NATION

PASSWORD

is america losing its status as a superpower?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Cailfornia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

is america losing its status as a superpower?

Postby Cailfornia » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:09 am

In recent days it seems like our economy is slower then the rest of the world and our political and military prowess has decline. Is America still a superpower?

User avatar
Divair2
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6666
Founded: Feb 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair2 » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:11 am

Cailfornia wrote:In recent days it seems like our economy is slower then the rest of the world and our political and military prowess has decline. Is America still a superpower?

Yes.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:12 am

Yes, we are still a superpower.

What are your thoughts, OP?
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:19 am

Cailfornia wrote:In recent days it seems like our economy is slower then the rest of the world and our political and military prowess has decline. Is America still a superpower?

:rofl:
Impeach Obama, Reducing DoD budget is theft, Tea Party 2015.
.

User avatar
Jocabia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5273
Founded: Mar 25, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Jocabia » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:31 am

Cailfornia wrote:In recent days it seems like our economy is slower then the rest of the world and our political and military prowess has decline. Is America still a superpower?

Totally in decline. We barely have enough military firepower to take on the rest of the world together at this point.

Our weakest area, when it comes to military, is that we have a population that is such a small percentage in comparison to the rest of the world. Otherwise, we pretty much couldn't be more prepared for war.

That said, I genuinely hope our military power is in decline. We could cut it by three quarters and we'd still have the most technologically advanced military in the world and we'd have a much better economy.
Sgt Toomey wrote:Come to think of it, it would make more sense to hate him for being black. At least its half true..
JJ Place wrote:Sure, the statistics are that a gun is more likely to harm a family member than a criminal

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:33 am

Yes. Partially because of Neoliberal Fantasy land economics and the bountiful amount of americans running around shrieking "MUH CAPITALISM."
And partially because of the rise of the E.U drawing power further east.

Any fan of western civilization worth their salt shouldn't be focusing on retaining US hegenomy. It's a doomed project. We should be focusing on forging a network alliance to secure the rights and liberties of the world, and to protect the west.

The future is a US-EU diarchy, with the "outlying" western nations having significant sway.

The US should slash it's military budget a lot. Other western countries should quit being freeloaders and pick up the tab.

The UK, france, and Poland are paying their way. The rest appear to be freeloading.

A united EU army would go some way to correcting this.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Dejanic
Senator
 
Posts: 4677
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Dejanic » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:35 am

Yes, superpower wise I could see the EU-North America as some kind of joint superpower in the future, but the Usa on its own? Na.

I believe national superpowers are going to start being replaced by continental superpowers in the coming decades.
Last edited by Dejanic on Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:36 am

Cailfornia wrote:In recent days it seems like our economy is slower then the rest of the world and our political and military prowess has decline. Is America still a superpower?

No, that title obviously goes to Japan. America weren't able to defeat the combined Japanese Magical Girls Corps and their Mobile Armored Mecha Division. As a result, the U.S we knew in 2014 collapsed.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:36 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:The UK, france, and Poland are paying their way.

Yup, I totally see Britain and Poland paying for their two carriers each. Oh wait...
.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:37 am

Not really. The thing about being a superpower is having the Money and the Man Power is just part of it (the US still has ample both those things). It's also about playing the part, whilst the US has the know how and the political will to be a superpower it will be.

The Americans are willing to go pretty much anywhere on the globe and the same can't be said about emerging powers. Especially as the US has been criticized for doing it for such a long time.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:37 am

Risottia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:The UK, france, and Poland are paying their way.

Yup, I totally see Britain and Poland paying for their two carriers each. Oh wait...


Compared to Italy? Yeh, we're paying our way. Bitching that we can no longer afford to pay for your defence is just arrogance. Now we're simply paying for our own.
The British and French are paying for the defence of europe so you can all enjoy higher standards of living. We defended you so you could rebuild your shit economies over a period of 50/100 years.
That process is over, and now we expect you to start paying for your defence too.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:40 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:Yes. Partially because of Neoliberal Fantasy land economics and the bountiful amount of americans running around shrieking "MUH CAPITALISM."

Anyone living in the U.S would know that those kind of extremists only live in God Knows Where. Most states like California is pretty much working on a socialist model.

Risottia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:The UK, france, and Poland are paying their way.

Yup, I totally see Britain and Poland paying for their two carriers each. Oh wait...

The U.K and Poland are such emerging superpowers that they were the first responders when the Malaysian airplane went down...

Bahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha

God, even fucking China went ahead first.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Keyboard Warriors
Minister
 
Posts: 3306
Founded: Mar 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Keyboard Warriors » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:42 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Risottia wrote:Yup, I totally see Britain and Poland paying for their two carriers each. Oh wait...


Compared to Italy? Yeh, we're paying our way. Bitching that we can no longer afford to pay for your defence is just arrogance. Now we're simply paying for our own.
The British and French are paying for the defence of europe so you can all enjoy higher standards of living. We defended you so you could rebuild your shit economies over a period of 50/100 years.
That process is over, and now we expect you to start paying for your defence too.

So where the hell are you getting Poland out of all this?
Yes.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:43 am

Norstal wrote:The U.K and Poland are such emerging superpowers that they were the first responders when the Malaysian airplane went down...

Bahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha

God, even fucking China went ahead first.


Well to be fair Malaysia is quite near to China... I don't know if the Poles have any naval bases outside Europe I doubt it. I don't know if Britain has any in the South East of Asia but I doubt it too.

That logic means that if a ferry sinks in the English Channel then China definitely isn't a superpower if it didn't help the salvage mission.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:44 am

Keyboard Warriors wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Compared to Italy? Yeh, we're paying our way. Bitching that we can no longer afford to pay for your defence is just arrogance. Now we're simply paying for our own.
The British and French are paying for the defence of europe so you can all enjoy higher standards of living. We defended you so you could rebuild your shit economies over a period of 50/100 years.
That process is over, and now we expect you to start paying for your defence too.

So where the hell are you getting Poland out of all this?



Poland actually pays nearly 2% of it's GDP to the military. That's an appropriate amount. The UK pays 2.5 because we're picking up the slack of nations like Italy, who pay 1.7
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:44 am

Norstal wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Yes. Partially because of Neoliberal Fantasy land economics and the bountiful amount of americans running around shrieking "MUH CAPITALISM."

Anyone living in the U.S would know that those kind of extremists only live in God Knows Where. Most states like California is pretty much working on a socialist model.

Risottia wrote:Yup, I totally see Britain and Poland paying for their two carriers each. Oh wait...

The U.K and Poland are such emerging superpowers that they were the first responders when the Malaysian airplane went down...

Bahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha

God, even fucking China went ahead first.

Lies and slander! Everyone knows the Royal Navy is the best and it could totally beat everyone!

ruuuule britannia!
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:46 am

One of the major freeloaders is spain, which pays 0.85% to defence. Ireland pays 0.5.


basically, a lot of europe are freeloading and expecting the US and UK/France/Poland to pay for their defence. For that reason, I support an E.U army to force them to actually pay for their own defence.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:47 am, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:46 am

Greater-London wrote:
Norstal wrote:The U.K and Poland are such emerging superpowers that they were the first responders when the Malaysian airplane went down...

Bahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha

God, even fucking China went ahead first.


Well to be fair Malaysia is quite near to China... I don't know if the Poles have any naval bases outside Europe I doubt it. I don't know if Britain has any in the South East of Asia but I doubt it too.

That logic means that if a ferry sinks in the English Channel then China definitely isn't a superpower if it didn't help the salvage mission.

That is the point. That is exactly the point of a superpower. The U.S can deploy anywhere at a moment's notice.

Do you people even know what superpower means? It's not about having just the biggest penis. It's also about being able to hit everyone with your big penis. Because if you're just sitting on your ass not doing anything with your big penis, you might as well be like the other guy who has a small penis.
Last edited by Norstal on Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:48 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Risottia wrote:Yup, I totally see Britain and Poland paying for their two carriers each. Oh wait...


Compared to Italy? Yeh, we're paying our way. Bitching that we can no longer afford to pay for your defence is just arrogance. Now we're simply paying for our own.
The British and French are paying for the defence of europe so you can all enjoy higher standards of living. We defended you so you could rebuild your shit economies over a period of 50/100 years.
That process is over, and now we expect you to start paying for your defence too.

Italy has a navy with two aircraft carriers, 3 assault ships and 15 combat ships. It could take on the Royal Navy.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Keyboard Warriors
Minister
 
Posts: 3306
Founded: Mar 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Keyboard Warriors » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:48 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Keyboard Warriors wrote:So where the hell are you getting Poland out of all this?



