Advertisement
by Czechanada » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:50 am
by Necrophilopolis » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:50 am
Aggicificicerous wrote:Necrophilopolis wrote:Since it's taxpayer money the taxpayers should vote on it.
*You're also overlooking the economic-right argument as well
If taxpayers voted on every single use of their money, all their money would go into referenda and the government would have nothing left over to actually accomplish anything.
In regards to the original question, yes. In fact, my old high school did hand out free condoms courtesy of a local safe-sex group.
by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:50 am
by Smartass alcoholics » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:51 am
Zack Mattox wrote:Alaje wrote:
I don't support encouraging students to have sex, and that is exactly what putting condoms in the schools would do. If they want condoms, they should buy them at a store.
and what if they are to embarased to? if they have easy acsess from people they know and trust then it would save everyone alot of hassle and regret
by Souseiseki » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:51 am
Czechanada wrote:No. They should be distibuting hijabs.
by Galloism » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:52 am
Raeyh wrote:High school students are underage and can not have sex legally. Providing condoms to people who are under the age of consent would be contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:52 am
Necrophilopolis wrote:Aggicificicerous wrote:
If taxpayers voted on every single use of their money, all their money would go into referenda and the government would have nothing left over to actually accomplish anything.
In regards to the original question, yes. In fact, my old high school did hand out free condoms courtesy of a local safe-sex group.
The argument is too long because I think at least 99.999% of all taxes are theft.
by Zack Mattox » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:53 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Samuraikoku wrote:
Battle-Brother!
Keep it safe, Brothers!
As to those who say that schools shouldn't "promote sexual activity" I'm going to go ahead and assume your households don't have:
TV
Internet
Hand Held Video Games
Bibles
Magazines
Music
Crisco
Apple Pie
Hands
doorknobs
shampoo bottles
vegetables
cars
indoor plumbing
etc.
by Khadgar » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:53 am
Galloism wrote:Raeyh wrote:High school students are underage and can not have sex legally. Providing condoms to people who are under the age of consent would be contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
Umm...
In most states, high school students can have sex legally. Most states have an age of consent of 16-18, and close in age exemptions before that down to 13-14.
So, high school students, in most states, can have sex legally.
by Raeyh » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:53 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Raeyh wrote:High school students are underage and can not have sex legally. Providing condoms to people who are under the age of consent would be contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
16 is the age of consent here.
And there are R+J laws allowing consent between people under the age of consent provided there isn't much difference between the ages. (Same in a lot of US states.)
by Aggicificicerous » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:54 am
Necrophilopolis wrote:Aggicificicerous wrote:
If taxpayers voted on every single use of their money, all their money would go into referenda and the government would have nothing left over to actually accomplish anything.
In regards to the original question, yes. In fact, my old high school did hand out free condoms courtesy of a local safe-sex group.
The argument is too long because I think at least 99.999% of all taxes are theft.
by Necrophilopolis » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:54 am
by Smartass alcoholics » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:54 am
Galloism wrote:Raeyh wrote:High school students are underage and can not have sex legally. Providing condoms to people who are under the age of consent would be contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
Umm...
In most states, high school students can have sex legally. Most states have an age of consent of 16-18, and close in age exemptions before that down to 13-14.
So, high school students, in most states, can have sex legally.
by Souseiseki » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:54 am
Necrophilopolis wrote:Aggicificicerous wrote:
If taxpayers voted on every single use of their money, all their money would go into referenda and the government would have nothing left over to actually accomplish anything.
In regards to the original question, yes. In fact, my old high school did hand out free condoms courtesy of a local safe-sex group.
The argument is too long because I think at least 99.999% of all taxes are theft.
by West Angola » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:55 am
by Smartass alcoholics » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:55 am
Zack Mattox wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:Keep it safe, Brothers!
As to those who say that schools shouldn't "promote sexual activity" I'm going to go ahead and assume your households don't have:
TV
Internet
Hand Held Video Games
Bibles
Magazines
Music
Crisco
Apple Pie
Hands
doorknobs
shampoo bottles
vegetables
cars
indoor plumbing
etc.
yummy apple pie... makes me want to have sex.........?
by Necrophilopolis » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:55 am
In this case, the tax money has already been collected. Complaining about taxes being theft is neither useful nor worthwhile.
by Chaarn » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:56 am
by Alaje » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:56 am
Zack Mattox wrote:Alaje wrote:
I don't support encouraging students to have sex, and that is exactly what putting condoms in the schools would do. If they want condoms, they should buy them at a store.
and what if they are to embarased to? if they have easy acsess from people they know and trust then it would save everyone alot of hassle and regret
Khadgar wrote:Alaje wrote:
I don't support encouraging students to have sex, and that is exactly what putting condoms in the schools would do. If they want condoms, they should buy them at a store.
Hi, this claim is demonstrably wrong. You should stop making it.OBJECTIVES: This study examines the impact of the condom availability program in New York City public high schools by comparing rates of sexual activity and condom use for New York students and similar students in Chicago. METHODS: A total of 7119 students from 12 randomly selected New York schools and 5738 students from 10 Chicago schools participated in a cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: New York students, compared with Chicago students, reported equal rates of sexual activity but higher rates of condom use at last intercourse (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36). For higher-risk students (those with three or more sexual partners in the past 6 months), condom use was greater in New York (OR = 1.85) than in Chicago. CONCLUSIONS: Condom availability has a modest but significant effect on condom use and does not increase rates of sexual activity. These findings suggest that school-based condom availability can lower the risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases for urban teenagers in the United States.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380965/
In short, teenagers fuck regardless, offering condoms increases condom usage, not sexual activity. Feel free to stop making your erroneous claim.
by Czechanada » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:56 am
Zack Mattox wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:Keep it safe, Brothers!
As to those who say that schools shouldn't "promote sexual activity" I'm going to go ahead and assume your households don't have:
TV
Internet
Hand Held Video Games
Bibles
Magazines
Music
Crisco
Apple Pie
Hands
doorknobs
shampoo bottles
vegetables
cars
indoor plumbing
etc.
yummy apple pie... makes me want to have sex.........?
by Smartass alcoholics » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:56 am
Chaarn wrote:It's not the school's job.
by The Emerald Dawn » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:56 am
Zack Mattox wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:Keep it safe, Brothers!
As to those who say that schools shouldn't "promote sexual activity" I'm going to go ahead and assume your households don't have:
TV
Internet
Hand Held Video Games
Bibles
Magazines
Music
Crisco
Apple Pie
Hands
doorknobs
shampoo bottles
vegetables
cars
indoor plumbing
etc.
yummy apple pie... makes me want to have sex.........?
West Angola wrote:Isn't it sad that we are just resigned to the fact that teens will have sex? I blame the 60s...and 70s and 80s and 90s and 00s...
by Zack Mattox » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:57 am
by Mediterra » Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:57 am
Mois wrote:Seriously?
I cannot comprehend why people hate Islam so much. Yes, some Muslims caused 9/11, but that doesn't mean all of them are terrible people. I have met many kind Islamic people. I think everyone just needs to accept other religions, because there is no proven "better" religion. That goes for Jewish people, too.
Honestly, can we just act a little human for once?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Ineva, Infected Mushroom, Kostane, Likhinia, Nivosea, The Black Forrest, Tiami, Zantalio
Advertisement