Paul isn't a libertarian even by the American definition. But this thread is not about Paul, can we please not have it devolve into a discussion of him like every other damn thread?
Advertisement
by Wikkiwallana » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:22 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Tropical Isles » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:30 pm
by Nansurium » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:32 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:33 pm
Carneval wrote:Zaharawi wrote:I guess the number one reason I voted for is because I am gay. Secondly, it is extremely ignorant and self centred of people to dine people the ability to pursue happiness--a right the American founding fathers fought so hard to accomplish. To marginalize certain group of people and prevent them from this equality should be crime against humanity.
Although I agree with a less extreme version of your argument, attacking your opponent doesn't convince them to agree with you. If you want to make someone pro-gay, Calmly state it in a non-threatening manner
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Carneval » Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:34 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Britain Modern RP, Cheroa, Eurocom, Foxyshire, Gaybeans, Gonswanza, Khardsland, Molchistan, Philjia, Seapol, The Notorious Mad Jack, Tillania, Tinhampton, Tungstan, Turenia
Advertisement