NATION

PASSWORD

[R] Trolling in Swedish Democrat thread

Who needs it, who got it, who hands it out and why.
User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

[R] Trolling in Swedish Democrat thread

Postby Gauthier » Sat Jul 25, 2015 4:13 pm

Using the racist term "chimp," something that's frequently used to imply animalistic behavior in dark-skinned individuals (i.e. "chimp out"), to describe Muslims possibly behaving uncivilized towards an LGBT pride parade set to be held in their neighborhood smacks of trolling.

Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:
Liriena wrote:I do agree that acceptance of LGBT people should be encouraged even in Sweden's muslim community (although I'm not particularly fond of comments along the line of "living in the stone age", since they make my inner anthropologist cringe).

My issue is that I doubt the sincerity of the Swedish Democrats' support for the LGBT community in this respect. To me, it seems like they are cynically using Swedish LGBT people in a ploy to further their anti-immigration rhetoric.

if the Muslims show civility in the face of ideological difference, they gain respect and be taken seriously.
It's up to them if they act like chimps.
Last edited by Gauthier on Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:39 am, edited 3 times in total.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jul 25, 2015 5:20 pm

Instances of possible baiting:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:This thread has really exposed the hypocrites and those with real principles.


You, for one. You are normally heavily biased against homophobia, but the minute that it comes from a community you view as "oppressed", you justify their positions, even if their positions against homosexuals borderline on genocidal. No. Fucking. Joke.


Cannabis Islands wrote: SJWs view Muslims as being more oppressed than us queers, so it's okay for them to hold those views.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sat Jul 25, 2015 5:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:33 am

Using the racist phrase "Chimping Out" referring to possible violent backlash from Muslim refugees:

Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:This is done with the sole intent of antagonizing Muslims, and with the suggestion that LGBT rights and Muslims cannot go together.

It's also done hoping that this will cause greater rifts between the LGBT and Muslim communities of Europe.

As a second-gen immigrant, I can't really say that I'm fond of this at all.

it will depend on the Muslims chimping out as to wether or not this will create divides between the communities.


Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:
Knask wrote:Wait, aren't you asking the natives to change their culture to suit your feelings? The culture of the swedish LGBTQ-movement is anti-racist and intersectional, but you'd like that to change.Such a desire might get you deported...

So the Muslims HAVE to let their radicals chimp out at them?
If anything, this is a chance to let the Muslim community show itself.
Are you afraid because you think the Muslims HAVE no choice but to act like animals?
Last edited by Gauthier on Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:44 am

Now referring to the refugees as animals.

Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:
You are aware that this is not the first time right wingers have used this form of provocation ? And each time that indeed was exactly the response they got.
People owning property in the neighbourhoods were not amused by the damage. Nor were people living in neighbourhoods where "solidarity protests" were held - especially since most of the "protesting" seemed to boil down to "smash things" and "rob stores".

then the problem is these animals rioting, not gays existing near them.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:50 am

Went to Page 2 with no response.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Jul 27, 2015 10:25 am

Essentially advocating the death of refugees by sending them back to the country they fled from, with racist innuendoes thrown in for good measure ("sand dunes" implying the refugees are Arabic when in fact they're Somali).

Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
They can go back where they came from obviously. *nod nod*

quite literally yes.
They are refugees, which means they owe everything to their host nation. Sweden owes them nothing, the refugees and their families owe them everything.
If they can't help themselves but attack a peaceful parade that offends them, they can bug off back to their sand dunes and civil wars.
Last edited by Gauthier on Mon Jul 27, 2015 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27796
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:34 am

Gauthier wrote:("sand dunes" implying the refugees are Arabic when in fact they're Somali).

I'm just going to address this single point. Somalia has plenty of sand, and much of it is in dunes. Just because the Saharan states are primarily Arab doesn't mean they're the only ones with sand.

Gauthier wrote:Went to Page 2 with no response.

That usually means that none of the mods who viewed the report thought it was particularly actionable, or particularly non-actionable. They just left it for other mods.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:03 pm

Flaming/baiting:
Anglo-Saxon North America wrote:screw that noise. The hellmakes you believe this has to do with race? It's their default to violence, outrageous beliefs, and inability to assimilate.
It's culture you illiterate, race has nothing to do with this. Do you actually mean to say all Muslims must be Turks or Arabs?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Moderation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Glorious Freedonia

Advertisement

Remove ads