NationStates

I think that a man marries with another man, is a wrong. Im too lazy to explain why right now, so I will proably come back next day to edit it. But I think Woman on Woman is just fine because they atleast can have babies (And its hot)

Draculesti Romania wrote:

Death Metal wrote:Oh, and not only should same-sex couples have marriage rights, polygamy should be legal too.

Yes, I am serious.

I hear you, man.

There is nothing wrong with polygamy, numerous socities past and present permitted it. Also it solves the "sin" of adultery.

Armageddon Steel Legion wrote:Also Neo.


THE EMPRAH LOVES YOU... But not the guy that made this thread.

My flag used to e a Nurgle symbol for a while. Careful where you point that thing.

Neo Art wrote:

Samuraikoku wrote:
Lady Commissar and I happen to coincide.

Really? Is that right? Then how come I've never seen the two of you in a room at the same time before?

We are in this thread right now.

Samuraikoku wrote:

Neo Art wrote:
You show up JUST after someone posted a WH40k image. Is that your "bloody mary" or something?

Lady Commissar and I happen to coincide.

If we want to get rid of AIDS, we just give these out. Also would Africa be a thread, since AIDs is quite common there too?

Shaun Branch wrote:There is no threat to even sugjest so is digusting. Some of the greatest civiliztions were bi such as Rome and Greece.

What the hell are you talking about?

Alagaisean empirial army wrote:

Condunum wrote:I think that's their mindset. Since they see them as deviants, they think that LGBT is going to do deviant things.

you are wrong homosexuality and christianity are both false

What? I didn't mention Christianity. And what are you saying?

Samuraikoku wrote:There is no threat.

(Image)

*resists urge to mention his impending doom*

Armageddon Steel Legion wrote:

Samuraikoku wrote:
Lady Commissar and I happen to coincide.

If we want to get rid of AIDS, we just give these out. Also would Africa be a thread, since AIDs is quite common there too?

http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs34/f/2008/300/c/8/The_Emperor_Protects_by_Gacopierz.jpg

No point arguing with this kind of users, Lady Commissar.

Although that might be because Nurgle decided to bless me today, so I'm sick.

Do NOT recruit me your region wrote:

Death Metal wrote:You know what?

I submit that without homosexuality, modern society would not exist.

Care to provide a source?

My source is history itself.

To wit: One can argue that, for better or for worse, Christianity has shaped modern civilization.

The Bible talks A LOT about homosexuality. Christ himself doesn't, mind you, but the Bible does. Without something to demonize, the bible becomes less effective.

Cleopatra is believed to be bisexual or possibly pansexual. Without Cleopatra's sexual nature, the entire course of ancient history would have drastically changed.

Sappho of Lesbos, yes that's a real person, was a lesbian and was a massive contributor to Greek literature.

Homosexuality was practiced often in Rome and Japan, to economic and social success. Thus there societies would suffer without.

Lawrence of Arabia is believed to be homosexual, and that the incompatibility with this was his reason for volunteering for duty in a region where he did not believe he would be persecuted. We may have well lost WWI without Lawrence of Arabia.

With different history comes a different present.

Death Metal wrote:You know what?

I submit that without homosexuality, modern society would not exist.

WTF, how do you come to that conclusion? Do you find something inherently good about homos? I'd like to hear what that'd be.

Ereria wrote:I think that a man marries with another man, is a wrong. Im too lazy to explain why right now, so I will proably come back next day to edit it. But I think Woman on Woman is just fine because they atleast can have babies (And its hot)

Talk about hypocrisy. Because you find female to female sex "hot" "is fine", but not male to male ? Pray tell, how do two females make a baby ?

Alaje wrote:

Death Metal wrote:You know what?

I submit that without homosexuality, modern society would not exist.

WTF, how do you come to that conclusion? Do you find something inherently good about homos? I'd like to hear what that'd be.

Perhaps he said it to show how preposterous the claim that they threaten society is.

Alaje wrote:

Death Metal wrote:You know what?

I submit that without homosexuality, modern society would not exist.

WTF, how do you come to that conclusion? Do you find something inherently good about homos? I'd like to hear what that'd be.

No more than something inherently bad, despite your opinion.

So, really, OP, your entire argument boils down to a correlation =/= causation fallacy and misdirected handwringing about sexual hygiene.

I have to say, it's not a very good cover for 'gays are icky'.

Alaje wrote:

Death Metal wrote:You know what?

I submit that without homosexuality, modern society would not exist.

WTF, how do you come to that conclusion? Do you find something inherently good about homos? I'd like to hear what that'd be.

Gays save us from terminal boringness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmKhPcFMTgo

Thaipursia wrote:

Ereria wrote:I think that a man marries with another man, is a wrong. Im too lazy to explain why right now, so I will proably come back next day to edit it. But I think Woman on Woman is just fine because they atleast can have babies (And its hot)

Talk about hypocrisy. Because you find female to female sex "hot" "is fine", but not male to male ? Pray tell, how do two females make a baby ?

Magic.

Alaje wrote:Do you find something inherently good about homos? I'd like to hear what that'd be.

They love each other. Love is inherently good. Therefore there is inherent good in homosexuality.

How is gay people having AIDS a threat to the non-gay community?

Alaje wrote:

Death Metal wrote:You know what?

I submit that without homosexuality, modern society would not exist.

WTF, how do you come to that conclusion? Do you find something inherently good about homos? I'd like to hear what that'd be.

Do you find something inherently good about not being homosexual?

Nationalist State of Knox wrote:

Thaipursia wrote:
Talk about hypocrisy. Because you find female to female sex "hot" "is fine", but not male to male ? Pray tell, how do two females make a baby ?

Magic.

Baby-making isn't magic.

Friendship is magic.

Pope Joan wrote:

Alaje wrote:
WTF, how do you come to that conclusion? Do you find something inherently good about homos? I'd like to hear what that'd be.

Gays save us from terminal boringness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmKhPcFMTgo

And bad fashion.

Re OP:

Thaipursia wrote:

Draculesti Romania wrote:
I hear you, man.

There is nothing wrong with polygamy, numerous socities past and present permitted it. Also it solves the "sin" of adultery.

Legitimacy? How do you know the child you are raising is your own and not her other husband's?

Do NOT recruit me your region wrote:In the early 90's in San Fransisco there was an LGBT riot outside a church were the LGBT people performed sexual acts outside the church and even reportedly shouted "give us your children" to the church members and they harassed the church members.

Do you have a link to this? I'm rather shocked by this if it's true.

Condunum wrote:

Alaje wrote:
WTF, how do you come to that conclusion? Do you find something inherently good about homos? I'd like to hear what that'd be.

Perhaps he said it to show how preposterous the claim that they threaten society is.

No, I was serious. Remove homosexuality and you change part of many influential historical figures and events, thus altering history itself, thus altering our present society.