Advertisement
by Baltenstein » Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:59 am
by Socialist Czechia » Tue Sep 30, 2014 4:06 am
Baltenstein wrote:Interesting. The Czech narrative seems to be vastly different from the Polish one, an interesting observation considering Czechs and Poles are so much alike otherwise.
Are there also any significant differences between Czechs and Slovaks on the topic of Russia and the West?
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by Laerod » Tue Sep 30, 2014 4:09 am
Baltenstein wrote:Interesting. The Czech narrative seems to be vastly different from the Polish one, an interesting observation considering Czechs and Poles are so much alike otherwise.
Are there also any significant differences between Czechs and Slovaks on the topic of Russia and the West?
by Baltenstein » Tue Sep 30, 2014 4:19 am
Laerod wrote:Baltenstein wrote:Interesting. The Czech narrative seems to be vastly different from the Polish one, an interesting observation considering Czechs and Poles are so much alike otherwise.
Are there also any significant differences between Czechs and Slovaks on the topic of Russia and the West?
Remember, you're also taking Czechia's word for it here. It's not insignificant that the alleged Czech worldview seems to overlap completely with his or her own.
by Socialist Czechia » Tue Sep 30, 2014 4:26 am
Laerod wrote:Baltenstein wrote:Interesting. The Czech narrative seems to be vastly different from the Polish one, an interesting observation considering Czechs and Poles are so much alike otherwise.
Are there also any significant differences between Czechs and Slovaks on the topic of Russia and the West?
Remember, you're also taking Czechia's word for it here. It's not insignificant that the alleged Czech worldview seems to overlap completely with his or her own.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by Laerod » Tue Sep 30, 2014 4:57 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:Laerod wrote:Remember, you're also taking Czechia's word for it here. It's not insignificant that the alleged Czech worldview seems to overlap completely with his or her own.
Should I give you a links to our President's and Prime Minister's pro-russian articles, and official national polls what people think about Russia?
by Socialist Czechia » Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:40 am
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta
by Organized States » Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:53 am
by Washington Resistance Army » Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:58 am
by Organized States » Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:59 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Bush was right about something? Well these are the end times I guess...
by Seraven » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:10 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Bush was right about something? Well these are the end times I guess...
The Alma Mater wrote:Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.
An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P
by The German Democratic Reich » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:11 am
by Tuub » Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:38 am
by Bundabunda » Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:31 pm
by Al Nahar » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:21 pm
The problem isn't that the US pulled out of Iraq too early. It's that we appointed a high school teacher to run the country into the ground. What happened next was pretty much the Stanford Experiments replicating themselves IRL.
We could've stayed in Iraq until 2300 AD and it wouldn't have changed the brutality of the idiot that was left in charge.
by Tuub » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:31 pm
Al Nahar wrote:
That military aid will obviously go to the puppets Hezbollah, if not the units in the Lebanese army that work with hezbollah.
by Tuub » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:35 pm
Al Nahar wrote:The problem is your country had no right what so ever to invade Iraq and eliminate the only force capable of standing head to head against the fanatical terrorist sponsoring revolutionary Iranian regime.
by Al Nahar » Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:44 pm
Tuub wrote:Al Nahar wrote:
That military aid will obviously go to the puppets Hezbollah, if not the units in the Lebanese army that work with hezbollah.
Ofcourse it wouldn't go to Hezbollah, If Iran would send weapons there they would do it through the Lebenase government. Besides that, all Lebanese units are currently working with Hezbollah to keep the borders safe, but that doesn't chang anything. Deal was made with the Lebanese government and they will say where the weapons go to, not Iran. I don't even understand where you get those wierd ideas from.
by Tuub » Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:01 pm
Al Nahar wrote:Tuub wrote:
Ofcourse it wouldn't go to Hezbollah, If Iran would send weapons there they would do it through the Lebenase government. Besides that, all Lebanese units are currently working with Hezbollah to keep the borders safe, but that doesn't chang anything. Deal was made with the Lebanese government and they will say where the weapons go to, not Iran. I don't even understand where you get those wierd ideas from.
Lol really? Come on man, you are really telling me the Lebanese government which is blackmailed and heavily influenced by Hezbollah would just sit there and let the weapons go to its Army. The lebanese army is working with hezbollah because it has to 1. because its being ordered to via the government which is blackmailed and influenced by hezbollah. 2. If hezbollah is working to protect Lebanon why dont they just merge with the Army? Oh yes because they are the puppet and instrument of Iran which needs them as a special force to save the Assad regime and continue to use Lebanon as a base to expand their influence. The whole world knows the lebanese government is at the mercy of Hezbollah, and that will remain as long as the Christians in Lebanon are divided. If you have visited Lebanon or even stayed there for a bit in areas like Achrafieh, Gemayzeh, Jounieh you will find out that Hezbollah has been buying apartments in sunni and christian areas and filling them up with hezbollah cells. At any moment any move against hezbollah in non-hezbollah Beirut can be ambushed in their own areas by Hezbollah. A unified politically independent Lebanese army would stay the hell out of Syria's affairs and protect the borders on its own.
To your second point, Saddam Hussein was a dictator of course he is gonna have more killed than an organization based in South Lebanon, that could go for any dictator. Saddam was the obstacle to the terrorist regime you support and like(I claim this based on our previous discussions). The Americans never really cared for Saddam for him to be called a puppet and expand the USs goals. I mean lets face it the Americans were supporting Saddam with intelligence and then next they were selling arms to the Iranians for funds to support the Contras in Nicaragua. Also we forgot how the Israelis were also supporting Iran. The Arab world is much better off without Terrorist sponsoring nations like Iran and Qatar.
by Organized States » Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:08 pm
Bundabunda wrote:
The problem isn't that the US pulled out of Iraq too early. It's that we appointed a high school teacher to run the country into the ground. What happened next was pretty much the Stanford Experiments replicating themselves IRL.
We could've stayed in Iraq until 2300 AD and it wouldn't have changed the brutality of the idiot that was left in charge.
by The balkens » Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:41 pm
by Ainin » Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:13 am
Empire of Narnia wrote:Is ISIS dead yet?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, IKV Nemesis, Ineva, Shrillland, The Black Forrest, Uiiop
Advertisement