Advertisement
by Neutraligon » Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:12 pm
by Gauthier » Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:28 pm
Neutraligon wrote:deleted
by Neutraligon » Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:29 pm
Gauthier wrote:Neutraligon wrote:deleted
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Akre
http://www.purefood.org/rbgh/akre022103.cfm
by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:32 pm
Neutraligon wrote:
I went and searched for it myself. Seriously whatever happened to journalistic ethics.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Greed and Death » Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:34 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
I went and searched for it myself. Seriously whatever happened to journalistic ethics.
They never existed. The Spanish-American war was started in part because of two newspaper owners attempting to one-up each other by making up ridiculous stories about the 1895 war in Cuba.
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:56 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I worry for the Friends in FOX and Friends. Not because they're so wrong, but because they're so hideously incompetent at being wrong. They passed up a chance to call Obama the Antichrist to link the guy to Occupy? Sloppy!
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by SaintB » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:09 pm
by Gauthier » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:10 pm
Wikkiwallana wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:I worry for the Friends in FOX and Friends. Not because they're so wrong, but because they're so hideously incompetent at being wrong. They passed up a chance to call Obama the Antichrist to link the guy to Occupy? Sloppy!
I see I wasn't the only one to catch that.
by Gauthier » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:12 pm
by Nationstatelandsville » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:13 pm
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:17 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Gauthier » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:21 pm
Wikkiwallana wrote:Gauthier wrote:
Yeah but then that would imply FOX thinks the guy should have had a clear shot at Obama in the first place. And not even FOXNews has sunk to advocating presidential assassinations yet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQcvbw6ExTQ
You were saying?
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:25 pm
Gauthier wrote:
But nothing to the effect of "We need to liberate the White House" or "Kill the AntiChrist". Advocating the killing of the opposition party is one thing. Calling for a presidential assassination is another.
Plus much as we'd like to use that FOXNews dumped Glenn like a constipation.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Nationstatelandsville » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:26 pm
Gauthier wrote:
But nothing to the effect of "We need to liberate the White House" or "Kill the AntiChrist". Advocating the killing of the opposition party is one thing. Calling for a presidential assassination is another.
Plus much as we'd like to use that FOXNews dumped Glenn like a constipation.
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:29 pm
Gauthier wrote:Plus much as we'd like to use that FOXNews dumped Glenn like a constipation.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/07/roger-ailes-happy-beck-fired-quit_n_846001.html wrote:"We felt Glenn brought additional information, a unique perspective, a certain amount of passion and insight to the channel and he did," Ailes said. "But that story of what's going on and why America is in trouble today, I think he told that story as well as could be told. Whether you can just keep telling that story or not ... we're not so sure."
But he stressed that he will continue to work with Beck. "We like each other," he said.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Gauthier » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:33 pm
Wikkiwallana wrote:Gauthier wrote:
But nothing to the effect of "We need to liberate the White House" or "Kill the AntiChrist". Advocating the killing of the opposition party is one thing. Calling for a presidential assassination is another.
Plus much as we'd like to use that FOXNews dumped Glenn like a constipation.
I don't see the difference.
by Neutraligon » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:52 pm
by Ethel mermania » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:52 pm
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:54 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Simon Cowell of the RR » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:56 pm
Pieman City wrote:Well at least they weren't praising the guy for trying to remove Obama from government.
That's still a very dangerous thing they're doing though. Has far too much potential to incite violent action against Occupy protestors which, wether you agree with them or not, isn't a good thing.
by New England and The Maritimes » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:58 pm
Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:Pieman City wrote:Well at least they weren't praising the guy for trying to remove Obama from government.
That's still a very dangerous thing they're doing though. Has far too much potential to incite violent action against Occupy protestors which, wether you agree with them or not, isn't a good thing.
I believe that a correspondent did say that after the execution of Bin Laden. She had said Obama instead of Osama and then said something about wishing he was dead too.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by The Rich Port » Sun Nov 20, 2011 5:00 pm
by SaintB » Sun Nov 20, 2011 5:02 pm
by Saiwania » Sun Nov 20, 2011 5:11 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, Ifreann, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, TescoPepsi, Theodorable
Advertisement