If you can turn shit into gold, why aren't you using that to get girls, then?
Advertisement
by Astrolinium » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:14 pm
by Ceannairceach » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:14 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:16 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Alyakia » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:19 pm
by Ceannairceach » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:23 pm
Tekania wrote:Be yourself.... But if you suck so bad in person no girl wants you... well tough titties.
by Katganistan » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:25 pm
Novus Honoris wrote:just be yourself.
by Condunum » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:25 pm
by Germanic Templars » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:29 pm
Katganistan wrote:Novus Honoris wrote:just be yourself.
See if you have mutual interests. Go to places that interest YOU -- if you like Science Fiction, go to a convention. Comic books, same.Like reading, head to a book shop that has a coffee shop in it. Like art, go to a museum. People who share those interests WILL be there, and you may be able to strike up a conversation about whatever it is you both like.
If things seem to be going well, ask if she wants to grab a bite to eat, or grab a cup of coffee. Don't force it and don't talk about lots of future plans for the two of you off the bat -- that will creep her out. Trust me on that.
by Israslovakahzerbajan » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:29 pm
Rhodmhire wrote:I could give you lessons on treating women well if you want.
The starting rate is $120 a week for classes.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Oh, I bet it counts alright...otaku gets anyone a x50 multiplier on their hell points.
by Conserative Morality » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:31 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Lolquid?
by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:33 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Xeng He » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:34 pm
Blazedtown wrote:[an ism is] A term used by people who won't admit their true beliefs, or don't have any.
by Astrolinium » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:35 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:36 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Episarta » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:37 pm
by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:37 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Lackadaisical2 » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:37 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Germanic Templars » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Caffeinated, Google [Bot], Habsburg Mexico, Ineva, Kostane, New Temecula, Shrillland, The Xenopolis Confederation, Tiami, Trump Almighty, Uiiop
Advertisement