Dilange wrote:Cool. I guess?
No, not cool at all. Seriously, Ukraine? Lord.
Advertisement
by Blekksprutia » Sat Jun 01, 2013 2:05 pm
Dilange wrote:Cool. I guess?
by Blekksprutia » Sat Jun 01, 2013 2:26 pm
by Disserbia » Sat Jun 01, 2013 2:39 pm
by Shofercia » Sat Jun 01, 2013 5:06 pm
Brocwika wrote:Soldier of Fortune, mercenary, contract killer, whatever man, all comes down to the same thing, a warrior for hire. And of course they come from everywhere, Arabs like the Eastern European ones though.
And I know how WW1 started, but the reason Russia allied itself with Serbia, was because it was another Eastern Orthodox nation.
by Brocwika » Sun Jun 02, 2013 11:51 am
by Rio Cana » Sun Jun 02, 2013 12:04 pm
by Shofercia » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:21 pm
Rio Cana wrote:Brocwika wrote:
Nah, it's a just a more eastern, radioactive Poland, with less catholics.
It turns out that Belarus to the North got more contamination then Ukraine. Around 23% of Belarus is contaminated. The Ukrainian based nuclear power plant was near there southern border. Could explain why Belarus is building there own nuclear plant near there Northern border with Lithuania. Found out Kaliningrad is doing the same but on there eastern border with Lithuania.
by Byzantium Imperial » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:24 pm
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:25 pm
Densaner wrote:I posted on the other thread. But it just shows how fucked up the whole Syrian situation is.
Anyone advocating intervention in that vortex needs psychiatric help.
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:26 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:Why does the ukranians care about syria exactly?
by Shofercia » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:26 pm
Byzantium Imperial wrote:Why does the ukranians care about syria exactly?
Shofercia wrote:Referring to poor living conditions of veterans in the country, namely “the lack of housing”, the former officer says that due to this situation, veterans can offer their skills to Syria in it’s efforts to restore constitutional order.
Recognising the fact that Syrian law does not allow foreigners to join the national armed forces, Razumovsky said Syria could give citizenship status to the volunteers, provide insurance to the volunteer’s families to help with the purchase of property after the war.
by Byzantium Imperial » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:27 pm
by Shofercia » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:29 pm
by Shofercia » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:29 pm
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:32 pm
Shofercia wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
But Western imperialism... and... and... Russia supporting the people loving Assad regime!
Still doesn't justify interventionism. These are volunteers going. The Russian Taxpayers, and/or Ukrainian Taxpayers, aren't paying for the intervention. It won't mean that Russia will get bogged down in the Middle East. Etc, etc, etc.
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:34 pm
by Volnotova » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:35 pm
Brocwika wrote:Russian and Ukranian volunteers.
AKA "mercenaries"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18321748
Middle Eastern dictators have a habit of calling on the help of Eastern European contracted killers.
by Shofercia » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:37 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Shofercia wrote:
Still doesn't justify interventionism. These are volunteers going. The Russian Taxpayers, and/or Ukrainian Taxpayers, aren't paying for the intervention. It won't mean that Russia will get bogged down in the Middle East. Etc, etc, etc.
I don't disagree, I think it's rather pitiful though that people are critiquing the US and Europe for daring to think about intervention, whether it be troops on the ground or sending weapons, as the Russians are sending arms to Assad and only worsening the situation even more.
by Shofercia » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:38 pm
by New Octopucta » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:38 pm
by Prizea » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:39 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Shofercia wrote:
Still doesn't justify interventionism. These are volunteers going. The Russian Taxpayers, and/or Ukrainian Taxpayers, aren't paying for the intervention. It won't mean that Russia will get bogged down in the Middle East. Etc, etc, etc.
I don't disagree, I think it's rather pitiful though that people are critiquing the US and Europe for daring to think about intervention, whether it be troops on the ground or sending weapons, as the Russians are sending arms to Assad and only worsening the situation even more.
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:40 pm
Shofercia wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
I don't disagree, I think it's rather pitiful though that people are critiquing the US and Europe for daring to think about intervention, whether it be troops on the ground or sending weapons, as the Russians are sending arms to Assad and only worsening the situation even more.
You can think whatever you want. But when thoughts turn into posts, I get to criticize them. Additionally, the Russian Taxpayers aren't paying for the weapons. Whereas, I'm still waiting for the Iraqi War to pay for itself, as was promised, and I doubt that I'll ever get that taxpayer money back.
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:42 pm
Prizea wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
I don't disagree, I think it's rather pitiful though that people are critiquing the US and Europe for daring to think about intervention, whether it be troops on the ground or sending weapons, as the Russians are sending arms to Assad and only worsening the situation even more.
The trouble with the US intervening is that they often mess it up. It could very easily end up as a new Afghanistan, with US weapons being provided as a counter to the Russians and later being used to fight the US as well.
I think the EU countries should intervene though, in particular France.
by Prizea » Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:44 pm
Volnotova wrote:Brocwika wrote:Russian and Ukranian volunteers.
AKA "mercenaries"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18321748
Middle Eastern dictators have a habit of calling on the help of Eastern European contracted killers.
Libya is in the Middle East now?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Philjia, Picairn, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement