Duchy of Sark wrote:I need help from the forum international law political experts here.
viewtopic.php?t=385120&f=15&view=unread#unread
Editing polls and locking threads is against international law by OSCE and UN.
To edit polls, the results would restart if I did that, you are disagreeing with international law through the inter-face GUI of the polls if you edit with no results change, so any accusation of poll editing is either false or an Interpol warrant arrest.
The OP need to be authenticated by the NationStates API cyber system for the polls to go to International UN server organisations, where all of them do a handshake encrypted peer to peer cyber-verification codes which if the polls are editied, hackers they are over riding the system and need to be brought to international justice by an authority figure such as Max Barry or an system administator.
The system administrators are fixing the polls when an incidient is happening and not you or me (forum user priveleges only globally), as if I did it the results would reset, is this technicaly correct? #
You need to speak to them to deal with the hackers but I need to see an international law enforcer administrator on the scene to make a ruling about this.
If there is more substantial problems with this, I might recommend have to close poll down because it's violating United Nations international law on democratic voting by not being securely un-hackable.
What is the nation states ruling on this?
http://www.osce.org/odihr/16935?download=true2 In accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant for
Civil and Political Rights and other international instruments, everyone has the right and must
be provided with the opportunity to participate in the government and public affairs of his or
her country, without any discrimination prohibited by international human rights principles and
without any unreasonable restrictions. This right can be exercised directly, by participating in
referenda, standing for elected office and by other means, or can be exercised through freely
chosen representatives.
Editing polls is an "unreasonable restriction" against the true result and manipulates it and locking threads disables voting.7 International election observation missions are expected to issue timely, accurate and
impartial statements to the public (including providing copies to electoral authorities and
other appropriate national entities), presenting their findings, conclusions and any appropriate
recommendations they determine could help improve election related processes.
Moderators observe polls that are answered all over thr world, and they need to be made impartial or they are not allowed to be shown and must be deleted.Guarantees unimpeded access of the international election observer mission to all stages
of the election process and all election technologies, including electronic technologies
and the certification processes for electronic voting and other technologies, without
requiring election observation missions to enter into confidentiality or other nondisclosure
agreements concerning technologies or election processes, and recognizes that
international election observation missions may not certify technologies as acceptable;
The polls have their certification altered by changing options.h Guarantees that no governmental, security or electoral authority will interfere in the
activities of the international election observation mission; and
Moderators are security authorities and monitor electoral polls in the system servers administration, so you cannot edit them or a lock a thread with one without Max Barry, ECHR and UN secretary general direct permission.
This is the DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES
FOR INTERNATIONAL
ELECTION OBSERVATION
and
CODE OF CONDUCT
FOR INTERNATIONAL
ELECTION OBSERVERS officially
