NATION

PASSWORD

Your Opinion of Political Correctness

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:19 am

Ucropi wrote:
Caninope wrote:Under your logic, why not? Why should you have to convenience yourself with not insulting everyone you meet?

How do you people not understand that there is a difference between being allowed to do something and actually doing it?

Tomorrow murder could stop being illegal. Am I going to murder people? No.


This whole thread is full of people saying they want to do the thing.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Caninope
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24620
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Caninope » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:20 am

Ucropi wrote:
Caninope wrote:Under your logic, why not? Why should you have to convenience yourself with not insulting everyone you meet?

How do you people not understand that there is a difference between being allowed to do something and actually doing it?

I very well understand this.

However, Viritica said that he didn't want to inconvenience himself for anybody, so I'm asking why he inconveniences himself with doing stuff like even learning their names.
I'm the Pope
Secretly CIA interns stomping out negative views of the US
Türkçe öğreniyorum ama zorluk var.
Winner, Silver Medal for Debating
Co-Winner, Bronze Medal for Posting
Co-Winner, Zooke Goodwill Award

Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:
Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.

Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.

User avatar
Ucropi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1362
Founded: Sep 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ucropi » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:20 am

Sdaeriji wrote:
Ucropi wrote:How do you people not understand that there is a difference between being allowed to do something and actually doing it?

Tomorrow murder could stop being illegal. Am I going to murder people? No.


This whole thread is full of people saying they want to do the thing.

No pretty sure it's full of people saying they don't want to be told they can't do something they weren't.
Go home America, my country already has freedom
Things I Like:
Communism, Equality, Science, Art

Things I Hate:
Capitalism, America, Religion

User avatar
Altarica
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Altarica » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:20 am

Ucropi wrote:
Caninope wrote:Under your logic, why not? Why should you have to convenience yourself with not insulting everyone you meet?

How do you people not understand that there is a difference between being allowed to do something and actually doing it?

Tomorrow murder could stop being illegal. Am I going to murder people? No.


Exactly right. Many people think that if there is no legislation against a particular problem then people will be unable to restrain themselves from doing it. Give people responsibility for themselves.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:21 am

Ucropi wrote:
Sdaeriji wrote:
This whole thread is full of people saying they want to do the thing.

No pretty sure it's full of people saying they don't want to be told they can't do something they weren't.


You clearly have not read the thread, then.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112541
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:22 am

Viritica wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
I'm not one of those people who think "illegal immigrant" is offensive. However, "illegal(s)" has become a racially charged attack at Latinos during all this 1 year-long debate spanning multiple networks (NS is not the only network that actually is debating immigration on the net).

It's why in debates I tend to correct people to use "illegal immigrant" if they must use a term that is not "undocumented immigrant".

I can live with that. But there are people who would go so far as I go want to eliminate the term "illegal immigrant".

And there are people who want to ban dogs, too. We don't take them all seriously. The point is, if someone says they're offended by what you say you ought to ask why and see if they have a reasonable point. What I see going on here in these discussions of political correctness is people getting bent out of shape because they can't act like assholes all the time (not you specifically) or because they think a political agenda is being forced on them. The former is not a valid reason to question PC, the latter is, but the discussion should be had on the issues, not just an exchange of "You can't tell me what to say!" and "Why are you insistent on being a dick?" That gets us nowhere.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Caninope
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24620
Founded: Nov 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Caninope » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:22 am

Altarica wrote:
Ucropi wrote:How do you people not understand that there is a difference between being allowed to do something and actually doing it?

Tomorrow murder could stop being illegal. Am I going to murder people? No.


Exactly right. Many people think that if there is no legislation against a particular problem then people will be unable to restrain themselves from doing it. Give people responsibility for themselves.

No one has advocated for legislation in this thread to the best of my knowledge, at least certainly not for the last few pages.
I'm the Pope
Secretly CIA interns stomping out negative views of the US
Türkçe öğreniyorum ama zorluk var.
Winner, Silver Medal for Debating
Co-Winner, Bronze Medal for Posting
Co-Winner, Zooke Goodwill Award

Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:
Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.

Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6435
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Juristonia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:27 am

Altarica wrote:
Ucropi wrote:How do you people not understand that there is a difference between being allowed to do something and actually doing it?

Tomorrow murder could stop being illegal. Am I going to murder people? No.


Exactly right. Many people think that if there is no legislation against a particular problem then people will be unable to restrain themselves from doing it. Give people responsibility for themselves.


We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.
From the river to the sea

Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.

And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

User avatar
Ucropi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1362
Founded: Sep 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ucropi » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:28 am

Juristonia wrote:
Altarica wrote:
Exactly right. Many people think that if there is no legislation against a particular problem then people will be unable to restrain themselves from doing it. Give people responsibility for themselves.


We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.

Political Correctness is exactly that! You are telling them what they can and cannot say.
Go home America, my country already has freedom
Things I Like:
Communism, Equality, Science, Art

Things I Hate:
Capitalism, America, Religion

User avatar
Altarica
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Altarica » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:28 am

Caninope wrote:
Altarica wrote:
Exactly right. Many people think that if there is no legislation against a particular problem then people will be unable to restrain themselves from doing it. Give people responsibility for themselves.

No one has advocated for legislation in this thread to the best of my knowledge, at least certainly not for the last few pages.


I was using legislation as an example. Many people were saying that if it wasn't for political correctness then everybody would be being insulted by everybody else. I was simply pointing out that people still have responsibility over themselves and just because they can doesn't mean they will.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:29 am

Ucropi wrote:
Juristonia wrote:
We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.

