NATION

PASSWORD

Is There a "War On Women" in the U.S.A.?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is there a "War On Women" in the U.S.A.?

Yes.
165
44%
No.
209
56%
 
Total votes : 374

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:21 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:who cares? do i hold mitt romney responsible for something gretchen carlson says on foxnews?


Has Carlson met with Romney to discuss policy? 30+ times?

dont know, dont care.

it is legitimate to talk about what ms rosen said about mrs romney. it is not legitimate to pretend that she is a spokesperson for the president or the democratic party.
whatever

User avatar
Sensitive New Age Guys
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Mar 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sensitive New Age Guys » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:27 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
Has Carlson met with Romney to discuss policy? 30+ times?

dont know, dont care.

it is legitimate to talk about what ms rosen said about mrs romney. it is not legitimate to pretend that she is a spokesperson for the president or the democratic party.

Televison interviews of Presidential politics do not happen in a vacuum. It's hard to imagine that she wasn't consulted by her higher ups. it was a bad call by the D. party.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:29 am

Wow, that is a terrible poll result. I can only hope it improves as people come home from work.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:30 am

Sensitive New Age Guys wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:dont know, dont care.

it is legitimate to talk about what ms rosen said about mrs romney. it is not legitimate to pretend that she is a spokesperson for the president or the democratic party.

Televison interviews of Presidential politics do not happen in a vacuum. It's hard to imagine that she wasn't consulted by her higher ups. it was a bad call by the D. party.

Stop straying off topic. This thread is not about an alleged repression of being able to pursue a conservative lifestyle.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:32 am

Sensitive New Age Guys wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:dont know, dont care.

it is legitimate to talk about what ms rosen said about mrs romney. it is not legitimate to pretend that she is a spokesperson for the president or the democratic party.

Televison interviews of Presidential politics do not happen in a vacuum. It's hard to imagine that she wasn't consulted by her higher ups. it was a bad call by the D. party.

it was on CNN. she works for CNN. she wasnt being interviewed she was doing her job.
whatever

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:34 am

Laerod wrote:
Sensitive New Age Guys wrote:Televison interviews of Presidential politics do not happen in a vacuum. It's hard to imagine that she wasn't consulted by her higher ups. it was a bad call by the D. party.

Stop straying off topic. This thread is not about an alleged repression of being able to pursue a conservative lifestyle.


Oh come, now, don't you know how oppressed white Christians are? I mean, surely everybody knows that their women (because, gosh, women aren't people themselves and do not count) are forced to have abortions? And that their marriages are forcibly dissolved? And that their politicians are forced to have gay affairs that later become public?
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:43 am

so funny story about republican response to ms rosen:

in angry response to ms rosen the spokesman for the catholic league tweeted this:

Lesbian Dem Hilary Rosen tells Ann Romney she never worked a day in her life. Unlike Rosen, who had to adopt kids, Ann raised 5 of her own.

(that donohue guy. what a dick)(no im not trying to claim that the catholic league speaks for the republican party)
this tweet was so offensively stupid that sean spicer (who IS a spokesman for the republican party) tweeted this in response:

The @catholicleague should be encouraging adoption, not demeaning the parents who are blessed to raise these children

which is a really nice response. except that this republican (communications director at the repulbican national committee) just endorsed gay adoption which the republican party is solidly against.

oops that was a no-win situation.
whatever

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:45 am

Ashmoria wrote:Lesbian Dem Hilary Rosen tells Ann Romney she never worked a day in her life. Unlike Rosen, who had to adopt kids, Ann raised 5 of her own.


Just...what. What a complete and utterly fucking despicable person.
Last edited by Nadkor on Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:51 am

Nadkor wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:Lesbian Dem Hilary Rosen tells Ann Romney she never worked a day in her life. Unlike Rosen, who had to adopt kids, Ann raised 5 of her own.


Just...what. What a complete and utterly fucking despicable person.

Really, after the top clergy in the American Catholic Church started waging a legal war against groups representing molested children, this doesn't come as a surprise at all.

User avatar
Ordo Drakul
Diplomat
 
Posts: 874
Founded: Aug 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Ordo Drakul » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:52 am

Laerod wrote:Really, after the top clergy in the American Catholic Church started waging a legal war against groups representing molested children, this doesn't come as a surprise at all.

Could you source this, please?

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:54 am

Nadkor wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:Lesbian Dem Hilary Rosen tells Ann Romney she never worked a day in her life. Unlike Rosen, who had to adopt kids, Ann raised 5 of her own.


Just...what. What a complete and utterly fucking despicable person.


the man is a professional asshole.
whatever

User avatar
Running Dog Capitalists
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Running Dog Capitalists » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:57 am

Ashmoria wrote:which is a really nice response. except that this republican (communications director at the repulbican national committee) just endorsed gay adoption which the republican party is solidly against.

oops that was a no-win situation.


No win? It shows compassion. It also shows the non-monolithic nature of the GOP that liberals don't understand. There is a huge libertarian presense in the GOP that is for parentless children getting adopted to any family that can support and love them. The reason libertarians don't exist in the Democrat party is do to the rabid anti-Capitalist sentiments that they foster and strive for.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:58 am

Ordo Drakul wrote:
Laerod wrote:Really, after the top clergy in the American Catholic Church started waging a legal war against groups representing molested children, this doesn't come as a surprise at all.

Could you source this, please?

Yes.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:59 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:which is a really nice response. except that this republican (communications director at the repulbican national committee) just endorsed gay adoption which the republican party is solidly against.

oops that was a no-win situation.


No win? It shows compassion. It also shows the non-monolithic nature of the GOP that liberals don't understand. There is a huge libertarian presense in the GOP that is for parentless children getting adopted to any family that can support and love them. The reason libertarians don't exist in the Democrat party is do to the rabid anti-Capitalist sentiments that they foster and strive for.

