*** Warned for trolling ***
If you had said just "garbage" it would have been rude but no more.
Advertisement
by Farnhamia » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:15 pm
by Murkwood » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:49 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Arcadonisia » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:15 pm
by Delmonte » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:22 pm
The Batorys wrote:The Delmontese like money, yeah, but they also like to throw down.
[b][color=#0000FF][background=red]United in Opposition to [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?t=303025]Liberate Haven[/url][/background][/color][/b]
[color=#FF0000][b]Mallorea and Riva should [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=303090]resign[/url][/b][/color]
by Farnhamia » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:24 pm
Delmonte wrote:Arcadonisia wrote:
Just because it comes from a source you don't approve of doesn't mean there is no truth there.
Seriously. I love when people on NS dismiss things from the Heritage Foundation "BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN AGENDA!" There's literally no goddamn thing as a think tank without an agenda or they would have no funding. But they still want to maintain credibility, so they're going to do their homework. And the Heritage Foundation is incredibly highly regarded even by more left think tanks. A debate between conservatives and liberals on NationStates is done before it starts because NS liberals rarely accept evidence contrary to their opinion. They'll either say that it's from an invalid source or it's a conspiracy. It's absurd.
by Arcadonisia » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:27 pm
Delmonte wrote:Arcadonisia wrote:
Just because it comes from a source you don't approve of doesn't mean there is no truth there.
Seriously. I love when people on NS dismiss things from the Heritage Foundation "BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN AGENDA!" There's literally no goddamn thing as a think tank without an agenda or they would have no funding. But they still want to maintain credibility, so they're going to do their homework. And the Heritage Foundation is incredibly highly regarded even by more left think tanks. A debate between conservatives and liberals on NationStates is done before it starts because NS liberals rarely accept evidence contrary to their opinion. They'll either say that it's from an invalid source or it's a conspiracy. It's absurd.
by Delmonte » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:28 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Delmonte wrote:Seriously. I love when people on NS dismiss things from the Heritage Foundation "BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN AGENDA!" There's literally no goddamn thing as a think tank without an agenda or they would have no funding. But they still want to maintain credibility, so they're going to do their homework. And the Heritage Foundation is incredibly highly regarded even by more left think tanks. A debate between conservatives and liberals on NationStates is done before it starts because NS liberals rarely accept evidence contrary to their opinion. They'll either say that it's from an invalid source or it's a conspiracy. It's absurd.
One might say the same about NS conservatives. Didn't Murkwood just do what you accuse liberals of doing?
Arcadonisia wrote:Delmonte wrote:Seriously. I love when people on NS dismiss things from the Heritage Foundation "BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN AGENDA!" There's literally no goddamn thing as a think tank without an agenda or they would have no funding. But they still want to maintain credibility, so they're going to do their homework. And the Heritage Foundation is incredibly highly regarded even by more left think tanks. A debate between conservatives and liberals on NationStates is done before it starts because NS liberals rarely accept evidence contrary to their opinion. They'll either say that it's from an invalid source or it's a conspiracy. It's absurd.
Every single person and political entity has an Agenda. What matters is how you present your claims and what you are willing to do to prove its absolute validity and implement it.
The Batorys wrote:The Delmontese like money, yeah, but they also like to throw down.
[b][color=#0000FF][background=red]United in Opposition to [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?t=303025]Liberate Haven[/url][/background][/color][/b]
[color=#FF0000][b]Mallorea and Riva should [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=303090]resign[/url][/b][/color]
by Infected Mushroom » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:41 pm
Keyboard Warriors wrote:
Not even close. A lot of the talk about "how bad America is" is greatly over-exaggerated. It has flaws, but it's a stable country with generally high standards of living and where many opportunities abound.
by Blekksprutia » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:42 pm
by Death Metal » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:33 pm
Republic of Coldwater wrote:No, it hasn't been done in America, but it has been done in Hong Kong, and look where Hong Kong is at right now?
by Death Metal » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:35 pm
Republic of Coldwater wrote:It will work, as businesses would have more freedom to hire and do more things, which in turn helps the economy and generates wealth, while lowering taxes on the people will likely increase consumerism (pumps money in the economy) and make them richer overall (with less money given to the gov't)
by Death Metal » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:44 pm
European Socialist Republic wrote:Divair2 wrote:Your solution to catching up to the other nations.. is to do the opposite of what they're doing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_exceptionalism
by The Fascist American Empire » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:47 pm
Valica wrote:1) Retitle the thread to something similar to the name of the article.
2) Get ready for America's descent into a second-class nation. We won't be a world economic power for long.
Maybe I'm wrong and we'll make a comeback, but bad things keep getting worse.
We need a middle class.
You obviously do since you posted a response like the shifty little red velvet pseudo ant you are. Yes I am onto your little tricks you hissing pest you exoskeleton brier patch you. Now crawl back in to that patch of grass you call hell and hiss some more. -Benuty
by Ponderosa » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:03 pm
2) Get ready for America's descent into a second-class nation. We won't be a world economic power for long.
Retired WerePenguins wrote:That's the one thing I like about the WA; it allows me to shove my moral compass up your legislative branch, assuming a majority agrees.
Steve Prefontaine wrote:The best pace is a suicide pace, and today is a good day to die.
Christopher Hitchens wrote:Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence.
by Baader-Meinhof Gruppe » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:28 pm
Pandeeria wrote:Baader-Meinhof Gruppe wrote:
It was beautiful, but I wish they wouldn't refer to neo-liberalism as "economics". It's really not. The basic law of supply and demand refutes it. Damn Harvard and their shitty economics department using their name to sound smart when in reality they don't have the slightest clue what they are talking about...
Neo-liberalism is just more centrist then modern liberalism. It can be used in an exclusive economic fashion, or in a economic, political, social, and cultural fashion. Or any mix of those.
Harvard, as it stands today, is a very shitty college for how good they're claimed to be. Harvard uses it's prestige, name, and history to get people into applying.
by Geilinor » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:42 pm
Ponderosa wrote:2) Get ready for America's descent into a second-class nation. We won't be a world economic power for long.
Well, this is just silly and short-sighted. People have been saying this for years, especially during the Cold War. And guess what happened? It gets better.
by Death Metal » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:11 pm
Pope Joan wrote:Is it any secret that our wealthiest citizens have been fattening themselves at the expense of the rest of us, including the (shrinking) middle class?
by Viritica » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:16 pm
by Ponderosa » Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:03 am
Geilinor wrote:Ponderosa wrote:
Well, this is just silly and short-sighted. People have been saying this for years, especially during the Cold War. And guess what happened? It gets better.
The fact is that the standard of living is stagnating, it's clear to see in the article. When other wealthy countries are progressing faster than you are, it creates a problem.
Retired WerePenguins wrote:That's the one thing I like about the WA; it allows me to shove my moral compass up your legislative branch, assuming a majority agrees.
Steve Prefontaine wrote:The best pace is a suicide pace, and today is a good day to die.
Christopher Hitchens wrote:Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence.
by Ixzara » Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:27 am
Nervium wrote:Ixzara wrote:My spidey-senses are telling me that Freedom and Democracy are about to be brought to Canada.
That awkward moment when they find out Canadia doesn't exist.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ancientania, Big Eyed Animation, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, Elwher, Emotional Support Crocodile, Enormous Gentiles, Ethel mermania, General TN, Ifreann, Kreushia, La Paz de Los Ricos, Lans Isles, Pale Dawn, Republics of the Solar Union, Stellar Colonies, Talibanada, The Caleshan Valkyrie, Thermodolia, Tungstan
Advertisement