This woman thinks all men support rape

[Atlantian Empire]

http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/a-man-is-a-rape-supporter-if/


Doesn't say that flatout, but the intent is there. The list is so beyond dumb in some areas it is obviously meant to encompass all men in general. Didn't see this on here, maybe I missed it. Here are some highlights..

■He has gone to a strip club.

somebody better lock me up then! How dare I like looking at attractive women shaking their money makers!

■He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.”

Silly me thinking I had freedom of speech.

■He watches pornography in which women are depicted.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHA!! Lesson here....You watch porn with women in it you are a rapist.


Thoughts NS. Even the ones that may have a point are vague. She doesn't even seem to have that high of a view on women for that matter.

[Norstal]

At first, my sarcasm meter went bonkers.

Then I read the comments and she was serious about this.

[Soviet Haaregrad]

Given that some of her items listed were legit, it was pretty disappointing to see her go well off into crazyville.

The only stripclub I've been to I was dragged to by a girl... so, does that means I'm a rape supporter, or that both of us are, or that just she is?

[Lackadaisical2]

I support rape. Especially when people rape me... under the right circumstances.

[Norstal]

Given that some of her items listed were legit, it was pretty disappointing to see her go well off into crazyville.

The only stripclub I've been to I was dragged to by a girl... so, does that means I'm a rape supporter, or that both of us are, or that just she is?

Good luck trying to find a man who doesn't watch porn. Seriously.

[Atlantian Empire]

Given that some of her items listed were legit, it was pretty disappointing to see her go well off into crazyville.

The only stripclub I've been to I was dragged to by a girl... so, does that means I'm a rape supporter, or that both of us are, or that just she is?

Just you as this list doesn't seem to apply to women.

[Nightkill the Emperor]

Yeah, this chick is batshit insane.

[Aescentia]

Ah. Female chauvinism under the guise of feminism.

[Tectorum]

The only stripclub I've been to I was dragged to by a girl:p

Here i was think i was the only person whos girlfriend did this to them

[Wamitoria]

Yeah, this chick is batshit insane.

Indeed. I watch porn with women in it and I'm definitely not a rape supporter.

[Mahaj WA Seat]

Oh joy.

[Knezoneiroi]

The only logical explanation for her stance is penis envy.

[Aescentia]

Also, this.

He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.”

This does not equal a rape supporter. I hope to god that she was just trolling at this point, 'cause I lol'd.

[Tectorum]

This lady clearly wore lead pants over the meriada trench.

I personally never watch porn but the majority of my friends do and none of us support rape.

[Norstal]

I personally never watch porn but the majority of my friends do and none of us support rape.

Trust me, you'll watch/read one.

[Wikkiwallana]

I can hear the distant cry echoing on the wind now, can you? First the battle call of "feminazi", and then the slavering hordes will be upon us, the sexists claiming that this woman represents all of feminism.

[Aeronos]

Female chauvinism indeed. It's that dumb "All males are rapists driven by insatiable sex drives and everything is an act for more sex!" rhetoric, equivalent to the male "All females are mentally-inferior hysterical baby-cravers" rhetoric V_V

[Soviet Haaregrad]

Given that some of her items listed were legit, it was pretty disappointing to see her go well off into crazyville.

The only stripclub I've been to I was dragged to by a girl... so, does that means I'm a rape supporter, or that both of us are, or that just she is?

Just you as this list doesn't seem to apply to women.

Because in the mind of a chauvinist, only the other gender can be wrong. Fuck her for helping asshat male chauvinists try to defame feminism as female focused sexism.

[NERVUN]

Uh... That's an... interesting list.Some of the points I can kinda see, others though... woo boy.

[Wilgrove]

Hmmm, let's see how I stack up.

A man is a rape-supporter if…

He has ever sexually engaged with any woman while she was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion.

Hmm...on the physically restrained....does that include bondage play?

He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense.

The only problem I see with the current definition of rape is that some states has laws that says penetration has to take place before it's considered rape. Which means, legally, women can't rape men, since she, physically, lacks the equipment for penetration.

He has accused a rape victim of having “buyer’s remorse” or wanting to get money from the man.

Only time I've done that was the Duke Lacrosse Case of 2006, and ONLY because the accuser story kept changing all the damn time and was shaky at best.

He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation” where she “could be” attacked.

Nope

He has procured a prostitute.

Nope.

He characterizes prostitution as a “legitimate” “job” “choice” or defends men who purchase prostitutes.

I do question the myth about the "Happy Prostitute", but as far as a CONSENSUAL sexual act between a man and a prostitute, that's none of my business.

He has ever revealed he conceives of sex as fundamentally transactional.

What?

He has gone to a strip club.

No, and probably won't attend one. It's just one giant cock tease to be honest. If I wanted to oogle at women that I can't touch, I'd just visit porn sites. At least on the porn sites, no one cares if I whip it out.

He is anti-abortion.

Pro-Choice, once again, none of my business and none of the government's business either.

He is pro-”choice” because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available.

Nope, just rather women went to a doctor for an abortion instead of Stan and his Van in a back alley with a rusty coat hanger.

He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.”

Well...it is protected by the 1st amendment.

He watches pornography in which women are depicted.

Women....Men.....a furry....whatever.

He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present.

I guess this includes bondage?

He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get” a man.

Nope, don't really care what a woman wears to be honest.

He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,” or sexually harassed.

Nope, and I find such jokes disgusting to be honest.

He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects

What kind of movies do you watch?

He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification.

Nope.

He supports sexual “liberation” and claims women would have more sex with (more) men if society did not “inhibit” them.

Well to be honest, USA views on sex is a little fucked up thanks to the Puritans who first settled this land. We're still trying to become more sexually liberated like most European Countries.

He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,” “prudes,” “stuck-up,” “man-haters,” or psychologically ill.

*shrugs* or maybe they just have a low sex drive?

He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural” and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention.

Nope.

He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men.

Nope.

He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s.

You really should read up on Norse Mythology.

He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women.

Again....what?

He defends the physical abuse of women on the grounds of “consent.”

Well...that is the basis for legal definitions, unless we're talking about consent through coercion. A woman can, and should be allowed to withdraw consent at any time though.

He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent” or “willingness.”

Unless both parties are minor, then the adult person who takes advantage of a minor...that'd be called child molestation. A minor who has sex with a minor, as long as it's consensual and both parties are aware of what sex is and what it entails, I have no problem with it as long as they practice safe sex.

He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have children, or that they “should” have children.

Don't want children myself, would like to also find a woman who doesn't want (or have) children.

He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.”

Last time I've checked, both men AND women are sexual creatures and indeed do have sexual needs.

He discusses the “types” of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing.

So I'm a rapist if I have standards? LOL WUT?

He sexually objectifies lesbians or lesbian sexual activity.

Nope.

He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in them.

Well...I'm sorry I wasted my time on this list, and I apologize to anyone who actually read my entire response.

[Caninope]

What confused me the most were the "defends the current definition of rape" and "anti-abortion".

[SaintB]

The author of the article essentially thinks that anyone who has a sex drive automatically supports rape? I think she has some severe problems.

[Nadkor]

Female chauvinism indeed. It's that dumb "All males are rapists driven by insatiable sex drives and everything is an act for more sex!"

Which, funnily enough, is precisely the one peddled by men who say that women who go out in skimpy clothing, or who act provocatively, or, hell, even just dare to go to certain places at certain times, were "asking for it", or somehow deserved it, if they get raped.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

I'm a woman and this article just made me laugh my ass off. Still am.

[Wamitoria]

What confused me the most were the "defends the current definition of rape" and "anti-abortion".

Read closely, it's "anti-abortion and if they're pro-choice".