Poland actually pays nearly 2% of it's GDP to the military. That's an appropriate amount. The UK pays 2.5 because we're picking up the slack of nations like Italy, who pay 1.7

The UK pays 2.5% because they're determined to maintain a strategic power projection force. Italy pays 1.7% because it has little involvement overseas and it's entire military is structured around repelling a Russian advance. There is no appropriate amount to spend on defence. Europe is more than adequately defended and, for the record, Italy contributes twice as much to that than Poland.
Yes.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:49 am

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Compared to Italy? Yeh, we're paying our way. Bitching that we can no longer afford to pay for your defence is just arrogance. Now we're simply paying for our own.
The British and French are paying for the defence of europe so you can all enjoy higher standards of living. We defended you so you could rebuild your shit economies over a period of 50/100 years.
That process is over, and now we expect you to start paying for your defence too.

Italy has a navy with two aircraft carriers, 3 assault ships and 15 combat ships. It could take on the Royal Navy.


It's not a blue water navy. It's functionally pointless in terms of defending europe and it's interest. (Except from Russia. Maybe.)
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:50 am

Keyboard Warriors wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:

Poland actually pays nearly 2% of it's GDP to the military. That's an appropriate amount. The UK pays 2.5 because we're picking up the slack of nations like Italy, who pay 1.7

The UK pays 2.5% because they're determined to maintain a strategic power projection force. Italy pays 1.7% because it has little involvement overseas and it's entire military is structured around repelling a Russian advance. There is no appropriate amount to spend on defence. Europe is more than adequately defended and, for the record, Italy contributes twice as much to that than Poland.


We need a strategic power projection force. The alternative is to allow genocides and hostile expansion elsewhere in the globe.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Dejanic
Senator
 
Posts: 4677
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Dejanic » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:50 am

Keyboard Warriors wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:

Poland actually pays nearly 2% of it's GDP to the military. That's an appropriate amount. The UK pays 2.5 because we're picking up the slack of nations like Italy, who pay 1.7

The UK pays 2.5% because they're determined to maintain a strategic power projection force. Italy pays 1.7% because it has little involvement overseas and it's entire military is structured around repelling a Russian advance. There is no appropriate amount to spend on defence. Europe is more than adequately defended and, for the record, Italy contributes twice as much to that than Poland.

Say what? I don't think Italy are afraid of a Russian advance, do you mean Poland?

User avatar
Keyboard Warriors
Minister
 
Posts: 3306
Founded: Mar 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Keyboard Warriors » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:51 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Matthew Islands wrote:Italy has a navy with two aircraft carriers, 3 assault ships and 15 combat ships. It could take on the Royal Navy.


It's not a blue water navy. It's functionally pointless in terms of defending europe and it's interest.

Do you actually know anything of what you're talking about?

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Keyboard Warriors wrote:The UK pays 2.5% because they're determined to maintain a strategic power projection force. Italy pays 1.7% because it has little involvement overseas and it's entire military is structured around repelling a Russian advance. There is no appropriate amount to spend on defence. Europe is more than adequately defended and, for the record, Italy contributes twice as much to that than Poland.


We need a strategic power projection force. The alternative is to allow genocides and hostile expansion elsewhere in the globe.

And we have one.
Yes.

User avatar
Keyboard Warriors
Minister
 
Posts: 3306
Founded: Mar 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Keyboard Warriors » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:52 am

Dejanic wrote:
Keyboard Warriors wrote:The UK pays 2.5% because they're determined to maintain a strategic power projection force. Italy pays 1.7% because it has little involvement overseas and it's entire military is structured around repelling a Russian advance. There is no appropriate amount to spend on defence. Europe is more than adequately defended and, for the record, Italy contributes twice as much to that than Poland.

Say what? I don't think Italy are afraid of a Russian advance, do you mean Poland?

Italy's military is still very much a relic of the cold war when yes, it was structured around defending from a Russian advance just like every other country in western Europe was at the time.
Yes.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bovad, Hurdergaryp, Keltionialang, Kreushia, Likhinia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Plan Neonie, Repreteop, Singaporen Empire, Stellar Colonies, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan, Washington Resistance Army, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads