NATION

PASSWORD

Is Marriage an out dated institution?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Your Opinion on the Institution of Marriage

The Decline of Marriage shows the moral decay happening in America
84
18%
The Decline of Marriage shows how far we've come from the traditionalism of the past
61
13%
Society is better off when more people are married
93
19%
Society is better off when less people are married
19
4%
Marriage rates reflect neither positively of negatively on a society
90
19%
The Decline of Marriage is ultimately a good thing
34
7%
The Decline of Marriage is ultimately a bad thing
81
17%
Other
15
3%
 
Total votes : 477

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129547
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:46 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Obeyistan wrote:Marriage is nothing but government getting involved in property transfer between two or more parties (inheritance and division of property, mainly). Hence, marriage as a governmental and legal institution should be abolished. This would also let people be with whoever they like, be it a partner of the same of different sex as them, a relative or multiple partners. Hence, no need to establish gay, incest or group marriages in a legal level.

There is more to the legal institution of marriage than property transfer, and the government involving itself in property transfers is, obviously, not necessarily a bad thing.


i had to register the deed on the house with the town,

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163886
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:07 pm

Obeyistan wrote:
Ifreann wrote:There is more to the legal institution of marriage than property transfer, and the government involving itself in property transfers is, obviously, not necessarily a bad thing.

What else is there to marriage as a legal institution excluding all the possible spiritual mumbojumbo?

Quite a bit.
As long as transactions are voluntary, a government is at best needless and at worst an obstacle.

Is that like how locks are needless at best and an obstacle at worst, as long as nobody is a thief?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
The British Galactic Empire
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 108
Founded: Aug 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The British Galactic Empire » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:13 pm

- If people want to get married they should do so.

- If they don't, they shouldn't.

- No one should prevent someone from getting married if they want to.

- No one should force someone to get married if they don't want to.

Four simple sentences that unfortunately most of the world (even the developed part) seems to have a hard time understanding.
Imagine the British Empire....in Space, with Star Destroyers!

User avatar
The New Sea Territory
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16992
Founded: Dec 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sea Territory » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:14 pm

If people want to get married, then go ahead. I see it as a religious and legal tool that really isn't necessary for love, so I don't see myself being married.
| Ⓐ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

User avatar
Communal Ecotopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1730
Founded: Feb 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Communal Ecotopia » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:22 pm

I am completely agnostic on social views on marriage as a whole...which is to say I don't care one whit what others do and believe marriage as an institution is neither beneficial nor generally harmful. I don't really see the lack of marriage today as either helpful or harmful to same-sex marriage, although I FULLY support SSM for those who want it. That said, I personally see absolutely no need for marriage for myself. I need no recognition before the State and God to love someone very deeply. Who or how I love is not the business of the State, though I firmly believe in monogamy and am not so secretly pretty mushy. It's just that I believe that mushiness is between me and my partner. I am, as yet, unmarried, but if my girlfriend of the future seriously wanted it, I would consent to marriage, despite my misgivings.
Political Compass -10, -9.28

User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:23 pm

I think marriage is institution that is symbolic and I don't believe it's outdated. Now, I'm not one of those people who goes on and on about how important marriage is, and I personally don't want to get married in the foreseeable future, but if two people want to get married, that's fine. It's a institution that's perfectly valid and a institution that should be available to all consenting couples.
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
Communal Ecotopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1730
Founded: Feb 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Communal Ecotopia » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:25 pm

Nuevo Meshiko wrote:
Frisbeeteria wrote:Marriage as a religious rite should be available to anyone who decides they want it.

Marriage as a social contract recognized by the government has some convenient elements, such as creating instant contracts / powers of attorney / offspring protection. Other aspects of governmental recognition, such as tax breaks and divorce laws, are obviously in need of revision. If the government is offering an advantageous contract arrangement to any citizens who meet certain conditions (such as cohabitation and shared financial risk), that contract agreement should be available to all citizens. The religious aspect shouldn't play any role at all.

Agreed. :clap:


And seconded.
Political Compass -10, -9.28

User avatar
Communal Ecotopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1730
Founded: Feb 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Communal Ecotopia » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:29 pm

Othelos wrote:Civil marriage isn't, I think, as it provides benefits & rights to the couple.

