Republic of Coldwater wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:I think the easiest way to think about it (at least in the Western world)... is that the Left Wing support new approaches to things and the Right Wing supports existing/older approaches to things.
This pretty much explains all situations. Its not necessarily based on freedom or equality. This is why you can have a Right Wing in one place that supports a pro-freedom position on one issue and an anti-freedom position in another society/culture.
In the US the Right Wing supports gun rights while the Right Wing in Europe doesn't. Why? Because it is tradition in one place and not tradition in another place.
Its therefore not inconsistent for the Right Wing to support some libertarian ideas (ex gun rights) while emphasizing authoritarian position on others (ex death penalty). Its about what is Tradition, subconsciously or consciously it tends to come back to that.
It also explains why the Right Wing used to support monarchy, but no longer support it.
This makes sense to some extent, except the Nazis are considered Far-Right even during their time when their idea of Fascism is relatively new. It also puts some ideas such as Libertarianism and the Whig Party out of the political spectrum as Libertarianism supports the old idea of Free Markets and new idea of ending drug prohibition and ending the death penalty. The Whig Party would also be off the spectrum as they support classical liberalism yet they support a central bank and centralized government, which are generally left-wing ideas.
Nazis = National Socialist. Not very rightish, actually.
However, today's Nazis are considered that way, because they tend to support ultraconservative parties. But Hitler and stuff? No, not really.