NATION

PASSWORD

Is There a "War On Women" in the U.S.A.?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is there a "War On Women" in the U.S.A.?

Yes.
165
44%
No.
209
56%
 
Total votes : 374

User avatar
Forster Keys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19584
Founded: Mar 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Forster Keys » Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:56 am

The fact that there's a whole lot of feminist threads appearing on NS at the moment might be reflecting something. I'm not sure. I'm just the amateur sociologist that they put in the corner.
The blue sky above beckons us to take our freedom, to paint our path across its vastness. Across a million blades of grass, through the roars of our elation and a thousand thundering hooves, we begin our reply.

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:59 am

Transvaginal ultrasounds, birth control bans, redefining rape, public lists of everyone who gets an abortion and who the they got it from, allowing hospitals to deny emergency life saving abortions…

No, I don't see any War on Women here. :roll:
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:01 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:Transvaginal ultrasounds, birth control bans, redefining rape, public lists of everyone who gets an abortion and who the they got it from, allowing hospitals to deny emergency life saving abortions…

No, I don't see any War on Women here. :roll:

I dunno, I kinda liked that one...
In 2012, the FBI changed their definition from "The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will." to "The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim."
Last edited by Laerod on Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Republic of Lanos
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17727
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Lanos » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:05 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:Transvaginal ultrasounds, birth control bans, redefining rape, public lists of everyone who gets an abortion and who the they got it from, allowing hospitals to deny emergency life saving abortions…

No, I don't see any War on Women here. :roll:


Hilary Rosen would like to think that women who stay at home have done nothing in terms of work. The left also tends to attack conservative women harshly because they don't share the same beliefs as them.

Yeah sure. Say the GOP's doing it but deny the Democrats are doing it to conservative women. Both sides do it but the left's more hypocritical on it.

User avatar
Running Dog Capitalists
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Running Dog Capitalists » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:07 am

I would say the war on women is from the Democrat side. The side that dictates that women are required to be pro-abortion, pro-universal healthcare (But hey, Keep the government out of myuterus. How does that work again?), and, most importantly, pro-Democrat. The Democrats thrive on making women feel like victims and, by the posts here and on other sites, it has worked pretty well.

Now that is the Democrat line.

But watch how they actually treat women who do not toe that line. It is vicious and brutal. All I need remember is the anti-Hillary arguments the pro-Obama supporters threw out. No, I am not talking the whole Bros before Hoes argument although my Obama-supporting friend gave me one. If Obamacare passes the Supremes then you will see a great many women suffer because of inept healthcare and bureaucracy.

Want to hold Democrats up to the high-level scrutiny the GOP endures? Ask about the Obama WH paying women 18% less. Ask about how the Democrats regard stay-at-home mothers? How about Dunn's revelation that the WH was hostile to women? Shouldn't the WH be an egalitarian paradise? Should not the media have screamed to high heaven about this? Would they have done so if this was a Republican administration?

Continue your conversation(?) and know that this whole war on women bullshit, along with the class warfare bullshit, was engineered to supply Obama with a way to avoid talking about his actual record and accomplishments. Which suck balls. Cuz women don't care, or understand, about economic policy and such. They are more concerned with the Catholic Church telling employees they can't use contraception (they don't).

Yes, that is what is important.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:07 am

The Republic of Lanos wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Transvaginal ultrasounds, birth control bans, redefining rape, public lists of everyone who gets an abortion and who the they got it from, allowing hospitals to deny emergency life saving abortions…

No, I don't see any War on Women here. :roll:


Hilary Rosen would like to think that women who stay at home have done nothing in terms of work. The left also tends to attack conservative women harshly because they don't share the same beliefs as them.

Yeah sure. Say the GOP's doing it but deny the Democrats are doing it to conservative women. Both sides do it but the left's more hypocritical on it.

How many conservative women that want to be stay at home moms are forced to have divorces, lots of sex, or otherwise abandon their lifestyles by legislative means? Fals equivalence there. Majorly false equivalence.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:07 am

The Republic of Lanos wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Transvaginal ultrasounds, birth control bans, redefining rape, public lists of everyone who gets an abortion and who the they got it from, allowing hospitals to deny emergency life saving abortions…

No, I don't see any War on Women here. :roll:


Hilary Rosen would like to think that women who stay at home have done nothing in terms of work. The left also tends to attack conservative women harshly because they don't share the same beliefs as them.

Yeah sure. Say the GOP's doing it but deny the Democrats are doing it to conservative women. Both sides do it but the left's more hypocritical on it.

who cares what hillary rosen things? she is a pundit on CNN.
whatever

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:09 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:I would say the war on women is from the Democrat side.


Oh, seriously. Please. Go and acquaint yourself with reality and come back.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:09 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:I would say the war on women is from the Democrat side. The side that dictates that women are required to be pro-abortion, pro-universal healthcare (But hey, Keep the government out of myuterus. How does that work again?), and, most importantly, pro-Democrat. The Democrats thrive on making women feel like victims and, by the posts here and on other sites, it has worked pretty well.

Now that is the Democrat line.

But watch how they actually treat women who do not toe that line. It is vicious and brutal. All I need remember is the anti-Hillary arguments the pro-Obama supporters threw out. No, I am not talking the whole Bros before Hoes argument although my Obama-supporting friend gave me one. If Obamacare passes the Supremes then you will see a great many women suffer because of inept healthcare and bureaucracy.

Want to hold Democrats up to the high-level scrutiny the GOP endures? Ask about the Obama WH paying women 18% less. Ask about how the Democrats regard stay-at-home mothers? How about Dunn's revelation that the WH was hostile to women? Shouldn't the WH be an egalitarian paradise? Should not the media have screamed to high heaven about this? Would they have done so if this was a Republican administration?

Continue your conversation(?) and know that this whole war on women bullshit, along with the class warfare bullshit, was engineered to supply Obama with a way to avoid talking about his actual record and accomplishments. Which suck balls. Cuz women don't care, or understand, about economic policy and such. They are more concerned with the Catholic Church telling employees they can't use contraception (they don't).

Yes, that is what is important.

that didnt make a lick of sense and it didnt do anything do dispel the idea that there is a war on women.
whatever

User avatar
New Edom
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23241
Founded: Mar 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Edom » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:10 am

The Republic of Lanos wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Transvaginal ultrasounds, birth control bans, redefining rape, public lists of everyone who gets an abortion and who the they got it from, allowing hospitals to deny emergency life saving abortions…

No, I don't see any War on Women here. :roll:


Hilary Rosen would like to think that women who stay at home have done nothing in terms of work. The left also tends to attack conservative women harshly because they don't share the same beliefs as them.

Yeah sure. Say the GOP's doing it but deny the Democrats are doing it to conservative women. Both sides do it but the left's more hypocritical on it.


In fact actually let's take it a little farther: leftists in the USA and in Canada have been attacking the traditional family, and have not offered anything better to replace it with. Conservatives have no choice but to prevent them from making further gains, because there is clearly no common ground that feminists are prepared to stand on. Looking at the results of rampant feminism in countries like Sweden is proof of this. The laws being put forward on abortion are the result of feminism refusing to come to the table to talk about sexual integrity on their own part as well as on the part of others. It's not a war on women; it's a war on feminism.
"The three articles of Civil Service faith: it takes longer to do things quickly, it's far more expensive to do things cheaply, and it's more democratic to do things in secret." - Jim Hacker "Yes Minister"

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112546
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:10 am

Ashmoria wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:
Hilary Rosen would like to think that women who stay at home have done nothing in terms of work. The left also tends to attack conservative women harshly because they don't share the same beliefs as them.

Yeah sure. Say the GOP's doing it but deny the Democrats are doing it to conservative women. Both sides do it but the left's more hypocritical on it.

who cares what hillary rosen things? she is a pundit on CNN.

And she got slapped around by the Democrats almost immediately.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:11 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:Cuz women don't care, or understand, about economic policy and such.

Yes! Women know your limits!

User avatar
Running Dog Capitalists
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Running Dog Capitalists » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:11 am

Ashmoria wrote:who cares what hillary rosen things? she is a pundit on CNN.


A pundit who has visited the WH more times than any General in the military and who has met with Jarrett and Obama. She is a Democrat advisor. NOW weighed in and basically agreed with Rosen's initial point. Being a stay-at-home mother basically makes you unable to comment on economics and government policy.

