Advertisement
by Alyakia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:59 am
by Baltenstein » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:01 am
Czechanada wrote:Kouralia wrote:So?
Are you implying that there is absolutely no Celticness left in England? The Saxons, true, did smash the shit out of the Celts, but they didn't set up some nazi-esque-death-camp-cleansing system to destroy all living celts who hadn't fled to Cornwall, Wales or Scotland.
That's a bit of an implied argument.
by United Kingdom of Kent » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:02 am
by Organized States » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:04 am
United Kingdom of Kent wrote:I'm concerned whether the yes supporters would accept a No outcome.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:04 am
by Alyakia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:05 am
United Kingdom of Kent wrote:I'm concerned whether the yes supporters would accept a No outcome.
by Napkiraly » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:05 am
United Kingdom of Kent wrote:I'm concerned whether the yes supporters would accept a No outcome.
by United Kingdom of Kent » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:07 am
by Machtergreifung » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:12 am
United Kingdom of Kent wrote:Alyakia wrote:
do you have any real reason to think this whatsoever or is it just ooooh scary?
It's more based upon the growing anti-English and Union sentiment that has been demonstrated by the more extreme yes supporters and the cases of physical confrontation the extreme yes supporters have demonstrated during the course of the campaign.
by Czechanada » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:12 am
by Eaglleia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:13 am
United Kingdom of Kent wrote:Alyakia wrote:
do you have any real reason to think this whatsoever or is it just ooooh scary?
It's more based upon the growing anti-English and Union sentiment that has been demonstrated by the more extreme yes supporters and the cases of physical confrontation the extreme yes supporters have demonstrated during the course of the campaign.
by Alyakia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:13 am
United Kingdom of Kent wrote:Alyakia wrote:
do you have any real reason to think this whatsoever or is it just ooooh scary?
It's more based upon the growing anti-English and Union sentiment that has been demonstrated by the more extreme yes supporters and the cases of physical confrontation the extreme yes supporters have demonstrated during the course of the campaign.
by Ainin » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:15 am
by Not-Hekk » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:15 am
by Eaglleia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:16 am
Ainin wrote:Organized States wrote:I still doubt Scotland's going to be willing to shell out the money to buy fighter aircraft.
There's a lot of variables that would be involved in that decision though. The most important one being the state of the economy if Scotland secedes. Personally, I agree with Credit Suisse that it's all going to go to shit.
by Pola » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:17 am
by Alyakia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:18 am
Pola wrote:If I was Scottish, I would vote NO.
Cause England and Scotland have been together since the 1700s
It's like the stupid Flemish separatists here in Flanders...
I'm a Belgian... not Flemish.. And I'm from the Antwerp Province so, yeah... Long live United Belgium and the UK (Britland)
([url=http://s29.postimg.org/shaopmxjr/Zozi.png]Image)[/url]
([url=http://s24.postimg.org/5jmjee6mt/Belgie_Vlag.jpg]Image)[/url]
by Napkiraly » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:18 am
Not-Hekk wrote:Olivaero wrote:The English are descended from Celts. Well as much as they are from the Anglo-Saxons any way.
England means 'land of the angles' man. English is Anglo-Saxon. Boudicca's tribe lived in the roman province of Britain, which means they were British or Celtic or Gaellic or whatever but not English, its just that the part of Britain she lived in is now what we call England. England and the English didn't come to Britain for about 300 years after Boudicca was dead.
If anything the modern English are more related to the Angles, the Saxons, the Danes and the Normans more than they are to the Celts and the original British Peoples.
by Eaglleia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:20 am
Calisu wrote:So if Scotland leaves the UK could a common wealth country replace them? If so let Canada join the UK.
Rutannia wrote:Any thoughts on the stories of people going to polling stations intending to vote No, but suddenly deciding to vote Yes? It may be happening in reverse as well, but not too sure.
Not-Hekk wrote:Olivaero wrote:The English are descended from Celts. Well as much as they are from the Anglo-Saxons any way.
England means 'land of the angles' man. English is Anglo-Saxon. Boudicca's tribe lived in the roman province of Britain, which means they were British or Celtic or Gaellic or whatever but not English, its just that the part of Britain she lived in is now what we call England. England and the English didn't come around for about 300 years after Boudicca was dead.
If anything the modern English are more related to the Angles, the Saxons, the Danes and the Normans more than they are to the Celts and the original British Peoples.
by Ifreann » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:22 am
by Alyakia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:23 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Cyptopir, General TN, Plan Neonie, Tungstan, Uiiop
Advertisement