It didn't. Both secessions were illegal, until the British Empire recognised the US as a nation. The Confederacy was and always will be illegitimate for that reason.
Advertisement
by Kelinfort » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:14 am
by Ucropi » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:14 am
by Farnhamia » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:15 am
Lininiel wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Any individual who reads the secession documents issued by the several southern states, as well as the Alexander Stevens' Cornerstone Speech, will know what that flag stands for.
I said earlier that the flag stood for many things. Yes, slavery existed in the south. However I believe the Confederacy also stood for the right not to have the government involved in everything they did, a noble sentiment. I can only tell you that I do not support slavery of any race, but I will not see the day when one's right to fly a flag is denied just because someone else doesn't agree with them.
by Lininiel » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:17 am
Farnhamia wrote:Lininiel wrote:I said earlier that the flag stood for many things. Yes, slavery existed in the south. However I believe the Confederacy also stood for the right not to have the government involved in everything they did, a noble sentiment. I can only tell you that I do not support slavery of any race, but I will not see the day when one's right to fly a flag is denied just because someone else doesn't agree with them.
How can you claim the South stood for limited government in the face of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which required all law enforcement officials, on penalty of fines, to apprehend and return slaves, even in states where slavery was itself illegal, some of which states declared slaves entering their territory to be free? You can't have it both ways, non-interference your affairs and massive interference in the affairs of others. Remember, we're talking about bondage slavery, not some philosophical debate on politics. The history of the early Republic is one of a slow movement away from slavery by some states and a desperate clinging to it by others.
by Ucropi » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:18 am
Farnhamia wrote:Lininiel wrote:I said earlier that the flag stood for many things. Yes, slavery existed in the south. However I believe the Confederacy also stood for the right not to have the government involved in everything they did, a noble sentiment. I can only tell you that I do not support slavery of any race, but I will not see the day when one's right to fly a flag is denied just because someone else doesn't agree with them.
How can you claim the South stood for limited government in the face of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which required all law enforcement officials, on penalty of fines, to apprehend and return slaves, even in states where slavery was itself illegal, some of which states declared slaves entering their territory to be free? You can't have it both ways, non-interference your affairs and massive interference in the affairs of others. Remember, we're talking about bondage slavery, not some philosophical debate on politics. The history of the early Republic is one of a slow movement away from slavery by some states and a desperate clinging to it by others.
by Farnhamia » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:18 am
Lininiel wrote:As Voltaire said: I do not agree with what you are saying, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
by Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:20 am
Ucropi wrote:Farnhamia wrote:How can you claim the South stood for limited government in the face of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which required all law enforcement officials, on penalty of fines, to apprehend and return slaves, even in states where slavery was itself illegal, some of which states declared slaves entering their territory to be free? You can't have it both ways, non-interference your affairs and massive interference in the affairs of others. Remember, we're talking about bondage slavery, not some philosophical debate on politics. The history of the early Republic is one of a slow movement away from slavery by some states and a desperate clinging to it by others.
How can you say that the American revolution was based on wanting to have a fair government when they secede 4 years after Somerset v Stewart in which slavery was found unsupported by law?
by Ucropi » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:22 am
Sdaeriji wrote:Ucropi wrote:How can you say that the American revolution was based on wanting to have a fair government when they secede 4 years after Somerset v Stewart in which slavery was found unsupported by law?
She didn't say that.
by Farnhamia » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:22 am
Ucropi wrote:Farnhamia wrote:How can you claim the South stood for limited government in the face of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which required all law enforcement officials, on penalty of fines, to apprehend and return slaves, even in states where slavery was itself illegal, some of which states declared slaves entering their territory to be free? You can't have it both ways, non-interference your affairs and massive interference in the affairs of others. Remember, we're talking about bondage slavery, not some philosophical debate on politics. The history of the early Republic is one of a slow movement away from slavery by some states and a desperate clinging to it by others.
How can you say that the American revolution was based on wanting to have a fair government when they secede 4 years after Somerset v Stewart in which slavery was found unsupported by law?
by Ucropi » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:24 am
Farnhamia wrote:Ucropi wrote:How can you say that the American revolution was based on wanting to have a fair government when they secede 4 years after Somerset v Stewart in which slavery was found unsupported by law?
What does that have to do with the causes of the American Revolution? And anyway, the topic is the Confederate battle flag and what it stands for, not the American Revolution. You are welcome to start another thread on that subject.
by The Black Forrest » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:25 am
by The Black Forrest » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:26 am
Ucropi wrote:Farnhamia wrote:What does that have to do with the causes of the American Revolution? And anyway, the topic is the Confederate battle flag and what it stands for, not the American Revolution. You are welcome to start another thread on that subject.
You seriously don't see the parallels?
Both America and the CSA secede
Both are motivated by the fear of the loss of slavery
Both claim "higher" political reasons for secession
by Farnhamia » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:26 am
Ucropi wrote:Farnhamia wrote:What does that have to do with the causes of the American Revolution? And anyway, the topic is the Confederate battle flag and what it stands for, not the American Revolution. You are welcome to start another thread on that subject.
You seriously don't see the parallels?
Both America and the CSA secede
Both are motivated by the fear of the loss of slavery
Both claim "higher" political reasons for secession
by Ucropi » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:27 am
by Creamy pleasures » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:28 am
by Sdaeriji » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:28 am
Ucropi wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
The questions of the long thread or the Confederate flag and what it stands for.
The US flag or the actions of the Revolution are irrelevant.
I love how apparently no American can see the parallels between the American revolution and the Souths succession. If the confederate flag stands for slavery and rebellion why doesn't the american flag?
America had slavery hundreds of years longer than the CSA yet you claim the CSA flag stands for slavery? I don't understand.
by Farnhamia » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:30 am
by Lininiel » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:44 am
Farnhamia wrote:Once more, the topic is the Confederate battle flag and what it stands for. The topic is not the American Revolution and its origins.
The topic is locked for a short time for this to be seen by everyone.
by The Black Forrest » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:45 am
Ucropi wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
The questions of the long thread or the Confederate flag and what it stands for.
The US flag or the actions of the Revolution are irrelevant.
I love how apparently no American can see the parallels between the American revolution and the Souths succession. If the confederate flag stands for slavery and rebellion why doesn't the american flag?
America had slavery hundreds of years longer than the CSA yet you claim the CSA flag stands for slavery? I don't understand.
by The Black Forrest » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:47 am
Lininiel wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Once more, the topic is the Confederate battle flag and what it stands for. The topic is not the American Revolution and its origins.
The topic is locked for a short time for this to be seen by everyone.
Stop saying it is irrelevant. The similarities have been explained. Come up with a response. You are simply not helping anything with your denial of a valid point.
The American Revolution was not fought specifically to defend the institution of slavery. The War of Southern Treason was.
This question has been answered at least a dozen times. Please stop the threadjack.
by Ucropi » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:48 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Ucropi wrote:I love how apparently no American can see the parallels between the American revolution and the Souths succession. If the confederate flag stands for slavery and rebellion why doesn't the american flag?
America had slavery hundreds of years longer than the CSA yet you claim the CSA flag stands for slavery? I don't understand.
The French and the English had slaves before that so I am sure we can draw parallels.
It's a distraction and a weak attempt at justification.
Let's stay with the original question of what does the CSA flag represent.......
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, El Lazaro, Keltionialang, Kostane, Shrillland, Totoy Brown, Tungstan, Umeria
Advertisement