Ah yes. Lots of lines were damaged as far as I have heard.
Advertisement
by Vedria » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:23 pm
by Neo Philippine Empire » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:31 am
by Emilio Aguinaldo » Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:06 pm
Neo Philippine Empire wrote:Just simple rain here in Lapu- Lapu
Emilio Aguinaldo wrote:Grab your gun, point it at bad guy, pull trigger.
by Gristol-Serkonos » Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:15 pm
by Mundiferrum » Tue Jul 22, 2014 10:10 pm
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:I have lived in the Philippines for most of my childhood. Everything seemed so sheltered, everything was good... until I moved to Canada.
Now as someone who's looking in from the outside, serious changes needs to be done.
by Vedria » Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:20 am
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:I have lived in the Philippines for most of my childhood. Everything seemed so sheltered, everything was good... until I moved to Canada.
Now as someone who's looking in from the outside, serious changes needs to be done.
The protectionist clauses in the 1987 Philippine Constitution is a good place to start.
by Gristol-Serkonos » Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:58 am
Vedria wrote:Gristol-Serkonos wrote:I have lived in the Philippines for most of my childhood. Everything seemed so sheltered, everything was good... until I moved to Canada.
Now as someone who's looking in from the outside, serious changes needs to be done.
The protectionist clauses in the 1987 Philippine Constitution is a good place to start.
Sheltered?
Wat.
by Vedria » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:03 am
by Mundiferrum » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:09 am
by Vedria » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:20 am
by Emilio Aguinaldo » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:23 am
Emilio Aguinaldo wrote:Grab your gun, point it at bad guy, pull trigger.
by Vedria » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:26 am
by Asigna » Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:14 am
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:I have lived in the Philippines for most of my childhood. Everything seemed so sheltered, everything was good... until I moved to Canada.
Now as someone who's looking in from the outside, serious changes needs to be done.
The protectionist clauses in the 1987 Philippine Constitution is a good place to start.
by Nationalist Eminral Republic » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:00 pm
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:I have lived in the Philippines for most of my childhood. Everything seemed so sheltered, everything was good... until I moved to Canada.
Now as someone who's looking in from the outside, serious changes needs to be done.
The protectionist clauses in the 1987 Philippine Constitution is a good place to start.
Federation of Eminral Republic|Pederasyon ng Republika ng Eminral
エミンラル共和連邦 | Federación de la República Eminral
by Mundiferrum » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:16 pm
Nationalist Eminral Republic wrote:Still, we need to open up our country to businesses, but ensure we maintain and protect our strong banking regulations.
by Lalaki » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:19 pm
Mundiferrum wrote:Nationalist Eminral Republic wrote:Still, we need to open up our country to businesses, but ensure we maintain and protect our strong banking regulations.
I dunno, that will help us with foreign investment, but the trickle-down thing doesn't actually work here. You know, even though we're improving in our economic ratings (and all that), prices are still going up, and wages going down. We have more fundamental problems than constitutional regulation of foreign investment (like, say, Presidents ignoring our constitution outright )
by Mundiferrum » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:22 pm
Lalaki wrote:Mundiferrum wrote:
I dunno, that will help us with foreign investment, but the trickle-down thing doesn't actually work here. You know, even though we're improving in our economic ratings (and all that), prices are still going up, and wages going down. We have more fundamental problems than constitutional regulation of foreign investment (like, say, Presidents ignoring our constitution outright )
Trickle-down doesn't work anywhere. Speaking as an American.
by Lalaki » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:24 pm
by Mundiferrum » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:30 pm
Lalaki wrote:Mundiferrum wrote:Libertarian Socialist revolution for ever! We shouldn't be like them capitalist pigs, we should all be living in small, anarcho-syndicalist communes, and all that Noam Chomsky nonsense!
*jumps off cliff*
Uh...I'm actually in favor of mixed market capitalism with a strong welfare state.
Similar to what you'll see in the EU.
by Quirina » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:41 pm
Gristol-Serkonos wrote:I have lived in the Philippines for most of my childhood. Everything seemed so sheltered, everything was good... until I moved to Canada.
Now as someone who's looking in from the outside, serious changes needs to be done.
The protectionist clauses in the 1987 Philippine Constitution is a good place to start.
by Vedria » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:28 am
Lalaki wrote:Mundiferrum wrote:Libertarian Socialist revolution for ever! We shouldn't be like them capitalist pigs, we should all be living in small, anarcho-syndicalist communes, and all that Noam Chomsky nonsense!
*jumps off cliff*
Uh...I'm actually in favor of mixed market capitalism with a strong welfare state.
Similar to what you'll see in the EU.
But again, I'm speaking as an American. I'm not sure the system would be compatible in the Philippines.
by Nationalist Eminral Republic » Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:56 pm
Mundiferrum wrote:Nationalist Eminral Republic wrote:Still, we need to open up our country to businesses, but ensure we maintain and protect our strong banking regulations.
I dunno, that will help us with foreign investment, but the trickle-down thing doesn't actually work here. You know, even though we're improving in our economic ratings (and all that), prices are still going up, and wages going down. We have more fundamental problems than constitutional regulation of foreign investment (like, say, Presidents ignoring our constitution outright )
Lalaki wrote:
Trickle-down doesn't work anywhere. Speaking as an American.
Lalaki wrote:Mundiferrum wrote:Libertarian Socialist revolution for ever! We shouldn't be like them capitalist pigs, we should all be living in small, anarcho-syndicalist communes, and all that Noam Chomsky nonsense!
*jumps off cliff*
Uh...I'm actually in favor of mixed market capitalism with a strong welfare state.
Similar to what you'll see in the EU.
But again, I'm speaking as an American. I'm not sure the system would be compatible in the Philippines.
Federation of Eminral Republic|Pederasyon ng Republika ng Eminral
エミンラル共和連邦 | Federación de la República Eminral
by Quirina » Fri Jul 25, 2014 10:15 pm
by Emilio Aguinaldo » Fri Jul 25, 2014 11:08 pm
Quirina wrote:And the reason why our country has few job opportunities is the protectionist Constitution we have. Removing such provisions will enable foreign investment to enter more, instead of having a burden on 60/40 foreign ownership.
Emilio Aguinaldo wrote:Grab your gun, point it at bad guy, pull trigger.
by Benshir » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:46 am
Emilio Aguinaldo wrote:So a parity rights that includes all foreigners?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anarcopia, Big Eyed Animation, Captain Vulgar, Emotional Support Crocodile
Advertisement