If I am correct, the website mentioned in the post below me is not supposed to be mentioned, right?
viewtopic.php?p=27268858#p27268858
by Frenline Delpha » Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:51 pm
by Kryozerkia » Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:05 pm
Frenline Delpha wrote:If I am correct, the website mentioned in the post below me is not supposed to be mentioned, right?
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic ... #p27268858
by Frenline Delpha » Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:07 pm
Kryozerkia wrote:Frenline Delpha wrote:If I am correct, the website mentioned in the post below me is not supposed to be mentioned, right?
viewtopic.php?p=27268858#p27268858
It's forbidden to link to it. There was no link posted. Without a link, it isn't actionable.
by Ethel mermania » Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:12 pm
by Canton Empire » Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:16 pm
by The Blaatschapen » Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:35 pm
Canton Empire wrote:Sorry if this is spam, but why is that site banned?
by Ethel mermania » Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:37 pm
by Katganistan » Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:05 pm
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jan 09, 2016 8:36 am
Katganistan wrote:I should think a mention in passing (literally, here just mentioning it) is something quite different than linking to or discussing it at length, or encouraging people to go to it. No?
by Gurori » Mon Jan 11, 2016 6:03 pm
by Euroslavia » Mon Jan 11, 2016 8:07 pm
Gurori wrote:ED is basically 4chan's Wikipedia and considering the fact that it is 4chan's Wikipedia, of course there'll be inappropriate content on it. Surprisingly, the website wasn't founded with malicious intentions.
Discussing the website itself is fine but linking to it is an absolute no-no.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bhadeshistan, The Overmind, United Calanworie
Advertisement