Advertisement
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:22 pm
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:34 pm
Wilgrove wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Alicorn Derpy
Our new virgin, bring her your gods!
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:37 pm
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:40 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:High school ponies!
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:42 pm
The Rich Port wrote:The Time Alliance wrote:What is NSFW considered as?
I honestly have no idea, and I've been answered in multiple ways.
At first, I thought it was no naughty bits (no nudity that shows naughty bits).
But apparently it's also nothing that would give a normal person a boner (lots of near-nudity, apparently, is a no-no, along with implied sex).
... So, what have we learned? Censorship is stupid, kids.
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
by The Rich Port » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:43 pm
Slorch wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
I honestly have no idea, and I've been answered in multiple ways.
At first, I thought it was no naughty bits (no nudity that shows naughty bits).
But apparently it's also nothing that would give a normal person a boner (lots of near-nudity, apparently, is a no-no, along with implied sex).
... So, what have we learned? Censorship is stupid, kids.
If that's so then we need to clean up all the pony threads...like alot
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:44 pm
Slorch wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
I honestly have no idea, and I've been answered in multiple ways.
At first, I thought it was no naughty bits (no nudity that shows naughty bits).
But apparently it's also nothing that would give a normal person a boner (lots of near-nudity, apparently, is a no-no, along with implied sex).
... So, what have we learned? Censorship is stupid, kids.
If that's so then we need to clean up all the pony threads...like alot
by Quidomne » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:46 pm
by The Rich Port » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:46 pm
Slorch wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
I honestly have no idea, and I've been answered in multiple ways.
At first, I thought it was no naughty bits (no nudity that shows naughty bits).
But apparently it's also nothing that would give a normal person a boner (lots of near-nudity, apparently, is a no-no, along with implied sex).
... So, what have we learned? Censorship is stupid, kids.
If that's so then we need to clean up all the pony threads...like alot
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:47 pm
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:49 pm
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:50 pm
Wilgrove wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Oh look atopic changetrio of milkshake drinkers!
and this is the milkmare that delivered the milk!
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
by The Time Alliance » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:52 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Slorch wrote:
If that's so then we need to clean up all the pony threads...like alot
And, to be fair, it's LOTS of near-nudity.
If it's just no top but hiding with hands, it's OK, along with a little areola. A butt crack? That's OK. Bare thighs because of thong? Cool.
But... Bare thighs, butt cracks, AND areola?
NOPE.
by The Rich Port » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:54 pm
The Time Alliance wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
And, to be fair, it's LOTS of near-nudity.
If it's just no top but hiding with hands, it's OK, along with a little areola. A butt crack? That's OK. Bare thighs because of thong? Cool.
But... Bare thighs, butt cracks, AND areola?
NOPE.
Stopping the near nudity? The Mormon is pleased.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:56 pm
by The Time Alliance » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:56 pm
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:58 pm
Patridam wrote:This is chart a might interesting if you know your personality off the top of your head. I'm evidently Celestia, but very close to being Big Mac.
http://i.imgur.com/uKrQPgT.jpgINTJ - Introverted - Intuitive - Thinking - Judging
Have original minds and great drive for implementing their ideas and achieving their goals. Quickly see patterns in external events and develop long-range explanatory perspectives. When committed, organize a job and carry it through, skeptical and independent, have high standards of competence and performance for themselves and others.
Here's a test if you don't yourself already (it's a little long):
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
by Ceffyltir » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:59 pm
Slorch wrote:So I finally talked to that guy with the VS jacket... and made a complete fool of my self
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:00 pm
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:01 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Slorch wrote:
If that's so then we need to clean up all the pony threads...like alot
And, to be fair, it's LOTS of near-nudity.
If it's just no top but hiding with hands, it's OK, along with a little areola. A butt crack? That's OK. Bare thighs because of thong? Cool.
But... Bare thighs, butt cracks, AND areola?
NOPE.
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
by Ximea » Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:05 pm
by Slorch » Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:07 pm
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement