Pro-Disease movement, and decline in Vitamin shots

[Tuthina]

Is it just me, or do others also suspect that the members of the Pro-Disease movement are undercover worshippers of Nurgle, the Chaos God of Disease, Decay, and Destruction? In order to make sure if we're dealing with Nurgle cultists here, try and find the following symbol on pictures featuring Pro-Disease activists:

(Image)

All hail father Nurgle!

[Mavorpen]

You really don't understand what makes up an argument, do you?

Prove it wrong, if you can. And stop whining, ffs.

I don't have to prove anything. That's not how debates work. You made a claim. You made the burden of proof. Back It up or stop making shit up

[Ashmoria]

your post is the same kind of unscientific crap that gets these parents to put their children in danger.

the evidence that what you have "heard" is stupid is the lack of mass epidemics and how we no longer fear the diseases that vaccines protect us against because they occur so infrequently.

I mean, if they want to be anti-vaccine, they should be talking about actual problems like overuse in the livestock industry.

yeah. at least that makes sense. ....anti-antibiotics overuse. anti-growth hormone.

[Oaledonia]

You really don't understand what makes up an argument, do you?

Prove it wrong, if you can. And stop whining, ffs.

I listed my hypothesis on the issue based on some documentaries and articles that I've seen and read years ago. Do you seriously expect me to know anything about biology and such? It was more like a question or a "maybe, therefore x" than a 100% sure claim.

"It's a hypothesis I made by reading some shit, of course I'm not going to back it with science!"

Burden of proof.

[Segland]

Time to thin the herd. Let Darwinism take place.

That's sick. Children shouldn't suffer for their parents incompetence.

Exactly. It's total bullshit to pull the "natural selection" argument, considering the ones who are actually making the uniformed choices are the ones who survive.

[Sdaeriji]

You really don't understand what makes up an argument, do you?

Prove it wrong, if you can. And stop whining, ffs.

I listed my hypothesis on the issue based on some documentaries and articles that I've seen and read years ago. Do you seriously expect me to know anything about biology and such? It was more like a question or a "maybe, therefore x" than a 100% sure claim.

I read a magazine article that said that you've raped over 40 children. Prove it wrong.

[Reliquiae]

Time to thin the herd. Let Darwinism take place.

That's sick. Children shouldn't suffer for their parents incompetence.

Yet that is how this world works.

[Magna Libero]

Excuse me, sir? Don't you have anything that actually contributes to the discussion?

your post is the same kind of unscientific crap that gets these parents to put their children in danger.

the evidence that what you have "heard" is stupid is the lack of mass epidemics and how we no longer fear the diseases that vaccines protect us against because they occur so infrequently.

But wouldn't a careless giving of a lot of vaccinations even for the smallest problems -- for example in a "third world country"-- be a possible factor for a supervirus?

And again just for clarification I'm not frickin' claiming anything. I'm not a scientist, I'm just interested to know if the public opinion has taken everything into account and also trying to be skeptical in general.

[Lalaki]

Vaccinations are probably one of the best modern inventions humanity has ever come up with. It ranks up there with antibiotics, widespread communication via the phone and the Internet, etc.

People need to reject conspiracies to protect their children. The pharmacies aren't there to get you. They are there to help.

[Des-Bal]

Or they have been misinformed.

If you allow yourself to be misinformed when the correct information is being thrust upon you from every other source you are in fact stupid.

[Tuthina]

your post is the same kind of unscientific crap that gets these parents to put their children in danger.

the evidence that what you have "heard" is stupid is the lack of mass epidemics and how we no longer fear the diseases that vaccines protect us against because they occur so infrequently.

But wouldn't a careless giving of a lot of vaccinations even for the smallest problems -- for example in a "third world country"-- be a possible factor for a supervirus?

And again just for clarification I'm not frickin' claiming anything. I'm not a scientist, I'm just interested to know if the public opinion has taken everything into account and also trying to be skeptical in general.

You are confusing vaccination with (reckless use of) antibiotics, which works on bacteria instead of virus anyway.

[Oaledonia]

That's sick. Children shouldn't suffer for their parents incompetence.

Yet that is how this world works.

Yet that doesn't make it right. Unlike other animals, we have the social construct of morality, so quit the post-modernism.

[Mavorpen]

your post is the same kind of unscientific crap that gets these parents to put their children in danger.

the evidence that what you have "heard" is stupid is the lack of mass epidemics and how we no longer fear the diseases that vaccines protect us against because they occur so infrequently.

But wouldn't a careless giving of a lot of vaccinations even for the smallest problems -- for example in a "third world country"-- be a possible factor for a supervirus?

And again just for clarification I'm not frickin' claiming anything. I'm not a scientist, I'm just interested to know if the public opinion has taken everything into account and also trying to be skeptical in general.

