Valentine Vote for Same-Sex Marriage

[Duvniask]

I am personally disgusted by the thought of same-sex marriage opponents being allowed in any states, especially one that is so close to mine (any). As a human, I strongly oppose this, and hope that we eject them into space.

That is clearly a liberal position. No morals.

Not being a bigot =/= no morals.

[Wisconsin9]

This is why it is superior. Those who cannot engage in vaginal intercourse should not be recognized as married.

Source?

His personal preference.

[Christian Democrats]

If marriage is about the benefits, why are domestic partnerships with the same benefits not acceptable?

Because separate but equal got ruled unconstitutional.

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

[Sdaeriji]

It bothers me that instead of respecting each others opinions, we would prefer to be rude to those who don't support gay marriage in Illinois. What was this thread called? Surely not 'be rude to people with other opinions. I just want to say that I am a heterosexual and believe that everyone deserves their own opinion.

Opinions are not inherently worthy of respect.

[Neo Art]

Because separate but equal got ruled unconstitutional.

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

You're really really really obsessed with pussy

[The Emerald Dawn]

I am personally disgusted by the thought of same-sex marriage opponents being allowed in any states, especially one that is so close to mine (any). As a human, I strongly oppose this, and hope that we eject them into space.

That is clearly a liberal position. No morals.

That is clearly a retarded position. No sense.

[The Emerald Dawn]

Because separate but equal got ruled unconstitutional.

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

Right, so you're a supremacist? You're like, the Grand Wizard of the VVV?

[Duvniask]

Because separate but equal got ruled unconstitutional.

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

[Old Sarthal]

Because separate but equal got ruled unconstitutional.

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

Aha! I see. You believe if we legalize same-sex marriage, humans will die out, because no one will have children. Am I correct?

[Mavorpen]

They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

Let me try this.

Vaginal intercourse is inferior because it continues the human species, the greatest threat to biodiversity today. Therefore, in the grand scheme of things, vaginal intercourse is undesirable. Prove me wrong.

[Johto and Kanto]

It bothers me that instead of respecting each others opinions, we would prefer to be rude to those who don't support gay marriage in Illinois. What was this thread called? Surely not 'be rude to people with other opinions. I just want to say that I am a heterosexual and believe that everyone deserves their own opinion.

Opinions are not inherently worthy of respect.

Why are they not? I notice that although Christian Democrats IS a bit annoying, you should accept the people who simply state their opinion

[Manahakatouki]

Aren't we all hoity toity with our big fancy words from books.

I was gonna go with fuckin'

Yes, people marry so that they can express their deep romantic love for one another through the marital act. People marry to engage in sexual intercourse and to live the remainder of their lives with that partner. Sexual intercourse leads to procreation.

"By its very nature the institution of marriage and married love is ordered to the procreation and education of the offspring and it is in them that it finds its crowning glory."

People who cannot engage in these procreative acts cannot be married. Sexual intercourse -- that is, vaginal intercourse -- exceeds all other forms of sexual activity because it is the only sort of sexual act that can result in children.

This is why same-sex partners cannot be married. They engage in inferior forms of sexual activity, acts that never result in procreation. Vaginal intercourse, the only form of procreative sexual activity, deserves special recognition in our society; and this is why only a man and a woman should be recognized as married. Only they have vaginal intercourse; only their sex can produce children.

Throughout reading your argument, I knew you were just hoping for this...

But that's just silly, as "vaginal intercourse exceeds all other forms of sexual activity"? Pardon my french, but bullshit, honestly...

[The Emerald Dawn]

YOU FUCKING PIG. GOD YOU DISGUST ME.

HOW CAN YOU MENTION THIS HORRIBLE ACT?!

OH GOD I'M PUKING.

Damnit



I forgot to capitalise that one "of"

God man, how can you fail the team like that? Seriously? We ask you to bump it up, and you just LAUNCH it into the fourth row.

[Christian Democrats]

Without vaginal intercourse, the human species would not exist.

This is why it is superior. Those who cannot engage in vaginal intercourse should not be recognized as married.

You're right, we would have ceased to exist long ago if it weren't for vaginal intercourse. Except now that there are other ways of impregnating women and reproducing, there's no need to keep it.

Children deserve to be the products of acts of love. No child should be produced in a petri dish.

[Tlaceceyaya]

Opinions are not inherently worthy of respect.

Why are they not? I notice that although Christian Democrats IS a bit annoying, you should accept the people who simply state their opinion

Why are they? Why should someone's views on something be automatically respected?

[Wisconsin9]

Because separate but equal got ruled unconstitutional.

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

You are basing your "argument" entirely on your opinion. You then assume that we respect or fear you enough to adopt your opinion as our own. You have not backed up this argument with anything except sound bytes that wouldn't be out of place in Germany during the late 30s.

[Frisivisia]

Because separate but equal got ruled unconstitutional.

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

Two words:

In vitro.

[Saruhan]

Because separate but equal got ruled unconstitutional.

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

Ah yeah. Perhaps with should also encourage these sorts things, if they're so "pure"

[The Emerald Dawn]

You're right, we would have ceased to exist long ago if it weren't for vaginal intercourse. Except now that there are other ways of impregnating women and reproducing, there's no need to keep it.

Children deserve to be the products of acts of love. No child should be produced in a petri dish.

Children don't deserve to be born to a mother who's sperm-donor left because she was an easy lay.

[Duvniask]

Opinions are not inherently worthy of respect.

Why are they not? I notice that although Christian Democrats IS a bit annoying, you should accept the people who simply state their opinion

Respect should be earned, not just given for no reason.

Many nazis "just" state their opinion.

[Johto and Kanto]

They are not equal. Opposite-sex relationships are superior. They alone involve vaginal intercourse, which is the only kind of sexual activity that can lead to the creation of children, something that is necessary if our society is going to continue into the future.

One relationship is superior; one relationship is inferior.

All individuals are equal, but not all relationships are equal.

You are basing your "argument" entirely on your opinion. You then assume that we respect or fear you enough to adopt your opinion as our own. You have not backed up this argument with anything except sound bytes that wouldn't be out of place in Germany during the late 30s.

Ah, genius, comparing not allowing same-sex marriage to nazis.

[Saruhan]

You're right, we would have ceased to exist long ago if it weren't for vaginal intercourse. Except now that there are other ways of impregnating women and reproducing, there's no need to keep it.

Children deserve to be the products of acts of love. No child should be produced in a petri dish.

The fact that WE FUCKING BECAME GOD AND FLIPPED THE BIRD OFF TO NATURE IN THE PROCESS isn't loving at all?

[The Emerald Dawn]

You are basing your "argument" entirely on your opinion. You then assume that we respect or fear you enough to adopt your opinion as our own. You have not backed up this argument with anything except sound bytes that wouldn't be out of place in Germany during the late 30s.

Ah, genius, comparing not allowing same-sex marriage to nazis.

Can you think of another regime famous for attempts at eugenics that was implemented on a global scale?

[Sdaeriji]

Opinions are not inherently worthy of respect.

Why are they not? I notice that although Christian Democrats IS a bit annoying, you should accept the people who simply state their opinion

Why should I accept the people who simply state their opinion?

[Wisconsin9]

You're right, we would have ceased to exist long ago if it weren't for vaginal intercourse. Except now that there are other ways of impregnating women and reproducing, there's no need to keep it.

Children deserve to be the products of acts of love. No child should be produced in a petri dish.

So you're now saying that homosexuals are incapable of love.