User avatar
Ordo Drakul
Diplomat
 
Posts: 874
Founded: Aug 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Ordo Drakul » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:11 am

Why is infanticide considered by the posters to be a "War on Women"? Don't most women want to keep their offspring? :unsure:

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:11 am

Laerod wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Transvaginal ultrasounds, birth control bans, redefining rape, public lists of everyone who gets an abortion and who the they got it from, allowing hospitals to deny emergency life saving abortions…

No, I don't see any War on Women here. :roll:

I dunno, I kinda liked that one...
In 2012, the FBI changed their definition from "The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will." to "The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim."

Wrong instance of redefinition:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/09/abortion-forcible-rape-language-hr-3_n_820846.html
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:12 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:who cares what hillary rosen things? she is a pundit on CNN.

And she got slapped around by the Democrats almost immediately.

and she clarified and apologized as quickly.
whatever

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:12 am

New Edom wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:
Hilary Rosen would like to think that women who stay at home have done nothing in terms of work. The left also tends to attack conservative women harshly because they don't share the same beliefs as them.

Yeah sure. Say the GOP's doing it but deny the Democrats are doing it to conservative women. Both sides do it but the left's more hypocritical on it.


In fact actually let's take it a little farther: leftists in the USA and in Canada have been attacking the traditional family, and have not offered anything better to replace it with. Conservatives have no choice but to prevent them from making further gains, because there is clearly no common ground that feminists are prepared to stand on. Looking at the results of rampant feminism in countries like Sweden is proof of this. The laws being put forward on abortion are the result of feminism refusing to come to the table to talk about sexual integrity on their own part as well as on the part of others. It's not a war on women; it's a war on feminism.

Do share evidence for your baseless claims...

User avatar
Running Dog Capitalists
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Running Dog Capitalists » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:12 am

Ordo Drakul wrote:Why is infanticide considered by the posters to be a "War on Women"? Don't most women want to keep their offspring? :unsure:


Pro-Baby = anti-Woman. Don't you keep up with these things?

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:12 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:who cares what hillary rosen things? she is a pundit on CNN.


A pundit who has visited the WH more times than any General in the military and who has met with Jarrett and Obama. She is a Democrat advisor. NOW weighed in and basically agreed with Rosen's initial point. Being a stay-at-home mother basically makes you unable to comment on economics and government policy.

who cares? do i hold mitt romney responsible for something gretchen carlson says on foxnews?
whatever

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:13 am

The Republic of Lanos wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Transvaginal ultrasounds, birth control bans, redefining rape, public lists of everyone who gets an abortion and who the they got it from, allowing hospitals to deny emergency life saving abortions…

No, I don't see any War on Women here. :roll:


Hilary Rosen would like to think that women who stay at home have done nothing in terms of work. The left also tends to attack conservative women harshly because they don't share the same beliefs as them.

Yeah sure. Say the GOP's doing it but deny the Democrats are doing it to conservative women. Both sides do it but the left's more hypocritical on it.

Who the hell is Hilary Rosen, and why should I care what she has to say?

And how is disagreeing, even name calling, on anywhere near the same level as legislative attempts at restricting freedoms and legal protections?
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:13 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Laerod wrote:I dunno, I kinda liked that one...

Wrong instance of redefinition:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/09/abortion-forcible-rape-language-hr-3_n_820846.html

That's pretty terrible.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:14 am

Ordo Drakul wrote:Why is infanticide considered by the posters to be a "War on Women"? Don't most women want to keep their offspring? :unsure:

infanticide is murder. no one considers it a war on women when female murderers are punished.
whatever

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:16 am

Laerod wrote:

That's pretty terrible.

There was a thread on it, way back when. I don't remember if I started it, or added a link to it, or what, but I seem to remember contributing some sort of info source.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:18 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Laerod wrote:That's pretty terrible.

There was a thread on it, way back when. I don't remember if I started it, or added a link to it, or what, but I seem to remember contributing some sort of info source.

I've only really been paying the occasional bit of attention since April Fools. And sometimes I see dumb threads and just avoid them on principle.

User avatar
Running Dog Capitalists
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Running Dog Capitalists » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:18 am

Ashmoria wrote:who cares? do i hold mitt romney responsible for something gretchen carlson says on foxnews?


Has Carlson met with Romney to discuss policy? 30+ times?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: A Herd of Cows, Bovad, Eahland, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hidrandia, IdontCare, New Temecula, Niolia, Omphalos, So uh lab here, Statesburg, The Holy Therns, Tinhampton

Advertisement

Remove ads