Did someone clock that backpedal? Must have been FTL.

[Condunum]

your post is the same kind of unscientific crap that gets these parents to put their children in danger.

the evidence that what you have "heard" is stupid is the lack of mass epidemics and how we no longer fear the diseases that vaccines protect us against because they occur so infrequently.

But wouldn't a careless giving of a lot of vaccinations even for the smallest problems -- for example in a "third world country"-- be a possible factor for a supervirus?

And again just for clarification I'm not frickin' claiming anything. I'm not a scientist, I'm just interested to know if the public opinion has taken everything into account and also trying to be skeptical in general.

Superviruses are produced by not following treatment regimes to the word. If your Doctor tells you to take penicillin for two months, you do not take it for 6 weeks. You take it for 8 weeks, and report back to him or her.

[The IASM]

Make them mandatory as quiet frankly I don't care about their stupid believes, those children need this.

[Ashmoria]

your post is the same kind of unscientific crap that gets these parents to put their children in danger.

the evidence that what you have "heard" is stupid is the lack of mass epidemics and how we no longer fear the diseases that vaccines protect us against because they occur so infrequently.

But wouldn't a careless giving of a lot of vaccinations even for the smallest problems -- for example in a "third world country"-- be a possible factor for a supervirus?

And again just for clarification I'm not frickin' claiming anything. I'm not a scientist, I'm just interested to know if the public opinion has taken everything into account and also trying to be skeptical in general.

no

and why would you want to have millions of people die rather than risk that some day some new disease might come along?

[Scomagia]

But wouldn't a careless giving of a lot of vaccinations even for the smallest problems -- for example in a "third world country"-- be a possible factor for a supervirus?

And again just for clarification I'm not frickin' claiming anything. I'm not a scientist, I'm just interested to know if the public opinion has taken everything into account and also trying to be skeptical in general.

Did someone clock that backpedal? Must have been FTL.

299,792,457 meters per second, so just a touch under the speed of light.

[Des-Bal]

But wouldn't a careless giving of a lot of vaccinations even for the smallest problems -- for example in a "third world country"-- be a possible factor for a supervirus?

And again just for clarification I'm not frickin' claiming anything. I'm not a scientist, I'm just interested to know if the public opinion has taken everything into account and also trying to be skeptical in general.

Skepticism is good you're being contrary which is bad.

[Reliquiae]

Yet that is how this world works.

Yet that doesn't make it right. Unlike other animals, we have the social construct of morality, so quit the post-modernism.

I beg to differ. "Humanity" and "Morals" do not belong in the same sentence. No matter how hard we try to be civilized, we as a race, fail horribly and revert back to our animal nature.

[Oaledonia]

Yet that doesn't make it right. Unlike other animals, we have the social construct of morality, so quit the post-modernism.

I beg to differ. "Humanity" and "Morals" do not belong in the same sentence. No matter how hard we try to be civilized, we as a race, fail horribly and revert back to our animal nature.

Edgy, but I already told you to knock off the post-modernism.

[Scomagia]

Yet that doesn't make it right. Unlike other animals, we have the social construct of morality, so quit the post-modernism.

I beg to differ. "Humanity" and "Morals" do not belong in the same sentence. No matter how hard we try to be civilized, we as a race, fail horribly and revert back to our animal nature.

Our animal nature is inclined towards civilization, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

[Des-Bal]

I beg to differ. "Humanity" and "Morals" do not belong in the same sentence. No matter how hard we try to be civilized, we as a race, fail horribly and revert back to our animal nature.

Our animal nature and our idea of morality are not unrelated. Humans as animals created moral codes for reasons that make sense in the context of our animal nature.

[Condunum]

I beg to differ. "Humanity" and "Morals" do not belong in the same sentence. No matter how hard we try to be civilized, we as a race, fail horribly and revert back to our animal nature.

Our animal nature and our idea of morality are not unrelated. Humans as animals created moral codes for reasons that make sense in the context of our animal nature.

As can be seen in other primates, who develop loose and sometimes incredibly strict mores in their societies.

[Segland]

I beg to differ. "Humanity" and "Morals" do not belong in the same sentence. No matter how hard we try to be civilized, we as a race, fail horribly and revert back to our animal nature.

Our animal nature and our idea of morality are not unrelated. Humans as animals created moral codes for reasons that make sense in the context of our animal nature.

Most social constructs have the intent of preserving our species and promoting overall progression -- overriding the innate animal nature is impossible for now, but humanity and morality do go hand in hand.

[Mavorpen]

Yet that is how this world works.

Yet that doesn't make it right. Unlike other animals, we have the social construct of morality, so quit the post-modernism.

No, several animal species have morality.