NATION

PASSWORD

[r] troll General/Russian airstrikes in Syria

Who needs it, who got it, who hands it out and why.
User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55270
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

[r] troll General/Russian airstrikes in Syria

Postby Risottia » Thu Oct 08, 2015 12:01 am

American Imperial Union wrote:Let's support Russia and bomb all the rebels. Let's support Bashar Al assad. It is better to have an authoritarian dictatorship than an ISIS caliphate or a Libya style fragmentation that allows Islam to gain power and control.

We need to outlaw this religion in the west, we need to forbid immigration fron Mexico, south and central America, Africa and the middle east to European or us and Canadian countries. We must do this to preserve our people, our culture, our religion and our civilization. These savages(referring to the people that constitute such groups as isis, and are generally inferior) are not compatible with our intelligence, culture, civilization and people.


I would say that the feeble attempt at restricting the "savages" thingy at ISIS-like groups alone isn't enough to cancel the "outlaw Islam" and the slurs against anything that is outside the "European, us, or Canadian countries". (Really. Canadian COUNTRIES?)
.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30594
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Oct 08, 2015 1:34 am

I don't think that one's actionable - though I concede that, at times, it tapdances close to the line (and seems to know where the line lies).

My reasoning:

1) Calling for the outlawing of [a] religion isn't inherently actionable in NationStates.

2) Calling for the banning of immigration isn't inherently actionable in NationStates.

3) The 'savages' is very specifically limited to ISIS 'and similar groups' rather than all Muslims and/or immigrants.

4) Inelegant grammar isn't actionable in NationStates.
Last edited by The Archregimancy on Thu Oct 08, 2015 1:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55270
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:49 am

The Archregimancy wrote:I don't think that one's actionable - though I concede that, at times, it tapdances close to the line (and seems to know where the line lies).

My reasoning:

1) Calling for the outlawing of [a] religion isn't inherently actionable in NationStates.

2) Calling for the banning of immigration isn't inherently actionable in NationStates.

3) The 'savages' is very specifically limited to ISIS 'and similar groups' rather than all Muslims and/or immigrants.

4) Inelegant grammar isn't actionable in NationStates.


I must concede to the Modly wisdom on the first three points, but I shall continue to bear resentment and frustration about the fourth one. :D

*leaves an offering of knife-sliced Parma ham*
.


Return to Moderation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Drop Your Pants, The Merry-Men

Advertisement

Remove ads