Dumb Ideologies wrote:Maybe one day you'll grow a prehensile tail and have a ukulele for a voice box.
Since it seems to be bizarre non sequitur day and all.
I am laughing so much, omg.
You're fucking amazing.
Advertisement
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:34 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Maybe one day you'll grow a prehensile tail and have a ukulele for a voice box.
Since it seems to be bizarre non sequitur day and all.
by The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:35 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:Oh yeah, the "only one right way to be trans" crowd. Don't forget the agender supremacists who claim that having any identity other than theirs is invalid, either.
More reasons we can't have nice things, I suppose.
Or the people who say I silence feminism by giving opinions when in female or transfeminine presence because I have "male passability privilege" and start to treat me like a "what about the menz" anti-feminist lite.
"*Rio's name* is indeed a man, folks. *Rio's name* only says shit. *Rio's name* can't be a feminist, not here and not wherever else. *Rio's name* nobody cares" A page with 5000+ followers in Facebook.
by Distruzio » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:36 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Arcturus Novus wrote:Haha, true. But nonbinary is typically considered a different thing. I think.
By prejudiced truscum and invasive cisgender people who invade our self-determination that got nothing to do what they think. We are 100% trans. Actually the concept of more trans or less trans based on gender identity, [desire for] body modification or a nonsense scale where people intimately associate both as mutually exclusive is very hurtful to all of us.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:39 pm
Distruzio wrote:Indeed. Which is why I dated pre-op as well as post-op M2F's. I didn't want to suggest to the woman that, in order to please me, she needed to modify her body in any way that she didn't already want to do.
by The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:41 pm
Distruzio wrote:Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:By prejudiced truscum and invasive cisgender people who invade our self-determination that got nothing to do what they think. We are 100% trans. Actually the concept of more trans or less trans based on gender identity, [desire for] body modification or a nonsense scale where people intimately associate both as mutually exclusive is very hurtful to all of us.
Indeed. Which is why I dated pre-op as well as post-op M2F's. I didn't want to suggest to the woman that, in order to please me, she needed to modify her body in any way that she didn't already want to do.
by Rocopurr » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:42 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Indeed. Which is why I dated pre-op as well as post-op M2F's. I didn't want to suggest to the woman that, in order to please me, she needed to modify her body in any way that she didn't already want to do.
Of course ! Who really needs a vagina for vaginal intercourse, right ?
by Zottistan » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:43 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Indeed. Which is why I dated pre-op as well as post-op M2F's. I didn't want to suggest to the woman that, in order to please me, she needed to modify her body in any way that she didn't already want to do.
Of course ! Who really needs a vagina for vaginal intercourse, right ?
by Dumb Ideologies » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:44 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Indeed. Which is why I dated pre-op as well as post-op M2F's. I didn't want to suggest to the woman that, in order to please me, she needed to modify her body in any way that she didn't already want to do.
Of course ! Who really needs a vagina for vaginal intercourse, right ?
by Arcturus Novus » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:45 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Indeed. Which is why I dated pre-op as well as post-op M2F's. I didn't want to suggest to the woman that, in order to please me, she needed to modify her body in any way that she didn't already want to do.
Of course ! Who really needs a vagina for vaginal intercourse, right ?
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.
by Distruzio » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:46 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Indeed. Which is why I dated pre-op as well as post-op M2F's. I didn't want to suggest to the woman that, in order to please me, she needed to modify her body in any way that she didn't already want to do.
Of course ! Who really needs a vagina for vaginal intercourse, right ?
by The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:53 pm
by Jormengand » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:54 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Who says that I'm only interested in vaginal intercourse?
Who says I´m interested in what you´re interested ?
I was just wondering, I got this bizarre notion that the genitalia makes the gender.
And the sex act per se. Imagine a pre-OP transman dating a girl. How he suppose to penetrate her ? With his huge, rock hard, sexy finger ?
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by Immoren » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:56 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Who says that I'm only interested in vaginal intercourse?
Who says I´m interested in what you´re interested ?
I was just wondering, I got this bizarre notion that the genitalia makes the gender.
And the sex act per se. Imagine a pre-OP transman dating a girl. How he suppose to penetrate her ? With his huge, rock hard, sexy finger ?
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:58 pm
Jormengand wrote:The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Who says I´m interested in what you´re interested ?
I was just wondering, I got this bizarre notion that the genitalia makes the gender.
And the sex act per se. Imagine a pre-OP transman dating a girl. How he suppose to penetrate her ? With his huge, rock hard, sexy finger ?
Dildos exist for a reason.
by Neutraligon » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:08 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Who says that I'm only interested in vaginal intercourse?
Who says I´m interested in what you´re interested ?
I was just wondering, I got this bizarre notion that the genitalia makes the gender.
And the sex act per se. Imagine a pre-OP transman dating a girl. How he suppose to penetrate her ? With his huge, rock hard, sexy finger ?
by Arcturus Novus » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:08 pm
Neutraligon wrote:The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Who says I´m interested in what you´re interested ?
I was just wondering, I got this bizarre notion that the genitalia makes the gender.
And the sex act per se. Imagine a pre-OP transman dating a girl. How he suppose to penetrate her ? With his huge, rock hard, sexy finger ?
Why is penetration necessary?
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.
by The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:09 pm
by Neutraligon » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:10 pm
by Zottistan » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:11 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Rocopurr wrote:That'd depend on who you ask. There are lots of ways for people with vaginas to please each other; you've just got to be creative.
Let me see if I get it. A pre-OP transman uses his vagina in a creative way to make the girl believe he´s got a penis ?
That must require a great deal of imagination. Great acting. Unbelievable suspension of disbelief from the girl. Intense role-play.
Pure fantasy sex. It´d be like a The Lord of The Rings/Porno mash-up.
by Arcturus Novus » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:12 pm
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.
by Rocopurr » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:12 pm
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Rocopurr wrote:That'd depend on who you ask. There are lots of ways for people with vaginas to please each other; you've just got to be creative.
Let me see if I get it. A pre-OP transman uses his vagina in a creative way to make the girl believe he´s got a penis ?
That must require a great deal of imagination. Great acting. Unbelievable suspension of disbelief from the girl. Intense role-play.
Pure fantasy sex. It´d be like a The Lord of The Rings/Porno mash-up.
by Neutraligon » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:13 pm
Rocopurr wrote:The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Let me see if I get it. A pre-OP transman uses his vagina in a creative way to make the girl believe he´s got a penis ?
That must require a great deal of imagination. Great acting. Unbelievable suspension of disbelief from the girl. Intense role-play.
Pure fantasy sex. It´d be like a The Lord of The Rings/Porno mash-up.
Why does he need a penis? You don't need anything phallic to have sex and orgasm.
by Jormengand » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:16 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by The Count of Monte Cristo » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:16 pm
Zottistan wrote:The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Let me see if I get it. A pre-OP transman uses his vagina in a creative way to make the girl believe he´s got a penis ?
That must require a great deal of imagination. Great acting. Unbelievable suspension of disbelief from the girl. Intense role-play.
Pure fantasy sex. It´d be like a The Lord of The Rings/Porno mash-up.
If she requires her sexual partners to have a penis, she should really be dating somebody who has a penis.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andavarast, Elwher, Floofybit, Hidrandia, Highway Eighty-Eight, Ifreann, Keltionialang, Kerwa, Merethin, TescoPepsi, The Two Jerseys
Advertisement