Madredia wrote:Yes I did equate homosexuality to incest, because from an unbiased point of view, homosexuality, bestiality, incest, paedeophilia, and necrophilia are really should all be legal or all be illegal, you have to be consistent. And in response to everyone saying sex change and this are not the same, if someone wants to change, or at leaast ATTEMPT to change who they are, why not let them?
This law is only keeping minors from being sent to those camps.
Also:
Homosexuality-> two consenting adults-> should be legal
Beastiality-> a person and an animal, who can't consent-> should be illegal
Incest-> can be between two consenting adults, but is usually between an adult and a child-> Should be legal only between consenting adults
Pedophilia-> between an adult and a child-> should be illegal
Madredia wrote:People open your eyes!! This is basically like banning sex change surgery.
Except, minors aren't allowed to have sex change surgery, either.
Unavailable wrote:Ridiculous. If people want to go to some strange "gay conversion" therapies, they should be allowed to go there. Btw, how would you be sure I can't brainwash you into becoming gay/straight/bi/bdsm/...?
Its mainly being put in place to keep homophobic parents from shipping their LGBT kids off to 'pray away the gay' camps where they can be abused.
Also, its pretty well shown that you can't force a sexual orientation down somebody's throat. And, BDSM isn't a sexual orientation.
Kaleer wrote:Make it nationwide.
Dear merciful Jesus, please let this happen.
Unavailable wrote:Choronzon wrote:Because very rarely do the people enrolled in such "therapies" enroll by choice.
I put the right of the individual above the right of the parent to force their children to conform to their absurd and puerile worldview.
Ok, then don't ban the therapies, ban forced enrolment.
How the fuck do you tell if the enrollment is forced or not? Do you have some sort of magic truth machine?
Seriously, though. If somebody was holding a gun to your head (in such a way that it wouldn't be visible, and told you that if you said a word about a gun being to your head, they'd pull the trigger), and somebody else asked you if there was a gun being held to your head, would you say there was?
Unavailable wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
And how do you enforce it?
Parents say didn't do that. Indoctrinator says didn't do that.
For example, require counselling with a social worker (psychologist) prior to allowing the child to go to such therapy. It should be fairly simple for a skilled psychologist to tell if the child is being forced to go there or not and give green or red light accordingly.
And if the psychologist is biased? Or just plain unskilled?
One of my exes has a problem in that her psychologist is so fucking biased that she can't tell her anything. Essentially, her parents (who are most of the problem), are paying for her to lie to a therapist.
I had a similar problem myself.
Paulmania wrote:Just another reason why I hate California aside from its lack of seasons.
Lemme get this straight. 1. People voluntarily go to these camps. 2. They do not like being gay. 3. Because the service is rather stupid, it must be banned, 4. even though people do want to become heterosexual (and think they are, whatever).
1. Not usually.
2. Actually, most of the time, they like it very much.
3. Actually, because a lot of the time, the people in the camps are being abused.
4. No. Their homophobic parents want them to be heterosexual.
The Ben Boys wrote:Though I don't know if I agree with "Gay Conversion" Therapy, I heartily disagree with this bill. It's not the government's job to do this, it's not endangering anyone physically to my knowledge, and it doesn't breach individual rights.
Actually, it does often endanger those who are in the programs, mentally and emotionally, which are arguably worse than being physically endangered, and since most of those who are in the programs are being put in them against their will, their rights are being breached. Nice try, though.