Yes, but if you eat the heart of someone, you're eating the heart of everyone they've ever eaten the heart of.
Advertisement
by The Emerald Dawn » Tue May 14, 2013 2:30 pm
by Eastern Slavia » Tue May 14, 2013 2:40 pm
by Byzantium Imperial » Tue May 14, 2013 3:03 pm
by The Marxist State » Tue May 14, 2013 3:11 pm
Shofercia wrote:I'm guessing that he was heartless, and needed a heart to consume. On a more serious note, I'm concerned that thugs like him are in prominent leadership positions.
by Quebec and Atlantic Canada » Tue May 14, 2013 3:25 pm
by Shofercia » Tue May 14, 2013 3:40 pm
The Marxist State wrote:Shofercia wrote:I'm guessing that he was heartless, and needed a heart to consume. On a more serious note, I'm concerned that thugs like him are in prominent leadership positions.
The article said he was a well-known insurgent. Not part of the Revolutionary Council or in any other position of power. While this doesn't excuse what he did, you generally don't get to be a well-known soldier because you're a nice guy.
"Abu Sakkar is a very significant commander - he's in charge of one of the most important battles happening in Syria right now," said Mr Bouckaert. "The danger is that extremists on both sides will feel the need to respond in kind."
More info and full story here
by Trollgaard » Tue May 14, 2013 3:58 pm
by Blekksprutia » Tue May 14, 2013 4:00 pm
by Al-Faisal » Tue May 14, 2013 4:05 pm
Densaner wrote:Yeah let's all back the rebels!
Second thoughts...let's all stay the hell away from Syria, forever!
by Temujinn » Tue May 14, 2013 4:23 pm
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.
by Kazarogkai » Tue May 14, 2013 4:30 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Mirage wrote:Meh, i don't see anything wrong with that. The person is dead, who cares what happens to the body (ok, maybe the relatives). But i consider the killing to be the problem, not what happens to a dead body.
Regardless, hearts are tasty.
Desecration of an enemy combatant's body post-mortem is a war crime, and should be prosecuted as such.
Gathering trophies, mutilating the bodies, using them as "warnings" or booby-trapping them. All war crimes.
by The Emerald Dawn » Tue May 14, 2013 4:34 pm
Kazarogkai wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:Desecration of an enemy combatant's body post-mortem is a war crime, and should be prosecuted as such.
Gathering trophies, mutilating the bodies, using them as "warnings" or booby-trapping them. All war crimes.
I see that as just being very smart, not a terrible crime. War is war, all us fair in love and war. Its a dead body for petes sake what happens to it shouldn't really matter.
by Pope Joan » Tue May 14, 2013 5:11 pm
by Costa Alegria » Tue May 14, 2013 5:14 pm
Ifreann wrote:How else will he gain his enemy's strength?
Pope Joan wrote:These so called rebels (mercenary "insurgents") are tools of Israel and Saudi Arabia, whose arms they bear.
And whose chemical weapons they use.
Fool.
by Pope Joan » Tue May 14, 2013 5:18 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:Ifreann wrote:How else will he gain his enemy's strength?
Power-ups.
In saying that, the fuck? This is certainly worse than Syrian special forces eating live snakes to prove their toughness.Pope Joan wrote:These so called rebels (mercenary "insurgents") are tools of Israel and Saudi Arabia, whose arms they bear.
Hurr, it's those evil Jews again.And whose chemical weapons they use.
Neither country has chemical weapons.Fool.
Yup. The mirror certainly is damning isn't it?
by Costa Alegria » Tue May 14, 2013 5:26 pm
Pope Joan wrote:One nation in the mideast is known to possess sarin; Israel. No other dupply connection can be proved.
The so called rebels are largely Al Qaeda, and we have known it for a long time.
Yet they bear arms of Saudi and Israeli manufacture.
Pressure is great to draw the US into further involvement; why? To create another Libya? Can't we learn from even our most recentmistakesdeliberately wrongheaded policies?
by Esparmuran » Tue May 14, 2013 5:33 pm
by Temujinn » Tue May 14, 2013 5:33 pm
Pope Joan wrote:These so called rebels (mercenary "insurgents") are tools of Israel and Saudi Arabia, whose arms they bear.
And whose chemical weapons they use.
Did we not learn about these beasts from the atrocities of Aleppo?
Or were we so brainwashed that we believed these depredations were somehow unleashed against Assad's most staunch allies, the Christians?
Fools.
Worse than fools, we knew all the time what we were supporting.
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Ineva, Jolthig, Keltionialang, Kostane, Kyrusia, New Temecula, Rusrunia, Varsemia
Advertisement