Political Correctness is exactly that! You are telling them what they can and cannot say.

No. Try again.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:29 am

Ucropi wrote:
Juristonia wrote:
We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.

Political Correctness is exactly that! You are telling them what they can and cannot say.


No, we're not.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Altarica
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Altarica » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:30 am

Juristonia wrote:
Altarica wrote:
Exactly right. Many people think that if there is no legislation against a particular problem then people will be unable to restrain themselves from doing it. Give people responsibility for themselves.


We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.


Political correctness is telling people that certain language is unacceptable, in my view that's censoring free speech.

User avatar
Ucropi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1362
Founded: Sep 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ucropi » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:30 am

Sdaeriji wrote:
Ucropi wrote:Political Correctness is exactly that! You are telling them what they can and cannot say.


No, we're not.

If you weren't telling people what to say PC wouldn't exist.
Go home America, my country already has freedom
Things I Like:
Communism, Equality, Science, Art

Things I Hate:
Capitalism, America, Religion

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6435
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Juristonia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:31 am

Ucropi wrote:
Juristonia wrote:
We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.

Political Correctness is exactly that! You are telling them what they can and cannot say.


This is, what, the sixth time you've illustrated not having a clue what PC actually means now?
From the river to the sea

Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.

And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:31 am

Altarica wrote:
Juristonia wrote:
We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.


Political correctness is telling people that certain language is unacceptable, in my view that's censoring free speech.


How is that censoring? If I tell you I find your language unacceptable, are you restrained or prohibited from using it anyway?
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6435
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Juristonia » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:31 am

Altarica wrote:
Juristonia wrote:
We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.


Political correctness is telling people that certain language is unacceptable, in my view that's censoring free speech.


Then your opinion is factually inaccurate since no one is legislating against free speech.
If anything, they're using free speech to criticize you.
From the river to the sea

Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.

And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:31 am

Ucropi wrote:
Sdaeriji wrote:
No, we're not.

If you weren't telling people what to say PC wouldn't exist.


That's not what political correctness is.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Ucropi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1362
Founded: Sep 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ucropi » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:32 am

Juristonia wrote:
Ucropi wrote:Political Correctness is exactly that! You are telling them what they can and cannot say.


This is, what, the sixth time you've illustrated not having a clue what PC actually means now?

As per Google
Google wrote:po·lit·i·cal cor·rect·ness
noun
the avoidance, often considered as taken to extremes, of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.
Go home America, my country already has freedom
Things I Like:
Communism, Equality, Science, Art

Things I Hate:
Capitalism, America, Religion

User avatar
Ucropi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1362
Founded: Sep 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ucropi » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:32 am

Sdaeriji wrote:
Ucropi wrote:If you weren't telling people what to say PC wouldn't exist.


That's not what political correctness is.

What is it then?
Go home America, my country already has freedom
Things I Like:
Communism, Equality, Science, Art

Things I Hate:
Capitalism, America, Religion

User avatar
Revanchism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1846
Founded: Dec 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Revanchism » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:32 am

Altarica wrote:
Juristonia wrote:
We do. And we reserve the right to address them based on how they use that responsibility.
This is about political correctness. Not eliminating free speech and legislating language.
They're two different things.


Political correctness is telling people that certain language is unacceptable, in my view that's censoring free speech.

Hahaha please tell me how your "freedom of speech" is being violated by people voicing their own opinions and saying "Dat shit's racist, yo."
I'm back for a bit
Norstal wrote:You ever watched a bad movie that is so bad, that it's enlightening? Like, you start asking yourself, "why did I watched this movie. What is the meaning of life after I watched this movie."
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Excuse me, I believe that the proper term is Satanic-American.
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Does Queen Elsa have a partnership with the Rothschild family in the film?
Kolmya wrote:

Should have been titled A Trve Friend.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
The Rodina wrote:It was american is hardly an argument.
It's the only argument I need.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:33 am

Ucropi wrote:
Juristonia wrote:
This is, what, the sixth time you've illustrated not having a clue what PC actually means now?

As per Google
Google wrote:po·lit·i·cal cor·rect·ness
noun
the avoidance, often considered as taken to extremes, of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.


That definition directly contradicts you.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:33 am

Ucropi wrote:
Sdaeriji wrote:
That's not what political correctness is.

What is it then?


Telling people who say offensive things that they're assholes.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Ucropi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1362
Founded: Sep 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ucropi » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:33 am

Revanchism wrote:
Altarica wrote:
Political correctness is telling people that certain language is unacceptable, in my view that's censoring free speech.

Hahaha please tell me how your "freedom of speech" is being violated by people voicing their own opinions and saying "Dat shit's racist, yo."

No it's the telling people what they can or cannot say that's censoring
Go home America, my country already has freedom
Things I Like:
Communism, Equality, Science, Art

Things I Hate:
Capitalism, America, Religion

User avatar
Altarica
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Altarica » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:33 am

Juristonia wrote:
Altarica wrote:
Political correctness is telling people that certain language is unacceptable, in my view that's censoring free speech.


Then your opinion is factually inaccurate since no one is legislating against free speech.
If anything, they're using free speech to criticize you.


I never mentioned legislation. Telling people that they cannot use certain language is certainly not free speech.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Ethel mermania, Infected Mushroom, Jerzylvania, Keltionialang, Kostane, Luziyca, New Ziedrich, Pencil Sharpeners 2, Philjia, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan, Uiiop, Valrifall, Welskerland

Advertisement

Remove ads