I probably wouldn't want to have a ceremony for getting married, but I would want to share those rights with my partner.


As laws stand, that makes sense. And, yeah, if I did get married, I'd either not want a ceremony or only a very small one. I don't understand these massive weddings designed for everybody but the two people making the commitment.
Political Compass -10, -9.28

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:41 pm

Communal Ecotopia wrote:
Othelos wrote:Civil marriage isn't, I think, as it provides benefits & rights to the couple.

I probably wouldn't want to have a ceremony for getting married, but I would want to share those rights with my partner.


As laws stand, that makes sense. And, yeah, if I did get married, I'd either not want a ceremony or only a very small one. I don't understand these massive weddings designed for everybody but the two people making the commitment.

there is no way I would spend more than $5,000 on it. The average wedding in America costs $30,000....

User avatar
Communal Ecotopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1730
Founded: Feb 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Communal Ecotopia » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:48 pm

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:well if we can't get rid of it then perhaps we can at least democratize it even more. if you can't beat them, join them :lol2:

perhaps the next step is legalizing polygamous marriages where they're not yet legal

Polyamorous marriages should definitely be legal


I absolutely agree, but how do we weed out the non-consensual/pseudo-consensual (I'm going to hell if I don't) marriages of folks like those in fundamentalist branches of the LDS Church.
Political Compass -10, -9.28

User avatar
Greater Weselton
Senator
 
Posts: 3703
Founded: Aug 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Weselton » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:50 pm

Marriage is still relevant.
I am not a Nazi in real life.
_[' ]_
(-_Q)
If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature!
Proud Member of theConfederation of Sovereign Nations

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:59 pm

Greater Weselton wrote:Marriage is still relevant.

yep.

User avatar
Rebellious Fishermen
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Rebellious Fishermen » Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:07 pm

Ultimately I think marriage is beneficial to a society.

There are so many times I've seen the variables in studies where a married person is more likely to earn more income, have lower crime rates, etc.

User avatar
The New Sea Territory
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16992
Founded: Dec 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sea Territory » Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:16 pm

Rebellious Fishermen wrote:Ultimately I think marriage is beneficial to a society.

There are so many times I've seen the variables in studies where a married person is more likely to earn more income, have lower crime rates, etc.


First, perhaps they have more income simply because there are two people's incomes rather than one? Isn't that obvious? Even still, you don't have to be married to be in a relationship. But married people get government benefits...which gives them an edge over non-married couple.

Secondly, source?
| Ⓐ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42334
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:52 pm

Othelos wrote:
Communal Ecotopia wrote:
As laws stand, that makes sense. And, yeah, if I did get married, I'd either not want a ceremony or only a very small one. I don't understand these massive weddings designed for everybody but the two people making the commitment.

there is no way I would spend more than $5,000 on it. The average wedding in America costs $30,000....


There are two things I would spend the money on, the photographer and the location (I do not mean hawaii).
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42334
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:53 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Rebellious Fishermen wrote:Ultimately I think marriage is beneficial to a society.

There are so many times I've seen the variables in studies where a married person is more likely to earn more income, have lower crime rates, etc.


First, perhaps they have more income simply because there are two people's incomes rather than one? Isn't that obvious? Even still, you don't have to be married to be in a relationship. But married people get government benefits...which gives them an edge over non-married couple.

Secondly, source?


There is such thing as common law marriage.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:09 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Othelos wrote:there is no way I would spend more than $5,000 on it. The average wedding in America costs $30,000....


There are two things I would spend the money on, the photographer and the location (I do not mean hawaii).

I personally would prefer a really small wedding (only family + really close friends) at a cool location. Also, won't have to pay for a wedding dress, so that takes out a huge chunk.

probably will just skip it altogether, though, because I don't feel anything special about marriage.

Donut section
 
Founded:

Postby Donut section » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:13 pm

Marriage is a useful institution for those who want to get married.

Being an adult and willing should be the only legal requirements for marriage.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42334
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:15 pm

Othelos wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
There are two things I would spend the money on, the photographer and the location (I do not mean hawaii).

