Page 4 of 4
Posted:
Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:22 pmby Wikkiwallana
Blouman Empire wrote:Wikkiwallana wrote:Paul wants to ban gay marriage.
A real libertarian (e.g not what America defines it as) would be for gay marriage.
Paul isn't a libertarian even by the American definition. But this thread is not about Paul, can we please not have it devolve into a discussion of him like every other damn thread?
Posted:
Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:23 pmby Carneval
Blouman Empire wrote:Wikkiwallana wrote:Paul wants to ban gay marriage.
A real libertarian (e.g not what America defines it as) would be for gay marriage.
e.g. means "for the sake of an example" in latin. You mean to use i.e. which is a reiteration.
Posted:
Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:28 pmby Zaharawi
How in anyway is what I said threatening? The fact that I classify it as a crime? Is it not a crime for people to steal? Well, this should be considered another form of stealing.
Posted:
Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:30 pmby Tropical Isles
the first option. I'm straight but not narrow.
Posted:
Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:32 pmby Nansurium
So are you asking if we are for homosexuality in general or the actual "rights" movement?
Am I allowed to be indifferent? If you want to be gay or if you think that you were born gay, more power to you. Just as long as you don't flaunt it and don't get in my bubble we're cool.
Posted:
Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:33 pmby Buffett and Colbert
Carneval wrote:Zaharawi wrote:I guess the number one reason I voted for is because I am gay. Secondly, it is extremely ignorant and self centred of people to dine people the ability to pursue happiness--a right the American founding fathers fought so hard to accomplish. To marginalize certain group of people and prevent them from this equality should be crime against humanity.
Although I agree with a less extreme version of your argument, attacking your opponent doesn't convince them to agree with you. If you want to make someone pro-gay, Calmly state it in a non-threatening manner
A thicker skin. Grow one.
Posted:
Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:34 pmby Carneval
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Carneval wrote:Although I agree with a less extreme version of your argument, attacking your opponent doesn't convince them to agree with you. If you want to make someone pro-gay, Calmly state it in a non-threatening manner
A thicker skin. Grow one.
let's face it, shouting at people DOESNT WORK
Let's compare people like Pinella to people like Torre. Who seems to win the most arguments with the ump