NATION

PASSWORD

The ethics of space colonies

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

The ethics of space colonies

Postby The Sotoan Union » Mon Sep 29, 2014 5:56 am

This may be somewhat difficult to talk about considering it is hypothetical, but lets say history happens just like we predict it to. Let's say in the distant future humanity colonizes other moons and planets. Whether they be in this solar system or another is irrelevant. Let's say that in decades, to hundreds of years, the colonies have developed industry and infrastructure. They are self-sufficient to the point of not completely relaying on other colonies. They develop their own culture and identity. Just like on Earth, now these colonies want independence.

Should we give it to them? In modern society colonies are considered unethical, but that largely comes from European colonization of other peoples. No one saw anything wrong with the European colonies that were founded by Europeans (like the US or Brazil.) Furthermore what if these colonies are necessary? What if their resources are necessary to maintain civilization on Earth? What if Earth is so uninhabitable that humanity on it would dies without the colonies. Is there some philosophical need to keep humanity united as it spreads through the stars?

Personally I think these colonies would win independence eventually, just like in the real world. So they should be given independence when they want it.

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:35 am

Really depends on the circumstances, the reasons for the Colonists' desire for Independence and on wether there were serious negotiations to maintain the unionist Status quo.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
ESTU
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 153
Founded: Sep 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby ESTU » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:37 am

The Sotoan Union wrote:This may be somewhat difficult to talk about considering it is hypothetical, but lets say history happens just like we predict it to. Let's say in the distant future humanity colonizes other moons and planets. Whether they be in this solar system or another is irrelevant. Let's say that in decades, to hundreds of years, the colonies have developed industry and infrastructure. They are self-sufficient to the point of not completely relaying on other colonies. They develop their own culture and identity. Just like on Earth, now these colonies want independence.

Should we give it to them? In modern society colonies are considered unethical, but that largely comes from European colonization of other peoples. No one saw anything wrong with the European colonies that were founded by Europeans (like the US or Brazil.) Furthermore what if these colonies are necessary? What if their resources are necessary to maintain civilization on Earth? What if Earth is so uninhabitable that humanity on it would dies without the colonies. Is there some philosophical need to keep humanity united as it spreads through the stars?

Personally I think these colonies would win independence eventually, just like in the real world. So they should be given independence when they want it.


They should be given independence from day one. The last thing the colonists need while breaking ground in a brand new and likely hostile world, is some bureaucrat a million miles away telling them what they can and cannot do to survive.
Last edited by ESTU on Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wyrd bið ful arad.
There is a time for all things.
I don't support moral relativism. I just support my relativism.
Better I spit it out now: I don't like gays, but lesbians are okay.

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:39 am

ESTU wrote:
The Sotoan Union wrote:This may be somewhat difficult to talk about considering it is hypothetical, but lets say history happens just like we predict it to. Let's say in the distant future humanity colonizes other moons and planets. Whether they be in this solar system or another is irrelevant. Let's say that in decades, to hundreds of years, the colonies have developed industry and infrastructure. They are self-sufficient to the point of not completely relaying on other colonies. They develop their own culture and identity. Just like on Earth, now these colonies want independence.

Should we give it to them? In modern society colonies are considered unethical, but that largely comes from European colonization of other peoples. No one saw anything wrong with the European colonies that were founded by Europeans (like the US or Brazil.) Furthermore what if these colonies are necessary? What if their resources are necessary to maintain civilization on Earth? What if Earth is so uninhabitable that humanity on it would dies without the colonies. Is there some philosophical need to keep humanity united as it spreads through the stars?

Personally I think these colonies would win independence eventually, just like in the real world. So they should be given independence when they want it.


They should be given independence from day one. The last thing the colonists need while breaking in a brand new and likely hostile world, is some bureaucrat a million miles away telling them what they can and cannot do to survive.


This begs the question why any Country and/or corporation would finance a multi-Billion Dollar colonization program if they won't have any say after its succesful realization.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:39 am

ESTU wrote:
The Sotoan Union wrote:This may be somewhat difficult to talk about considering it is hypothetical, but lets say history happens just like we predict it to. Let's say in the distant future humanity colonizes other moons and planets. Whether they be in this solar system or another is irrelevant. Let's say that in decades, to hundreds of years, the colonies have developed industry and infrastructure. They are self-sufficient to the point of not completely relaying on other colonies. They develop their own culture and identity. Just like on Earth, now these colonies want independence.

Should we give it to them? In modern society colonies are considered unethical, but that largely comes from European colonization of other peoples. No one saw anything wrong with the European colonies that were founded by Europeans (like the US or Brazil.) Furthermore what if these colonies are necessary? What if their resources are necessary to maintain civilization on Earth? What if Earth is so uninhabitable that humanity on it would dies without the colonies. Is there some philosophical need to keep humanity united as it spreads through the stars?

Personally I think these colonies would win independence eventually, just like in the real world. So they should be given independence when they want it.


They should be given independence from day one. The last thing the colonists need while breaking in a brand new and likely hostile world, is some bureaucrat a million miles away telling them what they can and cannot do to survive.

Let's say a colony starts when a thousand people spend a year in a cramped spaceship to set up a few buildings on a moon of Jupiter. Then the first transmission they get from Earth is a message telling them to figure it out on their own. Yeah that's a bad idea.
Last edited by The Sotoan Union on Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:40 am

Im wondering if the OP is eager to play the new Sid Meier's Civ game. :p
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Re: The ethics of space colonies

Postby Terra Sector Union » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:46 am

I was gonna say all space colonies should be under a central government but it really depends. You could have an Earth government ruling Martian colonies but somewhere in another solar system?

A colony light years away would diverge into a radically different civilization. Isolation is also another factor that can keep a colony from being controlled by a distant government. I'd say independence should be given to the them. I just believe planets should have one-world governments including Earth.

Edit: colonies are necessary for the survival of the species.
Last edited by Terra Sector Union on Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:48 am

Terra Sector Union wrote:I was gonna say all space colonies should be under a central government but it really depends. You could have an Earth government ruling Martian colonies but somewhere in another solar system?

A colony light years away would diverge into a radically different civilization. Isolation is also another factor that can keep a colony from being controlled by a distant government. I'd say independence should be given to the them. I just believe planets should have one-world governments including Earth.

But like historical colonies, many of these would be founded for resources. Some may be population centers, but most will simply be sources of resources. Colonies will likely specialize. Some will be agricutural, others industrial, others mining, etc. A central organization may be necessary just to maintain the trade between them and manage humanity's need for resources.
Last edited by The Sotoan Union on Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:54 am

What would stop them from declaring freedom?
I mean, colonizing is hard enough, but I doubt we could ever start a freaking space war.
???

User avatar
Seraven
Senator
 
Posts: 3570
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seraven » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:55 am

The Sotoan Union wrote:This may be somewhat difficult to talk about considering it is hypothetical, but lets say history happens just like we predict it to. Let's say in the distant future humanity colonizes other moons and planets. Whether they be in this solar system or another is irrelevant. Let's say that in decades, to hundreds of years, the colonies have developed industry and infrastructure. They are self-sufficient to the point of not completely relaying on other colonies. They develop their own culture and identity. Just like on Earth, now these colonies want independence.

Should we give it to them? In modern society colonies are considered unethical, but that largely comes from European colonization of other peoples. No one saw anything wrong with the European colonies that were founded by Europeans (like the US or Brazil.) Furthermore what if these colonies are necessary? What if their resources are necessary to maintain civilization on Earth? What if Earth is so uninhabitable that humanity on it would dies without the colonies. Is there some philosophical need to keep humanity united as it spreads through the stars?

Personally I think these colonies would win independence eventually, just like in the real world. So they should be given independence when they want it.


Yeah, well usually the central will refuse to grant them independence, and it will result in a war. In which the central may have the advantage as they probably arming the colonies with minimal military capability (to shot down asteroids and to suppress rebellions in colonies), but not with aliens.

If there are aliens.
Copper can change as its quality went down.
Gold can't change, for its quality never went down.
The Alma Mater wrote:
Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.

An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:55 am

Like the Phoenicians found, there is more to be gained by allowing independence and maintaining friendly relations.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Seraven
Senator
 
Posts: 3570
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seraven » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:57 am

Scepez wrote:What would stop them from declaring freedom?
I mean, colonizing is hard enough, but I doubt we could ever start a freaking space war.


If we refer by fictional element, the war is possible.

But then again, that fictional element involves mobile suit.
Copper can change as its quality went down.
Gold can't change, for its quality never went down.
The Alma Mater wrote:
Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.

An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:59 am

The Sotoan Union wrote:...Just like on Earth, now these colonies want independence. ...


Fighting a war over them would be economically and logistically idiotic. If they want to become independent let them.
.

User avatar
The zombie empire
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The zombie empire » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:01 am

I agree.

