British Home Counties wrote:Of course. They don't pay taxes here and will never benefit me, so why would I benefit them?
Because unless you're an absolute cunt you'd feel a moral obligation to?
Flaming.
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.
"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)
Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.
He's not calling you a name, he's calling people without morals the name. If you choose to affiliate yourself with the latter group and take umbrage, not our problem.
So as long as I precede an insult with "unless", it is completely fine?
"Unless you are pro-life, you're an absolute cunt" ? / "Unless you're an absolute cunt, you are pro-euthanasia"?
That's not directly calling anyone a name either, just people who choose to affiliate themselves with a moral-less group.
I would like a second opinion.
Last edited by British Home Counties on Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.
"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)
Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.
IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE ... I wouldn't say it's flaming. He's more or less stating an opinion on how he thinks rational people would react/be. Not actionable as it is stated. Don't read anything more into it, nothing more is implied by this ruling.