Madda wrote:I know that it happened way less. If somebody called you a queer, you and your friends would just beat them up.
I'd love to see a source backing that up.
Advertisement
by The Nuclear Fist » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:01 pm
Madda wrote:I know that it happened way less. If somebody called you a queer, you and your friends would just beat them up.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by Samuraikoku » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:02 pm
Exogenous Imperium wrote:That only works if people are convinced that the dead cannot be punished.
by Ceannairceach » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:02 pm
Anglican Prussia wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:It is harassment to, you know, harass a child about their sexuality if it isn't public, and to hound them about their sinfullness and "illegality".
Homosexuality isn't illegal, by the way.
I agree, but now, most homosexuals in public high schools fell the need to tell everyone about their sexuality. If they are going to be public about their sex life, they have to have the fact that not everyone is going to agree with them because they "need" everyone's approval.
by Thanatttynia » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:02 pm
by Seperates » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:03 pm
by The Nuclear Fist » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:03 pm
Anglican Prussia wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:It is harassment to, you know, harass a child about their sexuality if it isn't public, and to hound them about their sinfullness and "illegality".
Homosexuality isn't illegal, by the way.
I agree, but now, most homosexuals in public high schools fell the need to tell everyone about their sexuality. If they are going to be public about their sex life, they have to have the fact that not everyone is going to agree with them because they "need" everyone's approval.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by Retro Lyra » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:03 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Retro Lyra wrote:So, does this mean that since I'm white and my boyfriend is spanish he's going to rob all my money from me, scream "Hasta la vista!", and drive off into the sunset in a stolen car? Good to know.
Any time now, Lyra. Any time. Watch your car keys.
And your weed stash.
And your bedroom door. Chances are, he'll rape you first, the Genocidal Bastard.
Equestrian States wrote:Retro Lyra is actually an all-female corporation of puppet-manufacturers.
by Anglican Prussia » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:03 pm
Avenio wrote:Anglican Prussia wrote:The thing is, why are they killing themselves?
Depression?Anglican Prussia wrote: Why can't they handle "mean" words?
I'm sure they can 'handle' 'mean' words in and of themselves, but systemic harassment is something that few people can withstand without developing a mental illness.
by Exogenous Imperium » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:04 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:I am, sadly, horrified to think that you believe that we should tolerate and/or encourage homophobic abuse in schools to try to "correct" homosexuality. I've been openly homosexual for 3 years and, yes, people have treated me as a second class citizen in some instances.
Other, more mature people, have credited me for not only having the strength to come out of the closet, but also to have the strength to talk about homosexuality and homophobia to the other year groups at my school.
The world isn't meant to be based on brutality, it's meant to be based on respect and kindness. I am concerned your personal feeling leach far too strongly into your roleplaying, Anglican Prussia. Homophobia is an awful, criminal thing and I will not associate myself with awful criminals.
by Ceannairceach » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:05 pm
Anglican Prussia wrote:Avenio wrote:
Depression?
I'm sure they can 'handle' 'mean' words in and of themselves, but systemic harassment is something that few people can withstand without developing a mental illness.
But is it harassment if there is classroom discussion on same-sex marriage and a student simply said "I personally believe marriage is only between one man and one women and my religion says homosexuality is a sin.", is that harassment?
by Anglican Prussia » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:05 pm
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:06 pm
by Williamson » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:06 pm
by Williamson » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:06 pm
by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:06 pm
Anglican Prussia wrote:Avenio wrote:
Depression?
I'm sure they can 'handle' 'mean' words in and of themselves, but systemic harassment is something that few people can withstand without developing a mental illness.
But is it harassment if there is classroom discussion on same-sex marriage and a student simply said "I personally believe marriage is only between one man and one women and my religion says homosexuality is a sin.", is that harassment?
by Ceannairceach » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:07 pm
Anglican Prussia wrote:I am sorry, but I must go now. I have a comparative essay due in my economics class on the Austrian School VS the Chicago School. Take care and God Bless All of You.
by Saruhan » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:07 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.
by Oterro » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:08 pm
by Seperates » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:08 pm
Anglican Prussia wrote:Seperates wrote:I'd say that the school was out-of-bounds on that action. So long as he does not activly harrass homosexual individuals there should be no problem. However, legal 'marriage' has nothing to do with the church and god, and more to do with governmental policy. Seperation of church and state, you know. So bringing up 'sin' is a non-sequitar.
No, it is not. Again, if homosexuals want to public about their sex life, they need to face the fact that not everyone that does not agree with homosexuality is not going to be silent.
by East Ormania » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:08 pm
by Greater Phenia » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:08 pm
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:09 pm
by St James puppet nation » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:09 pm
Anglican Prussia wrote:I have a confession to make; I was bullied when I was in grammar school, and I went to both state run and private schools during my time in grammar school. In both, I was bulled and the staff did little to nothing to stop it. I also grew up with homosexual attractions while I was in the private grammar school which was also a very conservative Roman Catholic School. But I survived and I am still very thankful for my Roman Catholic education for providing me an great education not only on the “ 3 R’S” but on moral values and ethics.
Now, I must say, at the time, the bullying seemed to have no real value. I was bullied because of me weight, of a tumor I had on right side of my cheek, a small pony tail that I used to have, of my learning disability and my alleged and actually true homosexual “crush” on another student, which was actually my first “crush.” But unlike today, I fought back. Well, I did not really fight anyone, I “ripped” on them back.
Today, I hardly talk to them and when I do, we just laugh at it. People mature and people move on. I strongly believe that a bully in his childhood is a bully in his/her adulthood. And if they are, they are most likely just passive-aggressive arses.
Without the bullying that I went through as a child and early teenager, I would not able to survive in adult world today. I had have supervisors that were just plain dicks, and guess what, I am still living. If you can’t handle grammar, middle and high school and the bullies that come with it, then I’m sorry, you are the problem, not the bully.
Currently, especially in the U.S, we seem to have an all of a sudden focus on children and teenagers that are homosexual. There are claims that we need to protect them from the bullies because if someone “harasses” based on their sexuality, they are “harmed” so how. That they need to be a protected class because…well I haven’t really heard a reason why from the advocate for it.
Firstly, I grew up homosexual in a Roman Catholic private school, I was told every day that people like myself was going to hell. In fact, my private school and parish went one step further and preached that even having homosexual attractions was a sin, let alone acting on them. So, I felt like crap and at times, I did want to kill myself. But guess what? I survived through the medicine.
Yes, I am saying that the bullying of homosexual teens is beneficial to them, because it will teach them how to fight back and that not everyone is going to accept homosexuality just because it is “the right and smart thing to do”. There is going to ignorant people out there and people are going to “cling to their religion”, deal with it. It will also teach them not to be ahem...overly expressive in professional environments.
Sorces: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes ... er-dislike
HTTP://WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK/NEWS/ARTICLE ... PULAR.HTML
HTTP://WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK/NEWS/ARTICLE ... XPERT.HTML
HTTP://THESTIR.CAFEMOM.COM/BIG_KID/1284 ... _LESSONS_A
by Ceannairceach » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:10 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Ethel mermania, Ineva, Pasong Tirad
Advertisement