gun-control, Corruption.
Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Sun Oct 19, 2014 12:56 am

Pagan Hungary wrote:
Divitaen wrote:
It's not about some practical benefit, it's a simple matter of equality. I can't quite rationalise in my mind what is so uncomfortable about a woman signing up for the military because she wants to serve her country. You have people like Congresswoman Duckworth who are extremely patriotic veterans. It seems a bit strange to delineate gender roles even in the case of something like military service.

I respect that many want to serve their country I just don't enjoy the idea of them being harmed in combat roles; that's sexist I guess but I'm not planning to stop women from serving country if it's their desire. Physical capabilities come into the equation but it's not the only reasoning for my personal beliefs.


I guess I can sort of understand. I fundamentally disagree of course, but I have friends who have expressed similar beliefs. I guess I just don't like the idea of pre-judging people on the basis of gender.
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:04 am

Pagan Hungary wrote:
Divitaen wrote:
It's not about some practical benefit, it's a simple matter of equality. I can't quite rationalise in my mind what is so uncomfortable about a woman signing up for the military because she wants to serve her country. You have people like Congresswoman Duckworth who are extremely patriotic veterans. It seems a bit strange to delineate gender roles even in the case of something like military service.

I respect that many want to serve their country I just don't enjoy the idea of them being harmed in combat roles; that's sexist I guess but I'm not planning to stop women from serving country if it's their desire. Physical capabilities come into the equation but it's not the only reasoning for my personal beliefs.

Do women suffer from such physical limitations that they can't be soldiers? I really don't see how. If you personally hate the idea of women being hurt than that's fine, but it's not really fair to allow this to affect other people.

User avatar
Faith Hope Charity
Minister
 
Posts: 2027
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Faith Hope Charity » Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:29 am

No one should, SS = potential conscription/draft = state slavery.

It is sexist to demand men do it and not women do it, on top of the slavery aspect.
Je Suis Geller
Economic Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian: -6.77

People who denounce the free market and voluntary exchange, and are for control and coercion, believe they have more intelligence and superior wisdom to the masses. What's more, they believe they've been ordained to forcibly impose that wisdom on the rest of us. Of course, they have what they consider good reasons for doing so, but every tyrant that has ever existed has had what he believed were good reasons for restricting the liberty of others.
-Walter E. Williams

http://www.isidewith.com/results/426705837

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Atrito, Emotional Support Crocodile, Jerzylvania, La Paz de Los Ricos, Merien, Paddy O Fernature, Philjia, Plan Neonie, The Black Forrest, The Notorious Mad Jack, Tomie, Trollgaard, Tungstan, Turenia, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads