MASSIVE "All Southerners are Inbred" Trolling on Gay Thread

[TURTLESHROOM II]

Whoop, there it is.

Yes.

There it is.

Now, I assume a bible-holding gun-toting God-fearing Republican tea party Right would allow both incest and polygamy, considering that basically the Bible Belt for incest and your God given right for polygamy

Given that you are evil enough to support incest

Evil always finds a way.

-post censored for liberty-

Polygamy... You know that means that you can use the bible in favour of that? What's the problem?

Incest?
See: United States Bible Belt

Not pedophilia and beastiality, moron.

-but incest and polygamy are not legal, so marriage is not "equal". Fight the incest-ophobe bigotry! Marriage for all consenting adults over eighteen without exception!

Agreed. We should.
And yes, I am serious.

[Frisbeeteria]

Yeah, not seeing it ... at all.

[The High Lords]

Yeah, not seeing it ... at all.

Allow me to clarify. They're referring to incest and polygamy, right? And they're also referencing the United States Bible Belt, a general region not quite North, not quite South (think W. Va, Tennessee, those places, especially those in the Appalachians). By placing the two items in conjunction, the poster is delivering the message that those who live in that area are incestuous, and also alluding to the derogatory stereotype that there is "inbreeding" in those regions.

Hopefully that cleared it up.

[Frisbeeteria]

Hopefully that cleared it up.

Yeah, this poor Southern boy born and bred in the Appalachians couldn't figure that out, thanks. I am, in fact, the supposed target audience.

What I'm not seeing is any trolling.

[May Mays]

Sorry, I realize that we're not supposed to post opinions in moderation threads, but:

-post censored for liberty-

Polygamy... You know that means that you can use the bible in favour of that? What's the problem?

Incest?
See: United States Bible Belt

emphasis mine

How is alleging that incest is something most of the Bible Belt is in favor of not trolling or flamebaiting?

[Risottia]

Not pedophilia and beastiality, moron.

(red mine) That could be kind of flaming, coudln't it?

[Mefpan]

Stumbled upon this.

Wondering how my comment basically embracing me being declared evil is supposed to mean that I consider all Southerners inbred.

[Farnhamia]

Not pedophilia and beastiality, moron.

(red mine) That could be kind of flaming, coudln't it?

Yeah, kind of.

[Farnhamia]

Sorry, I realize that we're not supposed to post opinions in moderation threads, but:

Polygamy... You know that means that you can use the bible in favour of that? What's the problem?

Incest?
See: United States Bible Belt

emphasis mine

How is alleging that incest is something most of the Bible Belt is in favor of not trolling or flamebaiting?

Addressed

[Farnhamia]

Hopefully that cleared it up.

Yeah, this poor Southern boy born and bred in the Appalachians couldn't figure that out, thanks. I am, in fact, the supposed target audience.

What I'm not seeing is any trolling.

And I read it as All X Are Y trolling. Had he said, "Which some/many/a whole lot of the people in the US Bible Belt approve," I might agree, but he didn't.

[Panchia]

Yeah, this poor Southern boy born and bred in the Appalachians couldn't figure that out, thanks. I am, in fact, the supposed target audience.

What I'm not seeing is any trolling.

And I read it as All X Are Y trolling. Had he said, "Which some/many/a whole lot of the people in the US Bible Belt approve," I might agree, but he didn't.

I fail to see how that means all people in the bible belt can be seen as the target, more than that the said things were present in those states.

[TURTLESHROOM II]

So calling someone who thinks pedophilia will become legal in the aftermath of the SSM ruling a moron constitutes as trolling?! Are you kidding me? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

[Furry Alairia and Algeria]

I'll also throw this in for flaming.

http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=12493272

[The High Lords]

I'll also throw this in for flaming.

http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=12493272

That's a GHR thing.

[Indhir]

So calling someone who thinks pedophilia will become legal in the aftermath of the SSM ruling a moron constitutes as trolling?! Are you kidding me? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

Flaming is calling anyone a name. Saying that what they said was moronic would be fine however.

[The Archregimancy]

I'll also throw this in for flaming.

http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=12493272

That's a GHR thing.

So calling someone who thinks pedophilia will become legal in the aftermath of the SSM ruling a moron constitutes as trolling?! Are you kidding me? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

Flaming is calling anyone a name. Saying that what they said was moronic would be fine however.

I appreciate that you were both trying to be helpful - and you are indeed both correct - but please don't post in report threads unless:

A) You made the original report

B) You are the subject of the report

C) You are offering new evidence directly germane to the report

D) You are offering new evidence about related behaviour in the same thread

Pointing out that a TG should be reported via a GHR or offering an opinion on what constitutes trolling do not fit into these categories, and can bring about a warning for spamming moderation.

While you were trying to be helpful, all you've done is slow me down in clearing outstanding Moderation reports for the time it's taken me to type this up.

[TURTLESHROOM II]

Flaming is calling anyone a name. Saying that what they said was moronic would be fine however.

Okay, I understand the difference. Thank you for the resolution.

[Panchia]

And I read it as All X Are Y trolling. Had he said, "Which some/many/a whole lot of the people in the US Bible Belt approve," I might agree, but he didn't.

I fail to see how that means all people in the bible belt can be seen as the target, more than that the said things were present in those states.