I personally would prefer a really small wedding (only family + really close friends) at a cool location. Also, won't have to pay for a wedding dress, so that takes out a huge chunk.

probably will just skip it altogether, though, because I don't feel anything special about marriage.


I agree. My cousin had a huge wedding and I hated it. From my side I would probably max have 15 -20 people (my mom and brother, my aunts and uncles and their family, and my close friends)and that seems a little high for me. I would probably by a dress or suit that can be used again, nothing fancy. I do hold marriage as important, but that is in part due to how my mom treats it. It is very important for her, and so it is important for me.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:20 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Othelos wrote:I personally would prefer a really small wedding (only family + really close friends) at a cool location. Also, won't have to pay for a wedding dress, so that takes out a huge chunk.

probably will just skip it altogether, though, because I don't feel anything special about marriage.


I agree. My cousin had a huge wedding and I hated it. From my side I would probably max have 15 -20 people (my mom and brother, my aunts and uncles and their family, and my close friends)and that seems a little high for me. I would probably by a dress or suit that can be used again, nothing fancy. I do hold marriage as important, but that is in part due to how my mom treats it. It is very important for her, and so it is important for me.

You're different than I am, then. I couldn't care less about what my mom wants for my personal (relationship) life, although that's probably because she's a fundamentalist christian.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42334
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:38 pm

Othelos wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
I agree. My cousin had a huge wedding and I hated it. From my side I would probably max have 15 -20 people (my mom and brother, my aunts and uncles and their family, and my close friends)and that seems a little high for me. I would probably by a dress or suit that can be used again, nothing fancy. I do hold marriage as important, but that is in part due to how my mom treats it. It is very important for her, and so it is important for me.

You're different than I am, then. I couldn't care less about what my mom wants for my personal (relationship) life, although that's probably because she's a fundamentalist christian.


My mom and I have a close relation and she tends not to interfere with me. It is my choice simply because I know she wants to be there. It also has to do with the fact that my dad has passed on.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:21 pm

Communal Ecotopia wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:Polyamorous marriages should definitely be legal


I absolutely agree, but how do we weed out the non-consensual/pseudo-consensual (I'm going to hell if I don't) marriages of folks like those in fundamentalist branches of the LDS Church.

How do we weed out non-con marriages between 2 people?
There's your answer.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:23 pm

Othelos wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
There are two things I would spend the money on, the photographer and the location (I do not mean hawaii).

I personally would prefer a really small wedding (only family + really close friends) at a cool location. Also, won't have to pay for a wedding dress, so that takes out a huge chunk.

probably will just skip it altogether, though, because I don't feel anything special about marriage.

Oh man alive, sometimes I feel like the only romantic here. Big ball gown, nice suit, flowers everywhere, loads of guests...
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Communal Ecotopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1730
Founded: Feb 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Communal Ecotopia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:15 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Communal Ecotopia wrote:
I absolutely agree, but how do we weed out the non-consensual/pseudo-consensual (I'm going to hell if I don't) marriages of folks like those in fundamentalist branches of the LDS Church.

How do we weed out non-con marriages between 2 people?
There's your answer.


Yeah, you have a point...as usual. Poly relationships aren't any more susceptible...it's just that the ones we see most are sanctioned and encouraged by scary people. But, considering who I have as friends, I shouldn't have fallen into that trap.
Last edited by Communal Ecotopia on Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Political Compass -10, -9.28

User avatar
Communal Ecotopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1730
Founded: Feb 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Communal Ecotopia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:20 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Othelos wrote:I personally would prefer a really small wedding (only family + really close friends) at a cool location. Also, won't have to pay for a wedding dress, so that takes out a huge chunk.

probably will just skip it altogether, though, because I don't feel anything special about marriage.

Oh man alive, sometimes I feel like the only romantic here. Big ball gown, nice suit, flowers everywhere, loads of guests...


Not the only way to be romantic. Me, my partner, some flowers we grew, sunset, isolated beach (or above the fog bank at Mount Tamalpias...or in the aspens of my home state), the few folks who really matter...
Political Compass -10, -9.28

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerula, Dogmeat, ImSaLiA, Kernen, Pasong Tirad, Terra Magnifica Gloria, The Jamesian Republic, Turenia

Advertisement

Remove ads