Maybe they should speak up.

User avatar
1000 Cats
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: Jul 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby 1000 Cats » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:00 am

I don't think it's so much a war, but there are a number of pundits and politicians who seem to be able to do nothing but demean women. Look at how Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin were treated by many entertainers and broadcasters. So often it wasn't about their ideas, even though at least one of them had some really stupid ones, and more about how they look at a given time.

That having been said, if we're talking just civics and economics, the war on women is if anything waged by women upon themselves, at the behest of culture that continues to give the notion that women need not have the same level of ambition that men have. The glass ceiling is pretty much gone; there are women in very high positions, and I can't remember the last time I heard someone complaining that they were denied a promotion due to their gender. It's a big deal now; it's just that people still haven't come to taking advantage of this newfound potential equality, making for a persevering, but hitherto untreatable, inequality.
Your friendly neighborhood zoophile. I'm here to answer questions. Also, we have a region: Zoo!

Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.


Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!


FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
Factbook/Q&A | RP | Conlang | Short Story

User avatar
Running Dog Capitalists
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Running Dog Capitalists » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:03 am

Laerod wrote:
Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
No win? It shows compassion. It also shows the non-monolithic nature of the GOP that liberals don't understand. There is a huge libertarian presense in the GOP that is for parentless children getting adopted to any family that can support and love them. The reason libertarians don't exist in the Democrat party is do to the rabid anti-Capitalist sentiments that they foster and strive for.

Maybe they should speak up.


We do all the time. It is just hard to get past the prejudice that you and your Democrat brothers and sisters show at the first sign of any Conservative or Libertarian policy stance. Talk of tax cuts instantly turns into 'You hate poor people." and talk of people taking responsibility for their lifestyles turns into 'You hate <add group here>!' Hard to believe that you don't get the full story.

User avatar
Evil Siamese Cats
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 145
Founded: Mar 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Evil Siamese Cats » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:03 am

Stedicules wrote:yes the usa works to destroy the female threat in america and re-instate the wonderful sausage fests of old.

womens' rights are being threatened. oklahoma has proposed a bill saying a fertilized egg is a human and in tennessee they're working to stop "gateway sexual activity" between men and women entirely. if the bill passes, a mother kissing her child would be a criminal charge.

american law makers need to stop telling women what's good for them and what's not. let them decide.


That Oklahoma bill doesn't have much of a chance, given that Mississippi rejected a similar bill overwhelmingly in 2011. I can't imagine things are that different in Oklahoma. Besides, that might be hard to keep up in court.

As for the Tennesse law...go no further than Lawrence v. Texas. Tennessee can ban all the sex they want; the laws will be struck down as unconstitutional.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:03 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:which is a really nice response. except that this republican (communications director at the repulbican national committee) just endorsed gay adoption which the republican party is solidly against.

oops that was a no-win situation.


No win? It shows compassion. It also shows the non-monolithic nature of the GOP that liberals don't understand. There is a huge libertarian presense in the GOP that is for parentless children getting adopted to any family that can support and love them. The reason libertarians don't exist in the Democrat party is do to the rabid anti-Capitalist sentiments that they foster and strive for.

uhhuh but mr spicer is the communications director at the repulbican national committee which means he is supposed to communicate the republican stance on things. the party is against gay adoption.

but it was an extremly nicely done response.
whatever

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:03 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
Laerod wrote:Maybe they should speak up.


We do all the time.

Prove it.

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:05 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:It also shows the non-monolithic nature of the GOP that liberals don't understand.


This is just beautiful. It's poetic in its irony.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:05 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
Laerod wrote:Maybe they should speak up.


We do all the time. It is just hard to get past the prejudice that you and your Democrat brothers and sisters show at the first sign of any Conservative or Libertarian policy stance. Talk of tax cuts instantly turns into 'You hate poor people." and talk of people taking responsibility for their lifestyles turns into 'You hate <add group here>!' Hard to believe that you don't get the full story.

when the republican party officially supports gay rights you will have a point. until then anti-gay is the republican position.
whatever

User avatar
Running Dog Capitalists
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Mar 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Running Dog Capitalists » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:06 am

Laerod wrote:
Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
We do all the time.

Prove it.


I just did.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:10 am

Running Dog Capitalists wrote:
Laerod wrote:Prove it.


I just did.

Okay, let me show you the definition of proof I'm going by:
proof
noun
1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.

User avatar
The Congregationists
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1770
Founded: May 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Congregationists » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:10 am

There are those in America serious about reducing sex strictly to reproduction - hence their opposition to abortion, birth control and so on. I don't know if this constitutes a "war on women" so much as women's rights and freedoms being collateral damage in this effort. Whether this movement can be taken at face value when they affirm the "sanctity of life" or some such platitude as their true motive is debatable. I think movements to restrict abortion, contraception and birth control court disaster. But to say they're a "war on women" is a stretch. Not out of the question - again, I think the true motives of pro lifers are questionalbe - but a stretch never the less.
•Criticism of sentimental love, marriage, sex, religion, and rituals.
•Valuing reason over emotion and imagination
•Ironic, indirect, and impersonal (objective) representation of ideas.
•Uncompromising criticism of romantic illusions.
•Advocacy of pragmatism and disapproval of idealism and ideology.
•Especially vehement opposition to neo-liberalism, social democracy, communism, libertarianism and feminism.
•Satirisation of irrational and whimsical attitudes of the so-called creative class.
•Criticism of social, political, cultural, and moral customs and manners of the contemporary society.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:10 am

Yep.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Juristonia, Likhinia, Shidei, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest, Tillania, Turenia

Advertisement

Remove ads