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:01 am

Depending on the Scenario in question, crushing planetary rebellions can be a piece of cake for central governments.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:02 am

Baltenstein wrote:Depending on the Scenario in question, crushing planetary rebellions can be a piece of cake for central governments.


Nuke them to ashes?
???

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Re: The ethics of space colonies

Postby Terra Sector Union » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:02 am

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Terra Sector Union wrote:I was gonna say all space colonies should be under a central government but it really depends. You could have an Earth government ruling Martian colonies but somewhere in another solar system?

A colony light years away would diverge into a radically different civilization. Isolation is also another factor that can keep a colony from being controlled by a distant government. I'd say independence should be given to the them. I just believe planets should have one-world governments including Earth.

But like historical colonies, many of these would be founded for resources. Some may be population centers, but most will simply be sources of resources. Colonies will likely specialize. Some will be agricutural, others industrial, others mining, etc. A central organization may be necessary just to maintain the trade between them and manage humanity's need for resources.


This is interesting. I always thought a space corp in the future could profit off of food to keep colonists fed. But colonists can mine resources, ship them back to Earth and get goods and infastructure development in return.

Whether space colonies are independent or not, they will have to rely on Earth until they can fully sustain itself.
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
Novia Soviet Socialist Republic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20360
Founded: Dec 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Novia Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:03 am

Of course they should have independence but that doesn't mean they should be cut off from Earth. I'd like to think we would have a sort of commonwealth type thing going on between Earth and it's colonies.
u wot m8

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:05 am

Scepez wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:Depending on the Scenario in question, crushing planetary rebellions can be a piece of cake for central governments.


Nuke them to ashes?


Got Death Star?
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Seraven
Senator
 
Posts: 3570
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seraven » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:05 am

Novia Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Of course they should have independence but that doesn't mean they should be cut off from Earth. I'd like to think we would have a sort of commonwealth type thing going on between Earth and it's colonies.


Space Commonwealth.
Copper can change as its quality went down.
Gold can't change, for its quality never went down.
The Alma Mater wrote:
Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.

An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:06 am

Novia Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Of course they should have independence but that doesn't mean they should be cut off from Earth. I'd like to think we would have a sort of commonwealth type thing going on between Earth and it's colonies.


But "Earth" is not a country. So even if we are talking about colonies, who would found them? The US? Russia? China? UK? And such a thing might lead to another Cold War. Except this time is solar.
???

User avatar
The zombie empire
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Sep 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The zombie empire » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:07 am

Seraven wrote:
Novia Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Of course they should have independence but that doesn't mean they should be cut off from Earth. I'd like to think we would have a sort of commonwealth type thing going on between Earth and it's colonies.


Space Commonwealth.


agreed.

User avatar
Seraven
Senator
 
Posts: 3570
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seraven » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:07 am

Scepez wrote:
Novia Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Of course they should have independence but that doesn't mean they should be cut off from Earth. I'd like to think we would have a sort of commonwealth type thing going on between Earth and it's colonies.


But "Earth" is not a country. So even if we are talking about colonies, who would found them? The US? Russia? China? UK? And such a thing might lead to another Cold War. Except this time is solar.


And funding expeditions to build space colonies need money, lots of money. The possible thing is that private corporations and nations working together.
Copper can change as its quality went down.
Gold can't change, for its quality never went down.
The Alma Mater wrote:
Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.

An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:08 am

Seraven wrote:
Scepez wrote:
But "Earth" is not a country. So even if we are talking about colonies, who would found them? The US? Russia? China? UK? And such a thing might lead to another Cold War. Except this time is solar.


And funding expeditions to build space colonies need money, lots of money. The possible thing is that private corporations and nations working together.


Oh jolly show, I'm going to see McDonald's ads on the Moon...
???

User avatar
United Provinces of Atlantica
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1852
Founded: Jan 02, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Provinces of Atlantica » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:11 am

I think that they shouldn't be considered colonies under a central government, but rather provincial parts of a federal system, so we could be stronger in potential dispute with other civilizations.

Anyways, if we do use traditional colonies instead (this would be a huge mistake nonetheless), they should be given independence, but we should all be in an EU-like situation.
Citizen of Lazarus
The Most Serene Confederation of Vasturia: FactbookConstitutionReligionOther
Warden in The Grey Wardens - Join Today!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Cretie, Eahland, Ineva, Jerzylvania, Likhinia, Luziyca, Maximum Imperium Rex, Plan Neonie, Sarolandia, Siluvia, Simonia, Skynavian Communes, Tiami, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads