[R] Trolling/Wishing Death in Leslie Jones Hack

[Gauthier]

Outright stating that making a movie is justifiable grounds for violent vigilante action to be taken against another person, in this case Leslie Jones:

So if someone capitalizes on the doxx and injures or kills her you'd call that fair retribution as well?

If someone (Hacked Victim) commits a crime (Association in the making of the terrible movie) then that would possibly leave them open to "Vigilante justice" as I would call it, it's fair game now.

[Yumyumsuppertime]

Trolling by intentionally using a term that the user was requested not to make.

My opening posts were just being edgy for shits and giggles. I got more serious over on as I put my two cents in.

Also

Dicks out for Harambe.

already did the harambe meme

Do not call me kiddo.

kiddo

Emphasis mine.

[Neutraligon]

You really should look up the rules to this forum, as it is your actions can get you warned or banned from this website

You needn't worry about me, I know when to go and stop, I've been doing this for a while.

Admitting to purposely stepping on the line.

[Ebliania]

Shrug I already reported them. Since they seem to be unable to debate without trolling I see no reason to pay any more attention to them. They are not worth my time.

As to the OP, find a prosecute the offenders.

you say that like you are important

Flamebait.

[Yumyumsuppertime]

Response editing without making it clear what was edited.

and answered it.

Fixed that for you.

The original exchange:

I saw what you said.

and ignored it

[Thaerania]

Response editing without making it clear what was edited.

Fixed that for you.

The original exchange:

and ignored it

If you can't see what was edited in a two word sentence, than you need some serious help.

[Yumyumsuppertime]

Response editing without making it clear what was edited.



The original exchange:

If you can't see what was edited in a two word sentence, than you need some serious help.

From the One Stop Rules Shop:

Flamebaiting: Posts that are made with the aim of angering someone indirectly. Not outright flame, but still liable to bring angry replies. Flame baiting is a far more subtle and covert action; it is an underhanded tactic that is designed to provoke a response from another player. It's in the same context of trolling but with flamebaiting it's just the one person. Also included under flamebaiting is malicious quote editing, changing the contents of a quoted post without showing the original text, either through color changes or strike-out.

[Thaerania]

If you can't see what was edited in a two word sentence, than you need some serious help.

From the One Stop Rules Shop:

Flamebaiting: Posts that are made with the aim of angering someone indirectly. Not outright flame, but still liable to bring angry replies. Flame baiting is a far more subtle and covert action; it is an underhanded tactic that is designed to provoke a response from another player. It's in the same context of trolling but with flamebaiting it's just the one person. Also included under flamebaiting is malicious quote editing, changing the contents of a quoted post without showing the original text, either through color changes or strike-out.

Quote editing can be flamebaiting, but not all quote editing is flame baiting.

[Kanaria]

From the One Stop Rules Shop:

Quote editing can be flamebaiting, but not all quote editing is flame baiting.

You deleted and replaced the entire original content of Orensta's post without a trace.
That is malicious quote editing.
That is flamebaiting.

[Yumyumsuppertime]

From the One Stop Rules Shop:

Quote editing can be flamebaiting, but not all quote editing is flame baiting.

Okay. We'll leave it up to the moderators to decide.

[Thaerania]

Quote editing can be flamebaiting, but not all quote editing is flame baiting.

You deleted and replaced the entire original content of Orensta's post without a trace.
That is malicious quote editing.
That is flamebaiting.

There is a trace, further up in the thread. "Fixed that for you" implies I edited it. Explain how it incites flame.

[Kanaria]

You deleted and replaced the entire original content of Orensta's post without a trace.
That is malicious quote editing.
That is flamebaiting.

There is a trace, further up in the thread. "Fixed that for you" implies I edited it. Explain how it incites flame.

Ah, I missed that.
In that case I suppose I'll satisfy myself with only one mod bootprint on my ass for spamming, and show myself out.

[Katganistan]

viewtopic.php?p=29723561#p29723561
viewtopic.php?p=29723575#p29723575
viewtopic.php?p=29723588#p29723588
viewtopic.php?p=29723600#p29723600
viewtopic.php?p=29723617#p29723617

Additionally:

Response editing without making it clear what was edited.



The original exchange:

If you can't see what was edited in a two word sentence, than you need some serious help.

*** 1 day ban for repeated flamebaiting ***

From the One Stop Rules Shop:

Quote editing can be flamebaiting, but not all quote editing is flame baiting.

It is when you do not leave the original material and completely change what was said.

Quote editing can be flamebaiting, but not all quote editing is flame baiting.

You deleted and replaced the entire original content of Orensta's post without a trace.
That is malicious quote editing.
That is flamebaiting.

You're not reporting anything. You should not be commenting on this thread. Report threads are not discussions. Unofficial warning for spamming.